Language Learning with Technology: Perspectives from Asia

Open access

·2021·Springer eBooks

DOI 10.1007/978-981-16-2697-5

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-16-2697-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Scaffolding in Teacher–Student Interaction: A Decade of Research
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6 · Cited by 1,873
Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning
Schmitt, N. (2008) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/1362168808089921 · Cited by 1,467
ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882231162868 · Cited by 1,371
Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness
Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.700315 · Cited by 1,144
Translanguaging in the classroom: Emerging issues for research and pedagogy
Canagarajah, S. (2011) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/9783110239331.1 · Cited by 984
Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: an exploratory investigation
Yan, D. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4 · Cited by 713
Large language models in education: a focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1 · Cited by 696
AI-generated feedback on writing: insights into efficacy and ENL student preference
Escalante, J., Pack, A., & Barrett, A. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00425-2 · Cited by 589
A systematic review of conversational AI in language education: focusing on the collaboration with human teachers
Ji, H., Han, I., & Ko, Y. (2023) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2022.2142873 · Cited by 394
New skills for new classrooms: Training tutors to teach languages online
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2005) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220500335455 · Cited by 387
Not quite eye to A.I.: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process
Barrett, A., & Pack, A. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00427-0 · Cited by 391
Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study
Mahapatra, S. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9 · Cited by 398
The impact of gamification in educational settings on student learning outcomes: a meta-analysis
Huang, R., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Sommer, M., Zhu, J., Stephen, A., Valle, N., Hampton, J., & Li, J. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09807-z · Cited by 340
Impacts of an AI-based chabot on College students' after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation
Lee, Y.-F., Hwang, G.-J., & Chen, P.-Y. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10142-8 · Cited by 323
The impact of Google Assistant on adolescent EFL learners’ willingness to communicate
Tai, T.-Y., & Chen, H. H.-J. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1841801 · Cited by 302
Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement
Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323 · Cited by 275
Learning English with The Sims: exploiting authentic computer simulation games for L2 learning
Ranalli, J. (2008) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588220802447859 · Cited by 269
Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lin, J.-J., & Lin, H. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359 · Cited by 262
Using automated written corrective feedback in the writing classrooms: effects on L2 writing accuracy
Barrot, J. S. (2023) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2021.1936071 · Cited by 248
Vocabulary learning through viewing video: the effect of two enhancement techniques
Montero Perez, M., Peters, E., & Desmet, P. (2018) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2017.1375960 · Cited by 230
Automated written corrective feedback: how well can students make use of it?
Ranalli, J. (2018) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1428994 · Cited by 228
Exploring students’ generative AI-assisted writing processes: Perceptions and experiences from native and nonnative English speakers
Wang, C. (2025) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3 · Cited by 212
Exploring the impact of using automated writing evaluation in English as a foreign language university students' writing
Wang, Y.-J., Shang, H.-F., & Briody, P. (2013) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2012.655300 · Cited by 185
Computer-assisted second language vocabulary learning in a paired-associate paradigm: a critical investigation of flashcard software
Nakata, T. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.520675 · Cited by 167
Examining EFL teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and the adoption of mobile-assisted language learning: A partial least square approach
Hsu, L. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1278024 · Cited by 164
Indigenous language revitalization, promotion, and education: function of digital technology
Galla, C. K. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2016.1166137 · Cited by 158
The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: a meta-analysis
Chen, Z., Chen, W., Jia, J., & An, H. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09801-5 · Cited by 143
Technology and Motivation in English-Language Teaching and Learning
Stockwell, G. (2013) · International Perspectives on Motivation · doi:10.1057/9781137000873_9 · Cited by 131
Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesis
Chen, T. (2016) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.960942 · Cited by 130
Utilization of artificial intelligence technology in an academic writing class: How do Indonesian students perceive?
Utami, S. P. T., Andayani, A., Winarni, R., & Sumarwati, S. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/13419 · Cited by 124
Native/non-native speaker interactions through video-web communication: a clue for enhancing motivation?
Jauregi, K., de Graaff, R., van den Bergh, H., & Kriz, M. (2012) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.582587 · Cited by 124
Automated writing evaluation systems: A systematic review of Grammarly, Pigai, and Criterion with a perspective on future directions in the age of generative artificial intelligence
Ding, L., & Zou, D. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12402-3 · Cited by 122
The Impact of a Serious Game on Vocabulary and Content Learning
Chen, H.-J. H., & Hsu, H.-L. (2020) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1593197 · Cited by 109
Vocabulary learning through videos: captions, advance-organizer strategy, and their combination
Teng, (. F. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1720253 · Cited by 86
The Vocabulary Knowledge Scale: A Critical Analysis
Bruton, A. (2009) · Language Assessment Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15434300902801909 · Cited by 77
An exploration into the impact of WebQuest-based classroom on EFL learners’ critical thinking and academic writing skills: a mixed-methods study
Ebadi, S., & Rahimi, M. (2018) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1449757 · Cited by 75
Developing early career teachers’ professional digital competence: a systematic literature review
Masoumi, D., & Noroozi, O. (2025) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2023.2229006 · Cited by 79
Negotiating Sociocultural and Institutional Contexts: The Case of Spanish–American Telecollaboration
O'Dowd, R. (2005) · Language and Intercultural Communication · doi:10.1080/14708470508668882 · Cited by 68
Artificial Intelligence and Second Language Learning: An Efficient Approach to Error Remediation
Dodigovic, M. (2007) · Language Awareness · doi:10.2167/la416.0 · Cited by 68
Effects of Peer E-Feedback on Turkish EFL Students' Writing Performance
Ciftci, H., & Kocoglu, Z. (2012) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.46.1.c · Cited by 68
The effect of chatbots on learning: a meta-analysis of empirical research
Alemdag, E. (2025) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2023.2255698 · Cited by 67
A Cross-Disciplinary Examination of the Instructional Uses of ChatGPT in Higher Education
Onal, S., & Kulavuz-Onal, D. (2024) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/00472395231196532 · Cited by 59
Quizlet and podcasts: effects on vocabulary acquisition
Bueno-Alastuey, M. C., & Nemeth, K. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1802601 · Cited by 58
Computer-Mediated Corrective Feedback to Improve L2 Writing Skills: A Meta-Analysis
Mohsen, M. A. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331211064066 · Cited by 56
The Use of Computer-Based Simulation to Aid Comprehension and Incidental Vocabulary Learning
Ali Mohsen, M. (2016) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116639954 · Cited by 56
Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: student feedback and revision in EFL writing
Pham, H. T. P. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530 · Cited by 51
Do AI-generative tools kill or nurture creativity in EFL teaching and learning?
Alzubi, A. A. F., Nazim, M., & Alyami, N. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13409-8 · Cited by 43
Investigating the effectiveness of a digital game-based task on the acquisition of word knowledge
Rasti-Behbahani, A., & Shahbazi, M. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1846567 · Cited by 37
A review of research on technology-enhanced peer feedback for second language writing based on the activity theory framework
Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11469-8 · Cited by 36
The effect of personal learning environments on participants’ higher order thinking skills and satisfaction
Elfeky, A. I. M. (2019) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2018.1534601 · Cited by 33
Training non-native aspirated plosives with hand gestures: learners’ gesture performance matters
Li, P., Xi, X., Baills, F., & Prieto, P. (2021) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2021.1937663 · Cited by 29
Implementation of The Gamification Concept Using KAHOOT!Among TVET Students: An Observation
Ismail, M. E., Sa’adan, N., Samsudin, M. A., Hamzah, N., Razali, N., & Mahazir, I. I. (2018) · Journal of Physics: Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1140/1/012013 · Cited by 25
The impact of mediated learning on the academic writing performance of medical students in flipped and traditional classrooms: scaffolding techniques
Khojasteh, L., Hosseini, S. A., & Nasiri, E. (2021) · Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1186/s41039-021-00165-9 · Cited by 21
A critical deconstruction of computer-based test application in Turkish State University
Ulum, Ö. G. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10199-z · Cited by 17
Supporting postgraduates in research proposals through peer feedback in a Malaysian university
Al Qunayeer, H. S. (2020) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2019.1627299 · Cited by 16
Motivational design for enhancing behavioral engagement in a flipped Chinese course
Zhou, X., Chen, S., Ohno, S., She, J., & Kameda, H. (2024) · Asia Pacific Education Review · doi:10.1007/s12564-023-09849-x · Cited by 12
Comparing Zooming Methods in Mobile Devices: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and User Satisfaction in Touch and Nontouch Smartphones
Garcia-Lopez, E., de-Marcos, L., Garcia-Cabot, A., & Martinez-Herraiz, J.-J. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1064640 · Cited by 10
Generative AI-assisted Collaborative Argumentation: Implications for the Argumentation Process and Outcome
Liu, W., & Cui, X. (2024) · 2024 4th International Conference on Educational Technology (ICET) · doi:10.1109/icet62460.2024.10868171 · Cited by 4

Venue: Springer eBooks
Publisher: Springer Nature Singapore
Published: 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-2697-5
OpenAlex: W2285453998
Cited by: 2,206
References: 0
FWCI: 170.85
Type: book
Language: en
Open access: green
Licence: www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review