Cited by 101Evolution and Genetic DynamicsEvolution and Paleontology StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Very slightly deleterious mutations and the molecular clock

Ohta, Tomoko·1987·Journal of Molecular Evolution

Abstract

The model of very slightly deleterious mutations was examined from the standpoint of population genetics in relation to the molecular evolutionary clock. The distribution of selection coefficients of mutants (in terms of amino acid changes) with small effect is thought to be continuous around zero, with an average negative value. The variance of selection coefficients depends upon environmental diversity and hence on total population size of a species. By considering various examples of amino acid substitutions, the average and standard error of selection coefficients and the reciprocal of population size are assumed to have similar values. The model predicts negative correlation between evolutionary rate and population size. This effect is expected to be partially cancelled with the generation time effect of intrinsic mutation rate. Implications of this prediction on the molecular evolutionary clock are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02111276

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fixation of nearly-neutral alleles of small selective effect is expected to be greatest in small populations.

    “Therefore, the fixation of nearly-neutral alleles of small selective effect is expected to be greatest in small populations 23,24 .”

    From The modern molecular clock (2003) · cites this paper as [23]

  • Tomoko Ohta provided an important extension of the neutral theory by recognizing the crucial role of effective population size in the influence of selection.

    “Tomoko Ohta 22-24 provided an important extension of the neutral theory by recognizing the crucial role of effective population size in the influence of selection.”

    From The modern molecular clock (2003) · cites this paper as [23]

  • A mutation would be effectively neutral if |s| < 1/4N_e, where N_e is the effective population size.

    “So, a mutation would be effectively neutral if |s| &lt; 1/4N e , where N e is the effective population size.”

    From The modern molecular clock (2003) · cites this paper as [23]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohta, T.
Affiliations
National Institute of Genetics (JP)
Corresponding author
Ohta, Tomoko
Venue
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Published
1987-11
Volume
26
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 0022-2844 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1432
OpenAlex
W1965032858
Cited by
101
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
slightly deleterious mutations, molecular clock, selection coefficients, amino acid substitutions, population size, evolutionary rates, generation time, mutation rate, molecular evolution
MeSH terms
Amino Acids, DNA, Biological Evolution, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Proteins, Selection, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review