Cited by 94Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsLipid metabolism and disorders

Ability of traditional lipid ratios and apolipoprotein ratios to predict cardiovascular risk in people with type 2 diabetes

Open access
on behalf of the FIELD study investigators, Taskinen, M.-R., Barter, P. J., Ehnholm, C., Sullivan, D. R., Mann, K., Simes, J., Best, J. D. +2 more·2010·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis The apolipoprotein B (ApoB):apolipoprotein A (ApoA)-I ratio may be a better indicator of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in people with type 2 diabetes than traditional lipid risk markers (LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triacylglycerol), but whether the ApoB:ApoA-I ratio should be used to indicate lipid-lowering therapy is still debated.Methods The Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study randomised 9,795 patients with type 2 diabetes to fenofibrate (200 mg daily) or placebo and followed them up for a median of 5 years. We compared ApoB, ApoA-I, ApoAII and the ApoB:ApoA-I ratio with traditional lipid variables as predictors of CVD risk. We estimated the HR of the effect of 1 SD difference in baseline concentrations of lipids, apolipoproteins and respective ratios on the risk of CVD events and also used receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.Results In the placebo group, the variables best predicting CVD events were non-HDL-cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol (HR 1.21, p < 0.001 for both), ApoB:ApoA-I (HR 1.20, p < 0.001), LDL-cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol (HR 1.17, p < 0.001), HDL-cholesterol (HR 0.84, p < 0.001) and ApoA-I (HR 0.85, p < 0.001). In the fenofibrate group, the first four predictors were very similar (but ApoB:ApoA-I was fourth), followed by non-HDL-cholesterol and ApoB. Lipid ratios and ApoB:ApoA-I performed better than any single lipid or apolipoprotein in predicting CVD risk.Conclusions/interpretation In patients with type 2 diabetes in the FIELD study, traditional lipid ratios were as strong as the ApoB:ApoA-I ratio in predicting CVD risk. The data provide little evidence for replacement of traditional lipids and their ratios with measures of ApoB, ApoA-I and their ratio.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-010-1806-9

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In people with diabetes in the FIELD study, apolipoprotein B gave no benefit beyond traditional lipid markers.

    “apo B provided no benefit beyond traditional lipid markers in people with diabetes in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study.47”

    From ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias (2011) · cites this paper as [47]

  • In type 2 diabetes patients in the FIELD study, traditional lipid ratios (non-HDL-C/HDL-C and TC/HDL-C) predicted CVD risk as strongly as the apo B/apo A1 ratio and captured the impact of both atherogenic and antiatherogenic particles.

    “Recent data from patients with type 2 diabetes in the FIELD study revealed that traditional lipid ratios (non-HDL-C/HDL-C, TC/ HDL-C) were as strong predictors for CVD risk as the apo B/apo A1 ratio, and captured the impact of both atherogenic and antiatherogenic particles on CVD risk.47”

    From ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias (2011) · cites this paper as [47]

  • In people with diabetes in the FIELD study, apolipoprotein B provided no benefit beyond traditional lipid markers.

    “Likewise, apoB provided no benefit beyond traditional lipid markers in people with diabetes in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study. 102”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [102]

  • In the FIELD study, apoB provided no benefit beyond traditional lipid markers in people with diabetes.

    “Likewise, apoB provided no benefit beyond traditional lipid markers in people with diabetes in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study.102”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [102]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
on behalf of the FIELD study investigators, Taskinen, M.-R., Barter, P. J., Ehnholm, C., Sullivan, D. R., Mann, K., Simes, J., Best, J. D., Hamwood, S., & Keech, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Taskinen, M.-R.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2010-06-06
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
1846-1855
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2111587776
Cited by
94
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
10.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Kowa Company
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
Keywords
apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A-I ratio, lipid ratios, cardiovascular risk prediction, type 2 diabetes, fenofibrate, fieldwork, non-HDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-II, lipid-lowering therapy, cardiovascular events, prognostic value
MeSH terms
Aged, Hypolipidemic Agents, Apolipoproteins, Apolipoproteins B, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Lipids, Cholesterol, HDL, Male, Middle Aged, Fenofibrate, Risk Factors, Triglycerides, Apolipoprotein A-I, Apolipoprotein A-II

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review