Cited by 157Visual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsData Visualization and Analytics

A Theoretical Analysis of How Segmentation of Dynamic Visualizations Optimizes Students' Learning

Open access
Spanjers, Ingrid A. E., van Gog, Tamara, van Merriënboer, Jeroen J. G.·2010·Educational Psychology Review

Abstract

This article reviews studies investigating segmentation of dynamic visualizations (i.e., showing dynamic visualizations in pieces with pauses in between) and discusses two not mutually exclusive processes that might underlie the effectiveness of segmentation. First, cognitive activities needed for dealing with the transience of dynamic visualizations impose extraneous cognitive load, which may hinder learning. Segmentation may reduce the negative effect of this load by dividing animations into smaller units of information and providing pauses between segments that give students time for the necessary cognitive activities after each of those units of information. Second, event segmentation theory states that people mentally segment dynamic visualizations during perception (i.e., divide the information shown in pieces). Segmentation of dynamic visualisation could cue relevant segments to students, which may aid them in perceiving the structure underlying the process or procedure shown.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10648-010-9135-6

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Spanjers, I. A. E., Wouters, P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animations. Computers in Human Behavior (in press).
  2. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spanjers, I. A. E., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Spanjers, Ingrid A. E.
Venue
Educational Psychology Review
Published
2010-05-13
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
411-423
ISSN
  • 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-336X
OpenAlex
W2153014152
Cited by
157
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
Keywords
dynamic visualization, animation, cognitive load, event segmentation theory, visual perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review