Cited by 123Microplastics and Plastic PollutionImmunotoxicology and immune responsesPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

A novel 3D intestine barrier model to study the immune response upon exposure to microplastics

Lehner, Roman, Wohlleben, Wendel, Septiadi, Dedy, Landsiedel, Robert, Petri-Fink, Alke, Rothen-Rutishauser, Barbara·2020·Archives of Toxicology

Abstract

The plausibility of human exposure to microplastics has increased within the last years. Microplastics have been found in different food types including seafood, salt, sugar and beverages. So far, human health effects of microplastics after ingestion are unknown. Herein, we designed a novel, three-dimensional in vitro intestinal model consisting of the human intestinal epithelial cell lines Caco-2 and HT29-MTX-E12 as well as human blood monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells that is suitable to assess the possible effects of ingested microplastics. Relevant microplastic particles (in the order of 50-500 µm), including polymers representing tire wear and polyolefins, which represent major sources of microplastic in the EU, were compared to other polymer classes and an inorganic microparticle, healing earth, which is intended for human consumption. Microplastic particles were exposed at concentrations of 823.5-1380.0 µg/cm 2 to the model using a dry powder insufflator system to aerosolize the particles directly on the intestinal model's surface. Cytotoxicity was investigated after 6, 24 and 48 h of exposure via measuring the release of lactate dehydrogenase. Inflammatory end points including the cytokines IL-8, TNFα and IL-1β as well as changes of the barrier integrity after exposure were additionally monitored. We demonstrated that all of the microplastics and the healing earth particles did not cause any significant cytotoxicity or release of (pro-)inflammatory cytokines and did not change the barrier integrity of the co-culture at any of the time points investigated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00204-020-02750-1

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehner, R., Wohlleben, W., Septiadi, D., Landsiedel, R., Petri-Fink, A., & Rothen-Rutishauser, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Fribourg (CH)
  • BASF (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Lehner, Roman
Venue
Archives of Toxicology
Published
2020-04-19
Volume
94
Issue
7
Pages
2463-2479
ISSN
  • 0340-5761 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0738
OpenAlex
W3016771629
Cited by
123
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Adolphe Merkle Foundation
  • BASF
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
microplastics, intestinal barrier, Caco-2 cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, cytotoxicity, inflammatory cytokines, barrier integrity, polyolefins, tire wear particles, aerosols
MeSH terms
Microplastics, Aerosols, Cell Survival, Dendritic Cells, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Macrophages, Particle Size, Permeability, Time Factors, Cytokines, Electric Impedance, Risk Assessment, Inflammation Mediators, Coculture Techniques, Caco-2 Cells, HT29 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review