Cited by 11Access Control and TrustAuction Theory and ApplicationsDigital Platforms and Economics

Bridging the Trust Gap in Electronic Markets: A Strategic Framework for Empirical Study

Bolton, Gary E., Katok, Elena, Ockenfels, Axel·2005·Applied Optimization

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/0-387-23392-x_7

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The growth of e-auctions and other forms of e-commerce is based, to a considerable degree, on reputation and trust.

    “The growth of e-auctions and other forms of e-commerce is based, to a considerable degree, on reputation and trust 5-10 .”

    From Evolution of indirect reciprocity (2005) · cites this paper as [8]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., & Ockenfels, A.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Venue
Applied Optimization
Published
2005-11-09
Pages
195-216
OpenAlex
W292350048
Cited by
11
References
36
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
10.55
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Auction Theory and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
Keywords
trust, electronic markets, online reputation systems, online trading, interpersonal relationships, digital platforms, strategic framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review