The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Many Subjects Constitute a Study?
Abstract
In fMRI there are two classes of inference: one aims to make a comment about the "typical" characteristics of a population, and the other about "average" characteristics. The first pertains to studies of normal subjects that try to identify some qualitative aspect of normal functional anatomy. The second class necessarily applies to clinical neuroscience studies that want to make an inference about quantitative differences of a regionally specific nature. The first class of inferences is adequately serviced by conjunction analyses and fixed-effects models with relatively small numbers of subjects. The second requires random-effect analyses and larger cohorts.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, small sample sizes can be informative about typicality of a feature in a population, when features are identified in the majority of cases sampled[18].”
From In vivo PET imaging of neuroinflammation in familial frontotemporal dementia (2021) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 817
Mental Rotation Meets the Motion Aftereffect: The Role of hV5/MT+ in Visual Mental Imagery
Seurinck, R., de Lange, F. P., Achten, E., & Vingerhoets, G. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21525 · Cited by 36
Functional magnetic resonance imaging-mediated learning of increased activity in auditory areas
Yoo, S., Lee, J., O’Leary, H. M., Lee, V., Choo, S.-E., & Jolesz, F. A. (2007) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e3282f202ac · Cited by 36
“Condition and participant effects were estimated [12], and a second-level group analysis was performed using a random-effects model [13].”
MethodUnderstanding the internal states of others by listening to action verbs
Cesare, G. D., Fasano, F., Errante, A., et al. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.06.017 · Cited by 36
Nakata, H., Sakamoto, K., Ferretti, A., Perrucci, M. G., Gratta, C. D., Kakigi, R., & Romani, G. L. (2008) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.07.008 · Cited by 39
Hoenig, K., Kuhl, C. K., & Scheef, L. (2005) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2343031565 · Cited by 36
Sabbah, N., Sanda, N., Authié, C., Mohand‐Saïd, S., Sahel, J., Habas, C., Amedi, A., & Safran, A. B. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep43223 · Cited by 38
“Each of these localizers was extracted from a group of normally sighted controls and analyzed in normalized Talairach space using a random effect GLM which enabled generalization of the findings to the population (see below; Friston et al. 1999).”
MethodFunctional MRI in the Investigation of Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury
Graner, J. L., Oakes, T. R., French, L. M., & Riedy, G. P. (2013) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2013.00016 · Cited by 41
Zimmerman, B. J., Abraham, I., Schmidt, S. A., Baryshnikov, Y., & Husain, F. T. (2019) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00053 · Cited by 35
Spoken language processing activates the primary visual cortex
Seydell‐Greenwald, A., Wang, X., Newport, E. L., Bi, Y., & Striem-Amit, E. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289671 · Cited by 37
“Error bars denote standard error of the mean, *p< 0.05, **p < 0.005 FDR-corrected. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289671.g002 PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289671 August 11, 2023 6 / 22 random effects analysis (RFX GLM; [59]).”
InfluentialAzulay, H., Striem-Amit, E., & Amedi, A. (2009) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0089-2 · Cited by 38
“Across-subject statistical parametric maps were calculated by using hierarchical random-effects model analysis (Friston et al. 1999) after transformation into Talairach space (Talairach and Tournoux 1988).”
MethodNeugroschl, C., Denolin, V., Schuind, F. A., et al. (2005) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-005-2763-4 · Cited by 35
“A random-effects analysis was also performed to assess significant sensory activations among the control population, using the previously obtained contrast images as input for a one-sample t test [ 27 ].”
MethodAssessing the sensitivity of fMRI group maps
McNamee, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.02.016 · Cited by 35
“Combined maps are useful for examining activation regions that are ''typical'' of a certain subject population or for comparing average effects of one group of subjects to another (Friston et al., 1999a).”
InfluentialNeural Correlates of Direct Access Trading in a Real Stock Market: An fMRI Investigation
Raggetti, G., Ceravolo, M. G., Fattobene, L., & Dio, C. D. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00536 · Cited by 36
Joyce, K. E., & Hayasaka, S. (2012) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-012-9152-3 · Cited by 34
“This was later used to discuss power (Friston et al. 1996) and sample sizes (Friston et al. 1999) in neuroimaging data analysis from a theoretical perspective.”
MethodRitter, A., Franz, M., Miltner, W. H. R., & Weiß, T. (2019) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1377 · Cited by 41
Shirao, N., Okamoto, Y., Okada, G., Ueda, K., & Yamawaki, S. (2005) · European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s00406-005-0566-x · Cited by 34
“Using group analysis according to a random effect model that allowed inference to the general population [ 8 ], we first identified brain regions that showed a significant response to word sets of unpleasant words concerning interpersonal relationships in comparison with the response to neutral word sets among the mal…”
MethodMobile Phone Emissions Modulate Brain Excitability in Patients with Focal Epilepsy
Tombini, M., Pellegrino, G., Pasqualetti, P., et al. (2012) · Brain stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2012.07.006 · Cited by 34
Measuring neuroplasticity associated with cerebral palsy rehabilitation: An MRI based power analysis
Reid, L. B., Pagnozzi, A. M., Fiori, S., Boyd, R. N., Dowson, N., & Rose, S. (2017) · International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2017.01.010 · Cited by 35
“Certainly, lternative forms of hypotheses are possible, such as calculating the roportion of the population whom can be expected to see a brain hange meeting certain criteria (observed brain change ‘typicality’) Friston et al., 1999a,b).”
BackgroundfMRI of peripheral visual field representation
Stenbacka, L., & Vanni, S. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.023 · Cited by 33
Shared and distinct neural correlates of vowel perception and production
Grabski, K., Schwartz, J., Lamalle, L., Vilain, C., Vallée, N., Baciu, M., Bas, J. L., & Sato, M. (2013) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.11.003 · Cited by 39
Robineau, F., Saj̈, A., Neveu, R., Ville, D. V. D., Scharnowski, F., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2017) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2017.1301262 · Cited by 32
Fleck, D. E., Kotwal, R., Eliassen, J. C., Lamy, M., DelBello, M. P., Adler, C. M., Durling, M., Cerullo, M. A., & Strakowski, S. M. (2011) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.053 · Cited by 35
“It is generally accepted that group sizes b10 are suboptimal in fMRI studies (Friston et al., 1999).”
Brain activations associated with shifts in response criterion on a recognition test.
Miller, M. B., Handy, T. C., Cutler, J., Inati, S., & Wolford, G. (2001) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/h0087363 · Cited by 32
“A random-effects model was used to make statistical inferences (Friston et al., 1999).”
MethodThe Sightless View: Neural Correlates of Occluded Objects
Hulme, O. J., & Zeki, S. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl031 · Cited by 33
Marques, J. F., Canessa, N., & Cappa, S. F. (2008) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.07.004 · Cited by 31
Body Posture Modulates Action Perception
Zimmermann, M., Toni, I., & de Lange, F. P. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5570-12.2013 · Cited by 34
“Contrasts of the parameter estimates for these comparisons constituted the data for the second-stage analyses, which treated participants as a random effect (Friston et al., 1999).”
ResultCerebral activation related to implicit sequence learning in a Double Serial Reaction Time task
van der Graaf, F. H. C. E., Maguire, R. P., Leenders, K. L., & de Jong, B. M. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.103 · Cited by 32
Ehrsson, H. H., Fagergren, A., Ehrsson, G. O., & Forssberg, H. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01253.2005 · Cited by 33
“…design, with a sparse presentation of events, was optimized to detect neuronal responses evoked by the loading and unloading events relative to the baseline (Friston et al. 1999b), although this design is inefficient when it comes to making a direct contrast between the perturbations events.”
BackgroundResultSparse imaging of the auditory oddball task with functional MRI
Müller, B. W., Stude, P., Nebel, K., Wiese, H., Ladd, M. E., Forsting, M., & Jueptner, M. (2003) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200308260-00011 · Cited by 31
Model assessment and model building in fMRI
Razavi, M., Grabowski, T. J., Vispoel, W. P., et al. (2003) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10141 · Cited by 32
“…[Goodwin, 1998; Leary, 2001], resting condition [Raichle et al., 2001], baseline tasks [Newman et al., 2001; Stark and Squire, 2001], sample size [Friston et al., 1999], efficiency [Dale, 1999]; and subject factors, e.g., blood pressure, hematocrit [Levin et al., 2001], anxiety, and intake of…”
BackgroundSleep apnea: Altered brain connectivity underlying a working-memory challenge
Canessa, N., Castronovo, V., Cappa, S. F., Marelli, S., Iadanza, A., Falini, A., & Ferini‐Strambi, L. (2018) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.036 · Cited by 30
“We performed two statistical analyses of fMRI data, via randomeffect models implemented in a 2-level procedure (Friston et al., 1999).”
MethodDevelopment of effective connectivity for narrative comprehension in children
Schmithorst, V. J., Holland, S. K., & Plante, E. (2007) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e3282e9a4ef · Cited by 32
A Reference Effect Approach for Power Analysis in fMRI
Zarahn, E., & Slifstein, M. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0852 · Cited by 31
“Design As an example, univariate power was computed for the comparison of a single event type (probability of occurrence 5 0.5) vs “baseline” for a type of eventelated design that Friston and colleagues referred to s stationary stochastic (Friston et al., 1999b).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFunctional and diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the sheep brain
Lee, W., Lee, S. D., Park, M. Y., Foley, L., Purcell-Estabrook, E., Kim, H., & Yoo, S. (2015) · BMC Veterinary Research · doi:10.1186/s12917-015-0581-8 · Cited by 30
“group-averaged trend, random effect analysis (RFX) [52] was used to perform a statistical test at the group level.”
MethodVividness and accuracy: Two independent aspects of motor imagery
Mizuguchi, N., Suezawa, M., & Kanosue, K. (2018) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2018.12.005 · Cited by 28
Less efficient and costly processes of frontal cortex in childhood chronic fatigue syndrome
Mizuno, K., Tanaka, M., Tanabe, H. C., Joudoi, T., Kawatani, J., Shigihara, Y., Tomoda, A., Miike, T., Imai-Matsumura, K., Sadato, N., et al. (2015) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.09.001 · Cited by 30
“Second, the contrast images corresponding to each condition in each participant were used for group analyses with a random-effects model to obtain population inferences (Friston et al., 1999).”
MethodMizuno, K., Yoneda, T., Komi, M., Hirai, T., Watanabe, Y., & Tomoda, A. (2013) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.004 · Cited by 30
“Second, the contrast images corresponding to each condition for each participant were used for group analyses with a random-effects model to obtain population inferences (Friston et al., 1999).”
MethodResource-demanding versus cost-effective bimanual interaction in the brain
Aramaki, Y., Osu, R., & Sadato, N. (2010) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2244-0 · Cited by 31
“Second, to make inferences at the population level, individual data were summarized and incorporated into a random-eVects model (Friston et al. 1999).”
MethodTemporal Profile of Amygdala Gamma Oscillations in Response to Faces
Sato, W., Kochiyama, T., Uono, S., Matsuda, K., Usui, K., Inoue, Y., & Toichi, M. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00142 · Cited by 30
Conceptual knowledge in the brain: fMRI evidence for a featural organization
Marques, J. F., Canessa, N., Siri, S., Catricalà, E., & Cappa, S. F. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.070 · Cited by 29
“Statistical maps were generated using a random-effect model (Friston et al., 1999), implemented in a two-level procedure.”
MethodKalpakidou, A. K., Allin, M. P. G., Walshe, M., Giampietro, V., Nam, K.-W., McGuire, P. K., Rifkin, L., Murray, R. M., & Nosarti, C. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034858 · Cited by 29
“In addition, it is possible that fMRI techniques are particularly sensitive in detecting differences at the neuronal activation level between small groups of participants, like those included in the current study, whereas behavioural analyses require larger groups to provide reliable results [69,70].”
BackgroundEvidence for an effector-independent action system from people born without hands
Liu, Y., Vannuscorps, G., Caramazza, A., & Striem-Amit, E. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2017789117 · Cited by 28
Effects of melodic intonation therapy in patients with chronic nonfluent aphasia
Marchina, S., Norton, A. C., & Gottfried Schlaug, A. (2022) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14927 · Cited by 29
Effector-independent brain activity during motor imagery of the upper and lower limbs: An fMRI study
Mizuguchi, N., Nakata, H., & Kanosue, K. (2014) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.08.025 · Cited by 31
Phonemic manipulation in Japanese: an fMRI study
Seki, A., Okada, T., Koeda, T., & Sadato, N. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.012 · Cited by 29
The supraspinal neural correlate of bladder cold sensation—An fMRI study
Mehnert, U., Michels, L., Zempleni, M., Schurch, B., & Kollias, S. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21070 · Cited by 29
Improving the reliability of functional localizers
Duncan, K. J. K., & Devlin, J. T. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.009 · Cited by 28
“Because the fixed-effects analyses typically usedwith functional localizers do not take inter-run variance into account, they can easily find a local, rather than global maximum (Friston et al., 1999), resulting in a suboptimal localization.”
Uchiyama, Y., Toyoda, H., Honda, M., Yoshida, H., Kochiyama, T., Ebe, K., & Sadato, N. (2008) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2008.03.013 · Cited by 34
“Group analysis with a random-effect model The weighted sum of the parameter estimates in the individual analysis constituted ''contrast'' images, which were used for the group analysis (Friston et al., 1999 ).”
InfluentialVisual Cortex Activation in Bilingual Blind Individuals during Use of Native and Second Language
Ofan, R. H., & Zohary, E. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl039 · Cited by 29
Hanakawa, T., Honda, M., Zito, G., Dimyan, M. A., & Hallett, M. (2006) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-0336-z · Cited by 29
“An acrosssubject conjunction analysis was used to examine the consistency of the activity among the subjects and then to address a semi-population level statistical inference from a relatively small number of subjects (Friston et al. 1999).”
MethodFries, P., & Maris, E. (2022) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01857 · Cited by 28
“Therefore, we need to make the conservative assumption that sensitivity is one, as has been argued before (Friston et al., 1999).”
BackgroundMensebach, C., Beblo, T., Drießen, M., Wingenfeld, K., Mertens, M., Rullkoetter, N., Lange, W., Markowitsch, H. J., Ollech, I., Saveedra, A. S., et al. (2009) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.02.006 · Cited by 28
“Effects were computed at the random effects (RFX) level (Friston et al., 1999) to take into account within- and between-individual variability of changes of the Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent contrast (BOLD).”
Raz, A., Lamar, M., Buhle, J. T., Kane, M. J., & Peterson, B. S. (2007) · American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis · doi:10.1080/00029157.2007.10401611 · Cited by 28
Neural activities in human somatosensory cortical areas evoked by acupuncture stimulation
Yoo, S., Kerr, C. E., Park, M., et al. (2007) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2007.01.010 · Cited by 28
Leube, D., Erb, M., Grodd, W., et al. (2001) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00068-4 · Cited by 28
Neural Signatures of Gender Differences in Interpersonal Trust
Wu, Y. H., Hall, A. S. M., Siehl, S., Grafman, J. H., & Krüeger, F. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00225 · Cited by 27
Elsabagh, S., Premkumar, P., Anilkumar, A. P., & Kumari, V. (2009) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.01.026 · Cited by 27
Monitoring eye movements during fMRI tasks with echo planar images
Tregellas, J. R., Tanabe, J., Miller, D. E., & Freedman, R. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10070 · Cited by 27
“13), even such a small gain in apparent sensitivity can be valuable in neuroimaging study designs that sacrifice the sensitivity of fixed effects analyses for inferential power of mixed models [Friston et al., 1999].”
BackgroundInfluentialHow attitudes generated by humanoid robots shape human brain activity
Cesare, G. D., Vannucci, F., Rea, F., Sciutti, A., & Sandini, G. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-73728-3 · Cited by 28
Kim, H., Yoo, S., & Lee, J. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.09.049 · Cited by 26
“, fixed-effects, or FFX within a subject (Friston et al., 1999)).”
Kumari, V. (2010) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.08.004.2010 · Cited by 25
“Data were analysed using a random effect procedure (Friston et al., 1999).”
Volk, S., & Köhler, T. (2012) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112449656 · Cited by 26
Observing social gestures: an fMRI study
Knutson, K. M., McClellan, E. M., & Grafman, J. H. (2008) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1352-6 · Cited by 26
Sinke, C., Forkmann, K., Schmidt, K., Wiech, K., & Bingel, U. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.02.008 · Cited by 26
Optimizing Stimulation and Analysis Protocols for Neonatal fMRI
Cusack, R., Wild, C. J., Linke, A. C., Arichi, T., Lee, D. S. C., & Han, V. K. M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120202 · Cited by 24
Mizuno, K., Tanaka, M., Tanabe, H. C., Sadato, N., & Watanabe, Y. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.025 · Cited by 25
Marquardt, K., Ramezanpour, H., Dicke, P. W., & Thier, P. (2017) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0317-16.2017 · Cited by 24
“…whether results obtained for individual subjects are valid at the population level, we conducted a second-level analysis, deploying a randomeffects model, comparing the average activation for a given voxel with the variability of that activation over the examined population (Friston et al., 1999).”
MethodThree studies on the neuroeconomics of decision-making when payoffs are real and negative
Berns, G. S., Capra, C. M., Moore, S. E., & NOUSSAIR, C. N. (2008) · Advances in health economics and health services research · doi:10.1016/s0731-2199(08)20001-4 · Cited by 25
Finger movements lighten neural loads in the recognition of ideographic characters
Matsuo, K., Kato, C., Okada, T., et al. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00114-9 · Cited by 25
WILKE, M., Lidzba, K., & Krägeloh‐Mann, I. (2008) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.09.007 · Cited by 25
Landgraf, S., Meer, E., & Krüeger, F. (2010) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0264-7 · Cited by 25
“A General Linear Model (GLM) corrected for first-order serial correlation with random-effect analyses on the multisubject level ( Friston, Holmes, & Worsley, 1999 )t o explore brain regions associated with multiplication difficulty level.”
MethodApproaching an ecologically valid functional anatomy of spontaneous “willed” action
Hunter, M. D., Farrow, T. F. D., Papadakis, N. G., Wilkinson, I. D., Woodruff, P. W. R., & Spence, S. A. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00374-4 · Cited by 25
“Such a model is appropriately used in this case to make inferences regarding normal functional anatomy, typical of the group being studied (Friston et al., 1999).”
MethodRapid Amygdala Gamma Oscillations in Response to Eye Gaze
Sato, W., Kochiyama, T., Uono, S., Matsuda, K., Usui, K., Inoue, Y., & Toichi, M. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028188 · Cited by 24
“To confirm the consistency of the effects across subjects, we conducted conjunction analyses based on a global null hypothesis [26] with the height threshold of p ,0.”
Mapping Depression in Schizophrenia: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Kumari, V., PETERS, E. R., Guinn, A., Fannon, D. G., Russell, T. A., Sumich, A. L., Kuipers, E., Williams, S., & Ffytche, D. H. (2015) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbv186 · Cited by 24
EEG-correlated fMRI of human alpha (de-)synchronization
Knaut, P., von Wegner, F., Morzelewski, A., & Laufs, H. (2019) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.04.715 · Cited by 25
On the synchrony of steady state visual evoked potentials and oscillatory burst events
Vialatte, F., Dauwels, J., Maurice, M., Yamaguchi, Y., & Cichocki, A. S. (2009) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-009-9082-4 · Cited by 23
“Because we checked using surrogate data that our results are not spurious, and because we constrained the number of bump as compared to what we reported in (Vialatte et al. 2008b), this is a sufficient (as we investigate here a typical, and not a quantitative aspect of EEG, see e.g., Friston et al. 1999 ) proof that E…”
MethodResultTanabe, H. C., Katô, M., Miyauchi, S., Hayashi, S., & Yanagida, T. (2004) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.09.010 · Cited by 24
Yoshimura, Y., Okamoto, Y., Onoda, K., Okada, G., Toki, S., Yoshino, A., Yamashita, H., & Yamawaki, S. (2013) · Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1111/pcn.12115 · Cited by 23
Revisiting multi-subject random effects in fMRI: Advocating prevalence estimation
Rosenblatt, J. D., Vink, M., & Benjamini, Y. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.025 · Cited by 23
“[9] the authors discuss how the use of conjunction hypotheses could allow to infer on the population without the explicit distributional assumptions in the random effect approach.”
BackgroundNegative BOLD responses during hand and foot movements: An fMRI study
Nakata, H., Domoto, R., Mizuguchi, N., Sakamoto, K., & Kanosue, K. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215736 · Cited by 26
Neuroimaging Reveals Automatic Speech Coding during Perception of Written Word Meaning
Xu, B., Grafman, J. H., Gaillard, W. D., Spanaki, M. V., Ishii, K., Balsamo, L. M., Makale, M., & Theodore, W. H. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1215 · Cited by 23
Davison, S. L., Bell, R. J., Robinson, P. J., Jane, F., Leech, J., Maruff, P. T., Egan, G. F., & Davis, S. R. (2013) · Menopause The Journal of The North American Menopause Society · doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e318287474f · Cited by 23
“004] CogState continuous paired associate learning, number of errors 15 (5-47) 21 (4-56) 10 (2-46) 15 (2-49) 0.”
Reliability of individual functional MRI brain mapping of language.
Otzenberger, H., Gounot, D., Marrer, C., Namer, I. J., & Metz‐Lutz, M. (2005) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.4.484 · Cited by 22
Temporomesial Activation in Young Females Associated with Unpleasant Words concerning Body Image
Shirao, N., Okamoto, Y., Okada, G., Okamoto, Y., & Yamawaki, S. (2003) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000073630 · Cited by 23
Morita, M., Nakahara, K., & Hayashi, T. (2004) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2003.11.066 · Cited by 22
Kibleur, A., Polosan, M., Favre, P., Rudrauf, D., Bougerol, T., Chabardès, S., & Olivier David, A. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.10.018 · Cited by 23
“…the methodological solution of analyzing a cohort of rare cases, the approach limits the generalizability of the results reported here because the group variance was not explicitly modelled as can be done with random-effects analyses that are possible only on larger cohorts (Friston et al., 1999).”
BackgroundTaniwaki, T., Yoshiura, T., Ogata, K., Togao, O., Yamashita, K., Kida, H., Miura, S., Kira, J., & Tobimatsu, S. (2013) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.027 · Cited by 21
Geng, J. J., Ruff, C. C., & Driver, J. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21025 · Cited by 23
“Although we later turn to individual retinotopic analyses of visual areas V1–V3, we begin with a group-SPM random effects analysis in stereotactic space that allows for inference at the population level (Friston et al., 1999).”
MethodIntegration of identity and emotion information in faces: fMRI evidence
Yankouskaya, A., Stolte, M., Moradi, Z., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2017) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2017.05.004 · Cited by 23
Neural correlates of primary and reflective consciousness of spatial orienting
Bartolomeo, P., Zieren, N., Vohn, R., Dubois, B., & Sturm, W. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.005 · Cited by 22
An Iterative Jackknife Approach for Assessing Reliability and Power of fMRI Group Analyses
Wilke, M. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035578 · Cited by 21
“While certain differences must be expected to be present between those two analyses due to loss of power alone [12], the overall activation pattern (which, in both cases, is interpreted to be generalizable to be the average activation pattern of the general population [5]) should be similar.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFunctional MRI changes in the central motor system in myotonic dystrophy type 1
Caramia, F., Mainero, C., Gragnani, F., et al. (2009) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2009.07.006 · Cited by 22
“Functional MR images were analyzed using SPM99 Software (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, UK) [44,45] according to the following procedure.”
MethodMeasurements of brain activity complexity for varying mental loads
Dhamala, M., Pagnoni, G., Wiesenfeld, K. A., & Berns, G. S. (2002) · Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · doi:10.1103/physreve.65.041917 · Cited by 22
Sigalov, N., Maidenbaum, S., & Amedi, A. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.009 · Cited by 20
Mondt, K., Struys, E., van den Noort, M., Balériaux, D. F., Metens, T., Paquier, P. F., de Craen, P. V., Bosch, P., & Denolin, V. (2011) · Mind Brain and Education · doi:10.1111/j.1751-228x.2011.01113.x · Cited by 21
Ogura, E., Matsuyama, M., Goto, T. K., et al. (2011) · Dysphagia · doi:10.1007/s00455-011-9374-9 · Cited by 21
Nakagawa, K., Kawashima, S., Mizuguchi, N., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00499 · Cited by 21
Diwadkar, V. A., Re, M., Cecchetto, F., Garzitto, M., Piccin, S., Bonivento, C., Maieron, M., D’Agostini, S., Balestrieri, M., & Brambilla, P. (2017) · Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.05.010 · Cited by 21
Bartha, L., Mariën, P., Brenneis, C., et al. (2005) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.00292.x · Cited by 21
Atlas‐based multichannel monitoring of functional MRI signals in real‐time: Automated approach
Lee, J., O’Leary, H. M., Park, H., Jolesz, F. A., & Yoo, S. (2007) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20377 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Friston, K. J., Holmes, A. P., & Worsley, K. J.
- Affiliations
- National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
- ORCID
- Friston, Karl J.
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966363088
- Cited by
- 814
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- sample size, functional MRI, statistical inference, population inference, fixed effects model, random effects models, conjunction analysis, clinical neuroscience, functional anatomy, cohort size
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Research Design, Models, Statistical, Cohort Studies, Patient Selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review