The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, procedural fairness perceptions are measured considering perceptions of procedural voice, outcome control, consistency of procedures across participants, suppression of bias, accuracy of factors, correctability of outcomes, and ethicality of the process [62,89].”
From Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability (2023) · cites this paper as [62]
In the citing paper
“This is somewhat unsurprising considering that correctability directly refers to the requirement of having an appeal process in place [62].”
From Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability (2023) · cites this paper as [62]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,004
Service failures in online double deviation scenarios: justice theory approach
Lee, E. J., & Park, J. (2010) · Managing Service Quality · doi:10.1108/09604521011011621 · Cited by 61
Reisig, M. D. (2007) · Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice · doi:10.1093/police/pam036 · Cited by 58
Privacy, trust, and justice considerations for location‐based mobile telecommunication services
Chen, V., Ross, W. H., & Huang, S. F. (2008) · Info · doi:10.1108/14636690810887526 · Cited by 57
Moon, K.-K. (2017) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/0091026017702610 · Cited by 78
“Leventhal (1980) proposed that individuals use various criteria to assess decision-making procedures to judge whether the procedures are fair or unfair.”
BackgroundRighting a wrong: Retaliation on a voodoo doll symbolizing an abusive supervisor restores justice
Liang, L. H., Brown, D. J., Lian, H., Hanig, S., Ferris, D. L., & Keeping, L. M. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.01.004 · Cited by 65
“This fundamental concern for justice is central to early theories of distributive and procedural justice (Leventhal, 1980; Thibaut & Walker, 1975), which suggest that people care about the fair allocation of resources and the use of fair procedures, because these outcomes serve instrumental…”
BackgroundBorry, E. L., DeHart‐Davis, L., Kaufmann, W., Merritt, C. C., Mohr, Z. T., & Tummers, L. G. (2018) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12407 · Cited by 66
“Beyond green tape, consistency has been associated with quality federal regulation (Bertelli & Whitford, 2009), optimal policy planning (Kydland & Prescott, 1977), and procedural justice perceptions among key stakeholders (Leventhal, 1980).”
Dong, L. N. T., & Phuong, N. N. D. (2018) · Journal of Asian Finance Economics and Business · doi:10.13106/jafeb.2018.vol5.no3.113 · Cited by 63
“The components of organizational justice have often been divided into three aspects: distributive justice, procedural justice and interactional justice (Leventhal, 1980; Bies & Moag, 1986; Masterson, Lewis, Goldman, & Taylor, 2000; Cropanzano Rupp, Mohler, & Schminke, 2001; Iqbal, 2013).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPERSONALITY AS A MODERATOR IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FAIRNESS AND RETALIATION.
Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R. G., & Tesluk, P. E. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256877 · Cited by 582
INFLUENCES ON MANAGERIAL PAY ALLOCATIONS: A DEPENDENCY PERSPECTIVE
Bartol, K. M., & MARTIN, D. C. (1988) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb02390.x · Cited by 58
Justice and organizational punishment: Attitudinal outcomes of disciplinary events
Ball, G. A., Treviño, L. K., & Sims, H. P. (1993) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/bf01048732 · Cited by 58
Self-esteem and outcome fairness: Differential importance of procedural and outcome considerations.
Vermunt, R. C., van Knippenberg, D., van Knippenberg, B., & Blaauw, E. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.621 · Cited by 62
“Procedural fairness has primarily been studied in relationship to considerations about different aspects of the procedure, such as the accuracy and consistency with which the procedure is applied (Leventhal, 1980) or the respect shown to the individual that is the subject of the procedure (Tyler, Degoey, & Smith, 1996…”
BackgroundMethodFolger, N., Brosi, P., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., & Welpe, I. M. (2021) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-021-09770-3 · Cited by 75
“…ensure that decisions are based on accurate information, do not have mechanisms to ensure the accuracy of decisions, do not conform to ethical or moral standards, or do not ensure that the opinions of all groups affected by the decision have been considered (Colquitt et al., 2001; Leventhal, 1980).”
BackgroundJust world beliefs, perceived stress, and health behavior: The impact of a procedurally just world∗
Lucas, T., Alexander, S., Firestone, I. J., & LeBreton, J. M. (2008) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870440701456020 · Cited by 57
“…justice interventions might include systematic attempts to convince individuals that they possess ‘process control’ (i.e., voice) in the decisions that affect their lives (Thibaut & Walker, 1975), or that important others are effective in behaving consistently and without bias (Leventhal, 1980).”
BackgroundMcNall, L. A., & Roch, S. G. (2007) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00179.x · Cited by 63
“The first factor explained an average of 38.3% of the variance across the four types of monitoring and contained items focusing on accuracy, bias suppression, and consistency, which are procedural justice factors identified by Leventhal (1980).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Interactive Effects of Ex Post Goal Adjustment and Goal Difficulty on Performance
Kelly, K. O., Webb, R. A., & Vance, T. W. (2014) · Journal of Management Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jmar-50729 · Cited by 55
The Association of Distributive and Procedural Justice With Organizational Citizenship Behavior
Lambert, E. G., & Hogan, N. L. (2013) · The Prison Journal · doi:10.1177/0032885513490491 · Cited by 64
“Transparency and consistency in processes and procedures are needed (Lambert et al., 2007; Leventhal, 1980), and favoritism must be avoided.”
BackgroundReliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Organizational Justice Questionnaire
Inoue, A., Kawakami, N., Tsutsumi, A., Shimazu, A., Tsuchiya, M., Ishizaki, M., Tabata, M., Akiyama, M. O., Kitazume, A., Kuroda, M., et al. (2009) · Journal of Occupational Health · doi:10.1539/joh.l8042 · Cited by 56
Organizational justice in sport
Mahony, D. F., Hums, M. A., Andrew, D. P. S., & Dittmore, S. W. (2009) · Sport Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.smr.2009.10.002 · Cited by 57
Complementary arrangements of organizational factors and outcomes of negotiated transfer price
Ghosh, D. (2000) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(99)00060-4 · Cited by 57
“Judgment of fairness is in ̄uenced by the surrounding environment (Leventhal, 1980), such as policies, and their outcomes (Miceli, 1993; Miceli & Lane, 1991).”
BackgroundRupp, D. E., & Paddock, E. L. (2010) · Research on managing groups and teams · doi:10.1108/s1534-0856(2010)0000013012 · Cited by 59
Deeper, broader, longer transitional justice
Nickson, R., & Braithwaite, J. B. (2013) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370813505954 · Cited by 59
“Procedural justice has been conceived in the literature as having a number of facets – including consistency, correctability, decision accuracy, impartiality, ethicality and process control – but these facets tend to be moderately highly intercorrelated (Leventhal, 1980; Lind and Tyler, 1988).”
BackgroundTax Fairness: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Measurement
Farrar, J. M., Massey, D. W., Osecki, E., & Thorne, L. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4001-4 · Cited by 64
“Procedural fairness is the fairness of processes leading to outcomes (Thibault and Walker 1975; Leventhal 1980).”
Myyry, L., Karaharju‐Suvanto, T., Virtala, A., Raekallio, M. R., Salminen, O., Vesalainen, M., & Nevgi, A. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1887812 · Cited by 61
The Effects of Organizational Justice and Ethical Climate on Perceived Work Related Stress
Sert, A., Elçi, M., Uslu, T., et al. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.134 · Cited by 56
“In addition they judge whether the decision making procedures which are used by organization are fair or not (Greenberg, 1986; Leventhal, 1980; Thibaut and Walker, 1975 in Judge and Colquitt, 2004:395).”
BackgroundPerceptions of Justice and the Human Rights Protect, Respect, and Remedy Framework
Murphy, M. W., & Gabriel, J. V. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1821-0 · Cited by 55
Liu, Y., & Berry, C. M. (2012) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1554-5 · Cited by 61
Ramaswami, S. N., Srinivasan, S. S., & Gorton, S. A. (1997) · Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.1997.10754098 · Cited by 58
Is the Tenure Process Fair? What Faculty Think
Lawrence, J. H., Celis, S., & Ott, M. (2014) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1353/jhe.2014.0010 · Cited by 78
When Apologies for Injustice Matter
David De Cremer, A., & Schouten, B. C. (2008) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.4.239 · Cited by 55
Merit Pay Fairness, Leader-Member Exchange, and Job Engagement
Meng, F., & Wu, J. (2012) · Review of Public Personnel Administration · doi:10.1177/0734371x12453057 · Cited by 56
“By definition, procedural fairness includes a fair, visible policy in decision making, giving employees “the opportunity to participate in a decision-making procedure” (Judge & Colquitt, 2004; Leventhal, 1980; Thibaut & Walker, 1975).”
BackgroundExamining the Impact of the Freddie Gray Unrest on Perceptions of the Police
White, C., Weisburd, D. L., & Wire, S. E. (2018) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12404 · Cited by 55
Joint Contract–Function Effects on BIM-Enabled EPC Project Performance
Lee, C.-Y., Chong, H., Li, Q., & Wang, X. (2020) · Journal of Construction Engineering and Management · doi:10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001766 · Cited by 58
“Procedural fairness not 241 only pertains to material outcomes but also to the process used to reach those outcomes 242 (Leventhal 1980).”
BackgroundSocial Comparison and Fairness
Folger, R. G., & Kass, E. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4237-7_20 · Cited by 57
Influence of Role and Gender on the Use of Distributive Versus Procedural Justice Principles
Tata, J. (2000) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00223980009600866 · Cited by 56
“Theories of proceduratjustice (Greenberg, 1990; Greenberg & Folger, 1983; Leventhal, 1980; Leventhal, Karuza, & Fry, 1980; Thibaut & Walker, 1975; Vler, 1989) refer to the fairness of the procedures that result in outcomes such as pay raises.”
BackgroundFairness concepts and the intrahousehold allocation of resources
Farmer, A., & Tiefenthaler, J. (1995) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-3878(95)00009-f · Cited by 56
Perceived marketing–sales relationship effectiveness: a matter of justice
Hulland, J. S., Nenkov, G. Y., & Barclay, D. W. (2011) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-011-0257-2 · Cited by 57
“Starting with the work of Thibaut and Walker (1975) and Leventhal and colleagues (Leventhal 1980; Leventhal, Karuza, and Fry 1980), there has been a trend in organizational justice work towards emphasizing the fairness of allocation processes (Cohen-Charash and Spector 2001).”
Victim Satisfaction with Criminal Justice: A Systematic Review
Laxminarayan, M., Bosmans, M. W. G., Porter, R., & Sosa, L. (2013) · Victims & Offenders · doi:10.1080/15564886.2012.763198 · Cited by 62
Lehmann‐Willenbrock, N., Grohmann, A., & Kauffeld, S. (2012) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00488.x · Cited by 60
Exploring the Boundaries of Career Calling
Chen, J., May, D. R., Schwoerer, C. E., & Augelli, B. (2016) · Journal of Career Development · doi:10.1177/0894845316671214 · Cited by 61
“Procedural justice was measured with 7 items adapted for our research context from Levanthal (1980) and Lambert, Hogan, and Griffin (2007; e.g., ‘‘The standards used to hire new employees are fair and objective.’’ and ‘‘The procedures for promotions are applied consistently across employees.’’).”
MethodCole, N. D., & Flint, D. H. (2004) · Journal of Managerial Psychology · doi:10.1108/02683940410520646 · Cited by 55
“Process control includes voice, consistency of procedures, and use of accurate information for decision-making ( Leventhal, 1980”
MethodExchange Ideology as a Moderator of the Procedural Justice-Satisfaction Relationship
Witt, L. A., & Broach, D. M. (1993) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.1993.9712122 · Cited by 52
Towards an Integration of Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, and Social Resource Theories
Törnblom, K., & Vermunt, R. C. (2007) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1007/s11211-007-0054-8 · Cited by 57
Burnout em professores universitários: impacto de percepções de justiça e comprometimento afetivo
de Sousa, I. F., & Mendonça, H. (2009) · Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa · doi:10.1590/s0102-37722009000400005 · Cited by 53
Creating Sustainable Corporate Value: A Case Study of Stakeholder Relationship Management in China
Cai, Z., & Wheale, P. (2004) · Business and Society Review · doi:10.1111/j.0045-3609.2004.00208.x · Cited by 59
Grootelaar, H. A. M., & van den Bos, K. (2018) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.1111/lasr.12315 · Cited by 53
“Indeed, the consistency over time rule prescribes that people want the same procedural rules to be applied at different times (Leventhal 1980).”
BackgroundWhen it's time to stop writing policies: an inquiry into procedural injustice
Cropanzano, R., & Byrne, Z. S. (2001) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/s1053-4822(00)00039-5 · Cited by 54
Moral Reasoning and the Use of Procedural Justice Rules in Hypothetical and Real-Life Dilemmas
Myyry, L., & Helkama, K. (2002) · Social Justice Research · doi:10.1023/a:1021271108440 · Cited by 53
Jepsen, D. M., & Rodwell, J. (2009) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190903175639 · Cited by 53
“Distributive justice refers to judgments of fair distribution (Leventhal 1980) and tends to focus on outcomes.”
BackgroundInfluentialvan Prooijen, J., Ståhl, T., Eek, D., & Lange, P. A. M. V. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167212448826 · Cited by 53
“For instance, Leventhal (1980) also noted that procedures should be accurate in that decision makers ought to take all relevant information into account before making a decision.”
BackgroundInfluentialFairness matters when responding to disasters: An experimental study of government legitimacy
Mazepus, H., & van Leeuwen, F. (2019) · Governance · doi:10.1111/gove.12440 · Cited by 60
“…formal rules for a decision-making process, transparency, and unbiased and impartial decision making (De Fine Licht, Naurin, Esaiasson, & Gilljam, 2014; Leventhal, 1980; Peter, 2009; Schmidt, 2013; Thibaut & Walker, 1975; Tyler, 2000; Tyler & Rasinski, 1991; Tyler, Rasinski, & Spodick, 1985).”
BackgroundTo Shift or Not to Shift? Determinants and Consequences of Phase Shifting on Justice Judgments
Soenen, G., Melkonian, T., & Ambrose, M. L. (2016) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0181 · Cited by 55
Organizational justice and work outcomes in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq
Arab, H. R., & Atan, T. (2018) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-04-2017-0405 · Cited by 58
“People with low power distance tolerance probably experience greater resentment and discontent toward their managers, and respond more strongly to procedural injustice, which refers to the amount of voice, control, or influence individuals have in decisions made regarding outcome or reward distribution (Leventhal, 198…”
BackgroundInfluentialAlghababsheh, M., Gallear, D., & Rahman, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-3993-0 · Cited by 50
“Nevertheless, suppliers may not use all of the criteria to judge the fairness of a particular procedure, but instead might choose to allocate weights to and apply different criteria in different situations (Leventhal 1980).”
BackgroundA model of employee responses to drug-testing programs
Crant, J. M., & Bateman, T. S. (1989) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/bf01423476 · Cited by 52
Perceived fairness of and satisfaction with employee performance appraisal
Walsh, M. (2003) · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.3380 · Cited by 51
“However, when raters are perceived to be driven to conform to other distribution norms such as equality, need, or social status (Leventhal, 1980) they may produce ratings that are not congruent with the prevailing equity norms and may be perceived to be unfair.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUnequal but Fair: Incorporating Distributive Justice in Operational Allocation Models
Rea, D., Froehle, C. M., Masterson, S. S., Stettler, B. A., Fermann, G. J., & Pancioli, A. (2021) · Production and Operations Management · doi:10.1111/poms.13369 · Cited by 51
“…concept in the management of organizations (Adams 1963, 1965, Cropan-zano et al. 2015, Greenberg and Colquitt 2005, Kahneman et al. ,1986a, 1986b, Leventhal 1980), and is often embedded within the larger study of organizational justice, or “the perceived adherence to rules that reflect…”
BackgroundMiller, E. C., Reigh, E. V., Berland, L. K., & Krajcik, J. S. (2021) · Journal of Science Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1046560x.2021.1873549 · Cited by 68
“In conceptualizing equity in virtual instruction, we associate equity with fairness in access and opportunity (Lee, 1999, 2003; Leventhal, 1980).”
BackgroundMsenge, P., & Nzewi, O. I. (2021) · Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation · doi:10.4102/jolgri.v2i0.26 · Cited by 52
Female Perceptions of Organizational Justice
Jepsen, D. M., & Rodwell, J. (2010) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2010.00538.x · Cited by 52
Organizational justice and conflict: Do perceptions of fairness influence disagreement?
Kerwin, S., Jordan, J. S., & Turner, B. A. (2014) · Sport Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.smr.2014.10.005 · Cited by 56
Achieving Ethics and Fairness in Hiring: Going Beyond the Law
Alder, G. S., & Gilbert, J. T. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9039-z · Cited by 68
“According to the consistency rule of procedural justice, fairness requires that procedures be applied consistently across people and across time (Leventhal, 1980).”
BackgroundInfluentialWenzel, M., & Jobling, P. (2006) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.298 · Cited by 51
“First, consistency of power use can be construed as an issue of procedural fairness (Leventhal, 1980), and as such we can derive predictions from Tyler’s group value model of procedural justice that links the fairness motive to social identity (Lind & Tyler, 1988; Tyler & Lind, 1992; Tyler,…”
BackgroundKim, H.-S. (2008) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9964-0 · Cited by 56
Social Power and Attitude Strength Over the Life Course
Eaton, A. A., Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Anand, S. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167209349114 · Cited by 51
Son, S., Kim, D., & Kim, M. (2014) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12038 · Cited by 54
Michel, J. S., & Hargis, M. B. (2016) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-016-9584-4 · Cited by 64
The relationship between organizational justice and job satisfaction
Hao, Y., Hao, J., & Wang, X. (2016) · Journal of Chinese Human Resource Management · doi:10.1108/jchrm-07-2016-0012 · Cited by 52
Effect of Ethical Leadership and Interactional Justice on Employee Work Attitudes
Charoensap, A., Virakul, B., Senasu, K., & Ayman, R. (2018) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1002/jls.21574 · Cited by 63
Kim, S. J., & Chung, E. K. (2018) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.11.001 · Cited by 59
Exploring the association between fairness and organisational outcomes in supply chain relationships
Hornibrook, S., Fearne, A. P., & Lazzarin, M. (2009) · International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management · doi:10.1108/09590550910975826 · Cited by 53
A Model of Fair Process and Its Limits
Wu, Y., Loch, C. H., & der Heyden, L. V. (2008) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.1070.0189 · Cited by 52
“This literature has defined fair process by six characteristics that engender a perception of fairness on the side of those affected by a decision process (Leventhal 1980; Lind and Tyler 1988; Kim and Mauborgne 1991, 1997).”
BackgroundOrganisational Justice: A Senian Perspective
Shrivastava, S., Jones, R. G., Selvarajah, C., & Gramberg, B. V. (2014) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-014-2466-3 · Cited by 52
Reputational Implications of Procedural Fairness for Personal and Relational Self-Esteem
Cremer, D. D., & Sedikides, C. (2008) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973530701866557 · Cited by 50
“For this reason, future research will need to replicate our findings with alternative manipulations of procedural fairness, such as accuracy, bias suppression, or ethicality (Leventhal, 1980).”
BackgroundPerceived pay communication, justice and pay satisfaction
Day, N. E. (2011) · Employee Relations · doi:10.1108/01425451111153862 · Cited by 51
Jenny, A., Fuentes, F. H., & Mosler, H. (2006) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-006-9053-x · Cited by 52
“different criteria of procedural justice have been introduced, such as "process control" and "decision control" (Thibaut and Walker, 1975), or "consistency", "bias suppression", "accuracy of information", "correctability", "ethicality", and "representation" (Leventhal, 1980; Leventhal et al, 1980).”
BackgroundLi, Y. (2014) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-014-9192-3 · Cited by 50
Gollwitzer, M., & van Prooijen, J. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3216-0_4 · Cited by 64
Gobena, L. B., & van Dijke, M. (2017) · Journal of Economic Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.005 · Cited by 61
van Dijke, M., Cremer, D. D., Langendijk, G., & Anderson, C. P. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000260 · Cited by 55
Students’ critical incidents of fairness in classroom assessment: an empirical study
Rasooli, A., DeLuca, C., Rasegh, A., & Fathi, S. (2019) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-019-09491-9 · Cited by 52
“In relation to procedural justice, previous conceptualization of fairness organizations (Kazemi and Tornbolm, 2008; Leventhal, 1980) identified principles of accuracy, consistency, bias suppression, voice, correctability, and ethicality.”
BackgroundMethodIncome Inequality and its Consequences within the Framework of Social Justice
Mishchuk, H., Samoliuk, N., Bilan, Y. V., et al. (2018) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 51
Negative Online Word-of-Mouth: Consumers’ Retaliation in the Digital World
Filho, E. J. M. A., & Barcelos, A. D. A. (2020) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2020.1775919 · Cited by 54
Sharing economy platforms: An equity theory perspective on reciprocity and commitment
Davlembayeva, D., Papagiannidis, S., & Alamanos, E. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.039 · Cited by 59
Hunton, J. E. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01830.x · Cited by 51
Moorman, R. H., & Wells, D. L. (2003) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/107179190301000202 · Cited by 51
“1994; Moorman, 1991; Moorman, Blakely, & Niehoff, 1998; Niehoff & Moorman, 1993; Organ & Moorman, 1993). Organ (1988) and others have explained this relationship as the result of the norm of reciprocity (Gouldner, 1960) where employees would seek to reciprocate fair treatment with some form of increased participation…”
BackgroundDavid De Cremer, A., & Alberts, H. J. E. M. (2004) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.201 · Cited by 48
Management and Governance Processes in Community Health Coalitions: A Procedural Justice Perspective
Weiner, B. J., Alexander, J. A., & Shortell, S. M. (2002) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/109019802237941 · Cited by 51
“Furthermore, fairness perceptions are enhanced when decision-making procedures and criteria are clearly developed and understood by all participants.(25) In coalitions, participants are likely to view clear, consistent decision-making processes as fair because such processes create a level playing field.”
BackgroundReference Points and Redistributive Preferences: Experimental Evidence
Charité, J., Fisman, R. J., & Kuziemko, I. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21009 · Cited by 50
“As Leventhal (1980) notes, the procedural justice “rule of adhering to commitments...dictates that fairness is violated unless persons receive that which has been promised to them.””
BackgroundJiang, Z., DeHart‐Davis, L., & Borry, E. L. (2022) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13494 · Cited by 49
Choung, H., Seberger, J. S., & David, P. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2266244 · Cited by 73
“Fairness is often assessed with equality (i.e., procedural fairness, see Leventhal, 1980) and equity (i.e., distributive fairness, see Deutsch, 1975) in treating and evaluating other people.”
Chory, R. M., Vela, L. E., & Avtgis, T. Ä. (2015) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/s10672-015-9267-4 · Cited by 50
“In the organizational context, procedures perceived as consistently applied, unbiased, accurate, correctable, representing the best interest of superiors and subordinates, and meeting ethical standards tend to be considered fair (Leventhal 1980).”
BackgroundTrust, Satisfaction and Loyalty in Customer Relationship Management
Wetsch, L. R. (2006) · Journal of Relationship Marketing · doi:10.1300/j366v04n03_03 · Cited by 50
“Research has suggested that the higher the level of instrumental voice, the higher the individuals’ perceptions of procedural justice (Buttle, 1996; Folger, 1977; Leventhal, 1980; Lind & Tyler, 1988).”
BackgroundMcIntyre, R. M., Bartle, S. A., Landis, D., & Dansby, M. R. (2002) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1404_5 · Cited by 50
“Currently, organizational justice theory centers around two primary aspects of justice, each with its own set of “rules” regarding fairness (see Greenberg, 1990; Leventhal, 1980; Thibaut & Walker, 1975).”
BackgroundFabio, A. D., & Palazzeschi, L. (2012) · Journal of Employment Counseling · doi:10.1002/j.2161-1920.2012.00004.x · Cited by 51
Sharoni, G., Tziner, A. E., Fein, E. C., Shultz, T., Shaul, K., & Zilberman, L. (2012) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01015.x · Cited by 53
Who Delivers Justice? Source Perceptions of Procedural Fairness1
Cobb, A. T., Vest, M., & Hills, F. (1997) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00284.x · Cited by 49
Tremblay, M., & Roussel, P. (2001) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/713769672 · Cited by 51
Fairness Perceptions and Compliance Behaviour: Taxpayers' Judgments in Self-Assessment Environments
Saad, N. (2011) · UC Research Repository (University of Canterbury) · doi:10.26021/5567 · Cited by 50
Chen, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, J., Liu, C., Zhang, X., & Yu, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039375 · Cited by 105
Jiao, H., & Zhao, G. (2013) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12123 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Leventhal, G. S.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Leventhal, Gerald S.
- ORCID
- Leventhal, Gerald S.
- Venue
- Social Exchange
- Publisher
- Springer US
- Published
- 1980
- Pages
- 27-55
- OpenAlex
- W1526225581
- Cited by
- 3,010
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 130 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 114 · 2023: 122 · 2022: 168 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 153 · 2019: 124 · 2018: 137 · 2017: 133 · 2016: 124 · 2015: 114 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 129
- FWCI
- 16.34
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- equity theory, reward allocation, resource allocation, social systems, organizational justice, punishment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
