Cited by 46Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The Intracortical Visual Prosthesis Project

Troyk, Philip R.·2017·Artificial Vision

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-41876-6_16

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Troyk, P. R.
Affiliations
Illinois Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Troyk, Philip R.
Venue
Artificial Vision
Published
2016-11-25
Pages
203-214
OpenAlex
W2555494543
Cited by
45
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
brain-computer interface, visual prosthesis, blindness, intracortical electrodes, object recognition, navigation, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review