Cited by 42Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsEpigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

Single-Neuron Transcriptome and Methylome Sequencing for Epigenomic Analysis of Aging

Open access
Moroz, Leonid L., Kohn, Andrea B.·2013·Methods in Molecular Biology

Abstract

Enormous heterogeneity in transcription and signaling is the feature that slows down progress in our understanding of the mechanisms of normal aging and age-related diseases. This is critical for neurobiology of aging where the enormous diversity of neuronal populations presents a significant challenge in experimental design. Here, we introduce Aplysia as a model for genomic analysis of aging at the single-cell level and provide protocols for integrated transcriptome and methylome profiling of individually identified neurons during the aging process. These single-cell RNA-seq and DNA methylation assays (methyl-capture/methyl enrichment) are compatible with all major next generation sequencing platforms (we used Roche/454 and SOLiD/Life Technologies as illustrative examples) and can be used to integrate an epigenetic signature with transcriptional output. The described sequencing library construction protocol provides both quantitative and directional information from transcriptional profiling of individual cells. Our results also confirm that different copies of DNA in polyploid Aplysia neurons behave similarly with respect to their DNA methylation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-1-62703-556-9_21

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A reduced representation sequencing protocol for 454 and Ion Torrent platforms can detect low abundance transcripts, reduces the amount of sequencing, and gives more accurate quantification.

    “We developed a reduced representation sequencing protocol for the 454 and Ion Torrent sequencing platforms that can detect low abundance transcripts 47 . The method reduces the amount of sequencing and gives more accurate quantification and additional details of the procedure are reported elsewhere 47,48 .”

    From The ctenophore genome and the evolutionary origins of neural systems (2014) · cites this paper as [48]

    Methods §4.3 describes a single-neuron RNA-seq library protocol for 454 sequencing, and §4.4 says RNA-seq can detect very low-abundance RNAs and describes validation of quantification. The copy does not establish that this protocol is for Ion Torrent, reduces the amount of sequencing, or gives more accurate quantification than an alternative; §4.4 instead associates low-abundance detection with high sampling. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [47]Moroz LL Kohn AB 2010 Do different neurons age differently? Direct genome-wide analysis of aging in single identified cholinergic neurons Front Aging Neurosci 2 6 10.3389/neuro.24.006.2010 20725513 PMC2910937 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moroz, L. L., & Kohn, A. B.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Venue
Methods in Molecular Biology
Publisher
Humana Press
Published
2013
Volume
1048
Pages
323-352
ISSN
  • 1064-3745 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6029
OpenAlex
W1918583492
Cited by
42
References
60
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.50
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methods in molecular biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH097062)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21DA030118)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM097502)
  • National Center for Research Resources (R21RR025699)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
aging, Aplysia, DNA methylation, single-cell RNA sequencing, neuronal heterogeneity, polyploidy, epigenomics, age-related diseases, sequencing library construction
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Aplysia, Base Sequence, Neurons, Sequence Analysis, RNA, DNA Methylation, Gene Expression Profiling, Epigenomics, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review