Cited by 132Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Probing emotional influences on cognitive control: an ALE meta-analysis of cognition emotion interactions

Open access
Cromheeke, Sofie, Mueller, Sven C.·2014·Brain Structure and Function

Abstract

Increasing research documents an integration of cognitive control and affective processes. Despite a surge of interest in investigating the exact nature of this integration, no consensus has been reached on the precise neuroanatomical network involved. Using the activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis method, we examined 43 functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies (total number of foci = 332; total number of participants, N = 820) from the literature that have reported significant interactions between emotion and cognitive control. Meta-analytic results revealed that concurrent emotion (relative to emotionally neutral trials) consistently increased neural activation during high relative to low cognitive control conditions across studies and paradigms. Specifically, these activations emerged in regions commonly implicated in cognitive control, such as the lateral prefrontal cortex (inferior frontal junction, inferior frontal gyrus), the medial prefrontal cortex, and the basal ganglia. In addition, some areas emerged during the interaction contrast that were not present during one of the main effects and included the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex and the precuneus. These data provide new evidence for a network of cognition emotion interaction within a cognitive control setting. The findings are discussed within current theories of cognitive and attentional control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00429-013-0549-z

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hot cognitive control shows some dissociations from cool cognitive control.

    “Many PFC areas are particularly associated with control over emotionally relevant information (hot CC) [60–64, 66], which, as discussed earlier, show some dissociations from cool CC.”
  • Many prefrontal cortex areas are particularly associated with control over emotionally relevant information (hot cognitive control).

    “Many PFC areas are particularly associated with control over emotionally relevant information (hot CC) [60–64, 66], which, as discussed earlier, show some dissociations from cool CC.”
  • A recent meta-analysis of interactions between emotional stimuli and cognitive control in adults highlighted involvement of ACC, inferior frontal junction, dlPFC and posterior medial OFC.

    “A recent meta-analysis of interactions between emotional stimuli and cognitive control in adults highlighted the involvement of ACC, inferior frontal junction, dlPFC and posterior medial OFC (Cromheeke and Mueller, 2014).”

    From Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence (2015) · cites this paper as Cromheeke and Mueller, 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [18]18. Dolcos, F. and G. McCarthy (2006). "Brain systems mediating cognitive interference by emotional distraction." J Neurosci 26(7): 2072-2079.
  2. [26]26. Gray, J. R., T. S. Braver and M. E. Raichle (2002). "Integration of emotion and cognition in the lateral prefrontal cortex." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99(6): 4115-4120.
  3. [47]47. Shackman, A. J., T. V. Salomons, H. A. Slagter, A. S. Fox, J. J. Winter and R. J. Davidson (2011). "The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex." Nature reviews. Neuroscience 12(3): 154-167.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cromheeke, S., & Mueller, S. C.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Mueller, Sven C.
Venue
Brain Structure and Function
Published
2013-04-07
Volume
219
Issue
3
Pages
995-1008
ISSN
  • 1863-2653 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-2661
OpenAlex
W2047560111
Cited by
132
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Structure and Function (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Universiteit Gent
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
cognitive control, emotions, emotion and cognition, artificial neural networks, lateral prefrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, basal ganglia, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, attentional control, activation likelihood estimation
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Emotions, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Likelihood Functions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review