The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, procedural fairness perceptions are measured considering perceptions of procedural voice, outcome control, consistency of procedures across participants, suppression of bias, accuracy of factors, correctability of outcomes, and ethicality of the process [62,89].”
From Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability (2023) · cites this paper as [62]
In the citing paper
“This is somewhat unsurprising considering that correctability directly refers to the requirement of having an appeal process in place [62].”
From Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability (2023) · cites this paper as [62]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,004 of 1,004
Kerstetter, W. A., & Rasinski, K. A. (1994) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/bf02337294 · Cited by 20
Genovesi, S., Mönig, J. M., Schmitz, A., Poretschkin, M., Akila, M., Kahdan, M., Kleiner, R., Krieger, L., & Zimmermann, A. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-023-00291-8 · Cited by 19
Hubbard, K. E. (2024) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01216-y · Cited by 10
Schein (1996) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1379(199601)17:1
Metadata
- Authors
- Leventhal, G. S.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leventhal, Gerald S.
- ORCID
- Leventhal, Gerald S.
- Venue
- Social Exchange
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1980
- Pages
- 27-55
- OpenAlex
- W1526225581
- Cited by
- 3,010
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 130 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 153 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 129
- FWCI
- 16.34
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- equity theory, reward allocation, resource allocation, social systems, organizational justice, punishment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
