Cited by 202Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAI in cancer detectionDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging

Federated Learning for Breast Density Classification: A Real-World Implementation

Open access
Roth, Holger R., Chang, Ken, Singh, Praveer, Neumark, Nir, Li, Wenqi, Gupta, Vikash, Gupta, Sharut, Qu, Liangqiong +35 more·2020·Lecture Notes in Computer Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-60548-3_18

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Real-world implementation of FL for medical imaging for breast density classification performs 6.3% on average better than standalone training approaches.

    “The real-world implementation of FL for medical imaging is also presented in [108] for breast density classification, showing that the FL scheme can perform 6.3% on average better than standalone training approaches.”

    From Federated learning for smart healthcare: A survey (2023) · cites this paper as [108]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [16]16. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., y Arcas, B.A.: Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. In: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. pp. 1273-1282 (2017)
  2. [20]20. Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletari, F., Roth, H., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M.N., Landman, B., Maier-Hein, K., et al.: The future of digital health with federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2003.08119 (2020) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roth, H. R., Chang, K., Singh, P., Neumark, N., Li, W., Gupta, V., Gupta, S., Qu, L., Ihsani, A., Bizzo, B. C., Wen, Y., Buch, V., Shah, M., Kitamura, F., Mendonça, M., Lavor, V., Harouni, A., Compas, C., Tetreault, J., Dogra, P., Cheng, Y., Erdal, S., White, R., Hashemian, B., Schultz, T., Zhang, M., McCarthy, A., Yun, B. M., Sharaf, E., Hoebel, K. V., Patel, J. B., Chen, B., Ko, S., Leibovitz, E., Pisano, E. D., Coombs, L., Xu, D., Dreyer, K. J., Dayan, I., Naidu, R. C., Flores, M., Rubin, D., & Kalpathy-Cramer, J.
Affiliations
  • Nvidia (United States) (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • American College of Radiology (US)
  • DASA (Brazil) (BR)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Roth, Holger R.
Venue
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Published
2020
Pages
181-191
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W3083403771
Cited by
202
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 21
FWCI
11.17
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Keywords
federated learning, breast density classification, BI-RADS, mammography, cross-institutional collaboration, model generalization, data privacy, deep learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review