Cited by 129RNA Interference and Gene DeliveryImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Nucleoside modified mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases

Pardi, Norbert, Weissman, Drew·2017·Methods in molecular biology

Abstract

In recent years, numerous studies have demonstrated the outstanding abilities of mRNA to elicit potent immune responses against pathogens, making it a viable new platform for vaccine development (reviewed in Weissman, Expert Rev Vaccines 14:265-281, 2015; Sahin et al., Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:759-780, 2014). The incorporation of modified nucleosides in mRNA has many advantages and is currently undergoing a renaissance in the field of therapeutic protein delivery. Its use in a vaccine against infectious diseases has only begun to be described, but offers advantages for the generation of potent and long-lived antibody responses. FPLC purification and substitution of modified nucleosides in the mRNA make it non-inflammatory and highly translatable (Kariko et al., Immunity 23:165-175, 2005; Kariko et al., Mol Ther 16:1833-1840, 2008; Kariko et al., Nucleic Acids Research 39:e142, 2011) that are crucial features for therapeutic relevance. Formulation of the mRNA in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) protects it from degradation enabling high levels of protein production for extended periods of time (Pardi et al., J Control Release, 2015). Here, we describe a simple vaccination method using LNP-encapsulated 1-methylpseudouridine-containing FPLC purified mRNA in mice. Furthermore, we describe the evaluation of antigen-specific T and B cell responses elicited by this vaccine format.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-4939-6481-9_6

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Upscaling of cell-free vaccine production is relatively straightforward, providing a cutting-edge tool for rapid response in epidemics and pandemics.

    “Furthermore, the upscaling of cell-free vaccine production is relatively straightforward, thereby providing a cutting-edge tool for rapid response in epidemics and pandemics.4, 5, 6, 7”

    From COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: Platforms and current developments (2022) · cites this paper as [7]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pardi, N., & Weissman, D.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Weissman, Drew
Venue
Methods in molecular biology
Published
2016-12-17
Volume
1499
Pages
109-121
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W2565551608
Cited by
129
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7
FWCI
9.04
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
mRNA vaccines, modified nucleosides, lipid nanoparticles, infectious disease vaccines, antibody response, T cell response, B cell response, immunogenicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibody Formation, B-Lymphocytes, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Communicable Diseases, Lipids, Nucleosides, Pseudouridine, RNA, Messenger, T-Lymphocytes, Vaccination, Vaccines, Mice, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review