Cited by 437Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control.

BRASS, M, DERRFUSS, J, FORSTMANN, B, CRAMON, D·2005·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Cognitive control processes refer to our ability to coordinate thoughts and actions in accordance with internal goals. In the fronto-lateral cortex such processes have been primarily related to mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (mid-DLPFC). However, recent brain-imaging and meta-analytic studies suggest that a region located more posterior in the fronto-lateral cortex plays a pivotal role in cognitive control as well. This region has been termed the inferior frontal junction area and can be functionally and structurally distinguished from mid-DLPFC.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.001

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Work by Marcel Brass and colleagues has offered a suggestion about how two apparently independent systems, both of which process representations of both self and other, may interact to create an experience of not-me and therefore me.

    “Recently the work of Marcel Brass and colleagues has offered a suggestion about how these two apparently independent systems, both of which process representations of both self and other, may interact to create an experience of not-me and therefore me”

    From A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder (2009) · cites this paper as Brass, Derrfuss, Forstmann, & von Cramon, 2005

  • Neuroimaging studies indicate that the neural regions most often recruited in the inhibition of imitative behavior are the anterior frontomedial cortex and the temporoparietal junction area, which are cortical areas also related to mentalizing, self-referential processing, and self-agency.

    “Neuroimaging studies indicate that the neural regions that are most often recruited in the inhibition of imitative behavior are the anterior frontomedial cortex (aFMC) and the temporoparietal junction (TPJ) area (Brass et al., 2005), which are cortical areas that are also related to mentalizing, self-referential processing, and self-agency.”
  • The inhibition of imitative behavior involves cortical areas that are also related to mentalizing, self-referential processing, and determining self-agency.

    “Thus, it appears that the inhibition of imitative behavior involves cortical areas that are also related to mentalizing, selfreferential processing, and determining selfagency.”
  • In contrast to earlier observations, here we identified two new areas instead of one, which had been hypothesized on the basis of functional imaging experiments.

    “In contrast to earlier observations, however, here we identified two new areas instead of one, which had been hypothesized on the basis of functional imaging experiments, for example during task switching [56],[58].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BRASS, M., DERRFUSS, J., FORSTMANN, B., & CRAMON, D.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
BRASS, M
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-07
Volume
9
Issue
7
Pages
314-316
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062329200
Cited by
437
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 32
FWCI
11.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
inferior frontal junction, cognitive control, executive function, goal-directed behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Humans, Functional Laterality, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review