CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 139Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Structural Organization of Cingulate Cortex: Areas, Neurons, and Somatodendritic Transmitter Receptors

Vogt, Brent A.·1993·Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-6704-6_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Although cingulate cortex is one of the largest components of the limbic system, it has remained an enigma to neuroscientists over the past century. This is because the structure of cingulate cortex undergoes complex transitions and many of its connections do not conform to the “rules” of neocortical organization. Moreover, it is difficult to access the medial surface of the cerebral cortex, and so cingulate cortex has remained largely silent in functional and neurological assessments. Its role in responses to noxious stimuli, movement, vocalization, motivation, and learning and memory only now is becoming apparent. Positron emission tomography studies of cerebral blood flow and metabolism are now exposing cingulate cortex to clinical assessments that were not previously feasible with electroencephalo-graphic techniques. These studies show important roles for cingulate cortex in attention and responses to painful stimuli, and they have confirmed in vitro findings of high opioid receptor binding. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4899-6704-6_2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The psychological constructionist hypothesis draws on neuroscience literature showing that pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, and anterior midcingulate cortex take part in distinct psychological operations related to realizing core affect.

    “Our psychological constructionist hypothesis draws on the neuroscience literature showing that pACC, sACC, and the more dorsal anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC) (Vogt 1993; Vogt et al. 2003) take part in distinct psychological operations related to realizing core affect.”

    From The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review (2012) · cites this paper as Vogt 1993

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vogt, B. A.
Affiliations
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
Corresponding author
Vogt, Brent A.
ORCID
Vogt, Brent A.
Venue
Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus
Publisher
Birkhäuser Boston
Published
1993
Pages
19-70
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4899-6704-6_2
OpenAlex
W64507850
Cited by
139
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.58
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Birkhäuser Boston eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
cingulate cortex, limbic system, cortical organization, neuropeptides, opioid receptors, attention, pain response, cerebral blood flow, brain metabolism, positron emission tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review