The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994) · Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '94 · doi:10.1145/259963.260288 · Cited by 579
Direct manipulation vs. interface agents
Shneiderman, B., & Maes, P. (1997) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/267505.267514 · Cited by 518 · cited 2×
“One argument capitalizes on the fact that humanization of the interface may induce false mental models of the system (Norman, 1994; Shneiderman & Maes, 1997; Wilson, 1997).”
BackgroundSproull, L., Subramani, M., Kiesler, S., Walker, J., & Waters, K. (1996) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1102_1 · Cited by 399
Communicative facial displays as a new conversational modality
Takeuchi, A., & Nagao, K. (1993) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '93 · doi:10.1145/169059.169156 · Cited by 140
Cited by
(2006) · Cited by 2,256
Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review
Kuhail, M. A., Alturki, N., Alramlawi, S., & Alhejori, K. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11177-3 · Cited by 841
Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222250405 · Cited by 737
Li, J. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001 · Cited by 652
Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning
Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D., & Um, E. (2014) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.02.006 · Cited by 550
A Survey on Conversational Recommender Systems
Jannach, D., Manzoor, A., Cai, W., & Chen, L. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3453154 · Cited by 521
Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/365024.365304 · Cited by 479
'It's just like you talk to a friend': relational agents for older adults
Bickmore, T. W., Caruso, L., Clough-Gorr, K., & Heeren, T. (2005) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2005.09.002 · Cited by 341
Emotional Design in Digital Media for Learning
Plass, J. L., & Kaplan, U. (2016) · Emotions, Technology, Design, and Learning · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801856-9.00007-4 · Cited by 377
Gong, L. (2008) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.05.007 · Cited by 338
Social Dialongue with Embodied Conversational Agents
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2005) · Text, Speech and Language Technology · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3933-6_2 · Cited by 324
Negotiated Collusion: Modeling Social Language and its Relationship Effects in Intelligent Agents
Cassell, J., & Bickmore, T. (2003) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1023/a:1024026532471 · Cited by 253
Song, S. W., & Shin, M. (2024) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2121038 · Cited by 244
How to Optimize Learning From Animated Models: A Review of Guidelines Based on Cognitive Load
Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308320320 · Cited by 224
Kim, K., Boelling, L., Haesler, S., Bailenson, J., Bruder, G., & Welch, G. F. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR) · doi:10.1109/ismar.2018.00039 · Cited by 206
Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of User Experience of Computerised Therapy for Depression and Anxiety
Knowles, S. E., Toms, G., Sanders, C., Bee, P., Lovell, K., Rennick-Egglestone, S., Coyle, D., Kennedy, C. M., Littlewood, E., Kessler, D., et al. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084323 · Cited by 177
The Effects of Image and Animation in Enhancing Pedagogical Agent Persona
Baylor, A. L., & Ryu, J. (2003) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/v0wq-nwgn-jb54-fat4 · Cited by 188
Fostering multimedia learning of science: Exploring the role of an animated agent’s image
Dunsworth, Q., & Atkinson, R. K. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.010 · Cited by 178
Towards a model of technology and literacy development: Story listening systems
Cassell, J. (2004) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2003.11.003 · Cited by 151
Case study—Embodied virtual agents: An analysis on reasons for failure
Ben Mimoun, M. S., Poncin, I., & Garnier, M. (2012) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.07.006 · Cited by 136
Liao, Q. V., Mas-ud Hussain, M., Chandar, P., Davis, M., Khazaeni, Y., Crasso, M. P., Wang, D., Muller, M., Shami, N. S., & Geyer, W. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173577 · Cited by 116
Scholten, M. R., Kelders, S. M., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. (2017) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.7351 · Cited by 97
“Autonomous delivery of warmth and empathy by ECAs toward users has shown positive effects, and studies show that this effect may be larger at the time the user experiences frustration [74,86,88].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA model of user adoption of interface agents for email notification
Serenko, A. (2008) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2008.04.004 · Cited by 92
Martínez-Miranda, J., Martínez, A., Ramos, R., Aguilar, H., Jiménez, L., Arias, H., Rosales, G., & Valencia, E. (2019) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-019-1387-1 · Cited by 79
Enali: A Research and Design Framework for Virtual Characters and Pedagogical Agents
Veletsianos, G., Miller, C., & Doering, A. (2009) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.41.2.c · Cited by 52
Kuttal, S. K., Ong, B., Kwasny, K., & Robe, P. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445659 · Cited by 44
Generating Robot/Agent backchannels during a storytelling experiment
Al Moubayed, S., Baklouti, M., Chetouani, M., Dutoit, T., Mahdhaoui, A., Martin, J.-C., Ondas, S., Pelachaud, C., Urbain, J., & Yilmaz, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.2009.5152572 · Cited by 33
Kuttal, S. K., Myers, J., Gurka, S., Magar, D., Piorkowski, D., & Bellamy, R. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) · doi:10.1109/vl/hcc50065.2020.9127276 · Cited by 27
Shin, J. Y., & Huh-Yoo, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the 14th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3421937.3422024 · Cited by 18
Supporting presentation techniques based on virtual humans in educational virtual worlds
Chittaro, L., Ieronutti, L., & Rigutti, S. (2005) · 2005 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW'05) · doi:10.1109/cw.2005.86 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- DEHN, D. M., & VAN MULKEN, S.
- Venue
- International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-22
- ISSN
- 1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032099985
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 31.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.