Cited by 25Psychometric Methodologies and TestingEmployer Branding and e-HRMHuman Resource Development and Performance Evaluation

Potential sources of criterion bias in supervisor ratings used for test validation

Lefkowitz, Joel, Battista, Mariangela·1995·Journal of Business and Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02230978

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lefkowitz, J., & Battista, M.
Affiliations
Baruch College (US)
Venue
Journal of Business and Psychology
Published
1995-06
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
389-414
ISSN
  • 0889-3268 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-353X
OpenAlex
W2057801357
Cited by
25
References
70
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Business and Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
Keywords
supervisor ratings, performance evaluation (human resources), criterion validity, test validation, ethnic similarity, sex bias

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review