Cited by 195Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychedelics and Drug Studies

Neural Basis of Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol: Effects During Response Inhibition

Borgwardt, Stefan J., Allen, Paul, Bhattacharyya, Sagnik, Fusar-Poli, Paolo, Crippa, Jose A., Seal, Marc L., Fraccaro, Valter, Atakan, Zerrin +4 more·2008·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background This study examined the effect of Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) on brain activation during a motor inhibition task. Methods Functional magnetic resonance imaging and behavioural measures were recorded while 15 healthy volunteers performed a Go/No-Go task following administration of either THC or CBD or placebo in a double-blind, pseudo-randomized, placebo-controlled repeated measures within-subject design. Results Relative to placebo, THC attenuated activation in the right inferior frontal and the anterior cingulate gyrus. In contrast, CBD deactivated the left temporal cortex and insula. These effects were not related to changes in anxiety, intoxication, sedation, and psychotic symptoms. Conclusions These data suggest that THC attenuates the engagement of brain regions that mediate response inhibition. CBD modulated function in regions not usually implicated in response inhibition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.05.011

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borgwardt, S. J., Allen, P., Bhattacharyya, S., Fusar-Poli, P., Crippa, J. A., Seal, M. L., Fraccaro, V., Atakan, Z., Martin-Santos, R., O'Carroll, C., Rubia, K., & McGuire, P. K.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Borgwardt, Stefan J.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
64
Issue
11
Pages
966-973
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017062859
Cited by
195
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 20
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
Keywords
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, cannabidiol, response inhibition, go/no-go task, brain activation, inferior frontal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, temporal cortex, insula
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cannabidiol, Decision Making, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Inhibition, Psychological, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Photic Stimulation, Psychotropic Drugs, Reaction Time, Dronabinol, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review