Cited by 796Microplastics and Plastic PollutionAnalytical chemistry methods developmentPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Methodology Used for the Detection and Identification of Microplastics—A Critical Appraisal

Open access
Löder, Martin G. J., Gerdts, Gunnar·2015·Marine Anthropogenic Litter

Abstract

Microplastics in aquatic ecosystems and especially in the marine environment represent a pollution of increasing scientific and societal concern, thus, recently a substantial number of studies on microplastics were published. Although first steps towards a standardization of methodologies used for the detection and identification of microplastics in environmental samples are made, the comparability of data on microplastics is currently hampered by a huge variety of different methodologies, which result in the generation of data of extremely different quality and resolution. This chapter reviews the methodology presently used for assessing the concentration of microplastics in the marine environment with a focus on the most convenient techniques and approaches. After an overview of non-selective sampling approaches, sample processing and treatment in the laboratory, the reader is introduced to the currently applied techniques for the identification and quantification of microplastics. The subsequent case study on microplastics in sediment samples from the North Sea measured with focal plane array (FPA)-based micro-Fourier transform infrared (micro-FTIR) spectroscopy shows that only 1.4 % of the particles visually resembling microplastics were of synthetic polymer origin. This finding emphasizes the importance of verifying the synthetic polymer origin of potential microplastics. Thus, a burning issue concerning current microplastic research is the generation of standards that allow for the assessment of reliable data on concentrations of microscopic plastic particles and the involved polymers with analytical laboratory techniques such as micro-FTIR or micro-Raman spectroscopy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_8

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies looking at environmental samples are constrained by methods that detect larger particles (e.g., LODs of spectroscopy are generally >10μm), while many laboratory studies testing effects look at smaller particles.

    “most studies looking at environmental samples are constrained by methods that detect larger particles (e.g., LODs of spectroscopy are generally >10μm),71 many laboratory studies testing effects look at smaller particles.72”

    From Microplastics and Anthropogenic Particles in Recreationally Caught Freshwater Fish from an Urbanized Region of the North American Great Lakes (2024) · cites this paper as [71]

    Section 8.2.1 says commonly used sampling nets do not quantitatively collect particles below 300 µm, supporting the claim that environmental studies often miss smaller particles. Section 8.4.2.4 gives a roughly 10 µm resolution for micro-FTIR, but section 8.4.2.3 says micro-Raman can identify particles below 1 µm; the paper therefore does not support a general spectroscopy limit above 10 µm. The separately cited statement about laboratory effects studies is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Löder, M.G.J., Kuczera, M., Mintenig, S., Lorenz, C., & Gerdts, G. (2015). FPA-based micro- FTIR imaging for the analysis of microplastics in environmental samples. Environmental Chemistry, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Löder, M. G. J., & Gerdts, G.
Affiliations
Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE)
Corresponding author
Löder, Martin G. J.
Venue
Marine Anthropogenic Litter
Published
2015
Pages
201-227
OpenAlex
W1936293037
Cited by
796
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 96 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 7
FWCI
38.99
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
microplastics, microplastic detection, microplastic quantification, marine microplastic pollution, North Sea sediments, FTIR microspectroscopy, micro-Raman spectroscopy, sample processing, method standardization, data comparability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review