Cited by 28Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesNeurological Complications and SyndromesGestational Diabetes Research and Management

Risk Factors for Preeclampsia

Shiozaki, Arihiro, Saito, Shigeru·2018·Comprehensive Gynecology and Obstetrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-10-5891-2_1

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shiozaki, A., & Saito, S.
Affiliations
University of Toyama (JP)
Corresponding author
Saito, Shigeru
Venue
Comprehensive Gynecology and Obstetrics
Published
2018
Pages
3-25
ISSN
  • 2364-1932 (ISSN-L)
  • 2364-219X
OpenAlex
W2791580513
Cited by
28
References
112
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
26.96
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comprehensive gynecology and obstetrics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Keywords
preeclampsia, risk factors, primiparity, oocyte donation, donor insemination, embryo donation, multiple pregnancy, hydatidiform mole, gestational hypertension, insulin resistance, obesity, maternal age, family history (medicine), genetic susceptibility, cigarette smoking, physical activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review