The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regression Among Factor Scores
Abstract
Structural equation models with latent variables are sometimes estimated using an intuitive three-step approach, here denoted factor score regression. Consider a structural equation model composed of an explanatory latent variable and a response latent variable related by a structural parameter of scientific interest. In this simple example estimation of the structural parameter proceeds as follows: First, common factor models are separately estimated for each latent variable. Second, factor scores are separately assigned to each latent variable, based on the estimates. Third, ordinary linear regression analysis is performed among the factor scores producing an estimate for the structural parameter. We investigate the asymptotic and finite sample performance of different factor score regression methods for structural equation models with latent variables. It is demonstrated that the conventional approach to factor score regression performs very badly. Revised factor score regression, using Regression factor scores for the explanatory latent variables and Bartlett scores for the response latent variables, produces consistent estimators for all parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305 · Cited by 3,618
Cited by
Latent Class Modeling with Covariates: Two Improved Three-Step Approaches
Vermunt, J. K. (2010) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpq025 · Cited by 2,343
Tufford (2017) · doi:10.1007/s · Cited by 2,003
Heckman, J., Pinto, R., & Savelyev, P. (2013) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.103.6.2052 · Cited by 1,628
Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: one-step versus three-step estimators
Bolck, A., Croon, M., & Hagenaars, J. (2004) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mph001 · Cited by 1,406
Generalized Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling
Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02295939 · Cited by 831
Self-citationMultiple-Group Analysis of Similarity in Latent Profile Solutions
Morin, A. J. S., Meyer, J. P., Creusier, J., & Biétry, F. (2016) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428115621148 · Cited by 664
Thinking twice about sum scores
McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2020) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01398-0 · Cited by 592
Chakravarty, A., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2013) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0500 · Cited by 502
Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., & Nagengast, B. (2009) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170903333665 · Cited by 481
Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2012) · Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition · doi:10.1002/9781118133880.hop202023 · Cited by 330
Elhai, J. D., & Palmieri, P. A. (2011) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.04.007 · Cited by 257
Stability, change, and implications of students’ motivation profiles: A latent transition analysis
Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., & Reeve, J. (2017) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.006 · Cited by 252
Morin, A. J. S., Boudrias, J.-S., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., Dagenais-Desmarais, V., Madore, I., & Litalien, D. (2017) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-016-9448-7 · Cited by 226
Litalien, D., Morin, A. J. S., Gagné, M., Vallerand, R. J., Losier, G. F., & Ryan, R. M. (2017) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.06.010 · Cited by 163
Litalien, D., Gillet, N., Gagné, M., Ratelle, C. F., & Morin, A. J. S. (2019) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.01.005 · Cited by 83
Flunger, B., Mayer, A., & Umbach, N. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000284 · Cited by 65
On the temporal stability of self-determined work motivation profiles: a latent transition analysis
Fernet, C., Litalien, D., Morin, A. J. S., Austin, S., Gagné, M., Lavoie-Tremblay, M., & Forest, J. (2020) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2019.1688301 · Cited by 61
University students' need satisfaction trajectories: A growth mixture analysis
Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., Huyghebaert, T., Burger, L., Maillot, A., Poulin, A., & Tricard, E. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.11.003 · Cited by 57
Toward an Improved Understanding of Work Motivation Profiles
Tóth‐Király, I., Morin, A. J. S., Bőthe, B., Rigó, A., & Orosz, G. (2021) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12256 · Cited by 54
Chénard-Poirier, L. A., Morin, A. J. S., Boudrias, J.-S., & Gillet, N. (2022) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-021-09734-7 · Cited by 52
A Person‐Centred Perspective on Social Support in the Workplace
Caesens, G., Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., Houle, S. A., & Stinglhamber, F. (2020) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/apps.12196 · Cited by 46
Four Text‐Mining Methods for Measuring Elaboration
Dumas, D., Organisciak, P., Maio, S., & Doherty, M. (2021) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.471 · Cited by 38
A test of work motivation profile similarity across four distinct samples of employees
Gillet, N., Morin, A. J. S., Ndiaye, A., Colombat, P., & Fouquereau, E. (2020) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12322 · Cited by 34
Toward a generalized developmental model of psychopathological liabilities and psychiatric disorders
Blanco, C., Wall, M. M., Hoertel, N., Krueger, R. F., & Olfson, M. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721005468 · Cited by 10
Jeng, A. (2026) · Learning, Culture and Social Interaction · doi:10.1016/j.lcsi.2026.101006
Metadata
- Authors
- Skrondal, A., & Laake, P.
- Venue
- Psychometrika
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 563-575
- ISSN
- 0033-3123 (ISSN-L)
- 1860-0980
- OpenAlex
- W2000301050
- Cited by
- 479
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.