Cited by 61Digital Mental Health InterventionsChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and care

Acceptability and feasibility of an e-mental health intervention for parents of childhood cancer survivors:“Cascade”

Wakefield, Claire E., Sansom-Daly, Ursula M., McGill, Brittany C., Ellis, Sarah J., Doolan, Emma L., Robertson, Eden G., Mathur, Sanaa, Cohn, Richard J.·2016·Supportive Care in Cancer

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of "Cascade": an online, group-based, cognitive behavioral therapy intervention, delivered "live" by a psychologist, to assist parents of children who have completed cancer treatment.Methods Forty-seven parents were randomized to Cascade (n = 25) or a 6-month waitlist (n = 22). Parents completed questionnaires at baseline, 1-2 weeks and 6 months post-intervention. Thirty parents completed full evaluations of the Cascade program (n = 21 randomized to Cascade, n = 9 completed Cascade post-waitlist).Results Ninety-six percent of Cascade participants completed the intervention (n = 24/25). Eighty percent of parents completed every questionnaire (mean completion time 25 min (SD = 12)). Cascade was described as at least "somewhat" helpful by all parents. None rated Cascade as "very/quite" burdensome. Parents reported that the "online format was easy to use" (n = 28, 93.3 %), "I learnt new skills" (n = 28, 93.3 %), and "I enjoyed talking to others" (n = 29, 96.7 %). Peer-to-peer benefits were highlighted by good group cohesion scores.Conclusions Cascade is highly acceptable and feasible. Its online delivery mechanism may address inequities in post-treatment support for parents, a particularly acute concern for rural/remote families. Future research needs to establish the efficacy of the intervention.Trial registration ACTRN12613000270718, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?ACTRN=12613000270718.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00520-016-3077-6

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wakefield, C. E., Sansom-Daly, U. M., McGill, B. C., Ellis, S. J., Doolan, E. L., Robertson, E. G., Mathur, S., & Cohn, R. J.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Wakefield, Claire E.
Venue
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2016-01-19
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
2685-2694
ISSN
  • 0941-4355 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-7339
OpenAlex
W2293616046
Cited by
61
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
8.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Supportive Care in Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Australia (AU) (APP1065428)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (AU) (APP1067501)
  • Cancer Institute of New South Wales (11/ECF/3-43)
  • Cancer Institute NSW (AU) (11/ECF/3-43, 14/ECF/1-11)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
childhood cancer survivors, parents of cancer survivors, digital mental health interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, online group intervention, treatment acceptability, intervention feasibility, peer support, post-treatment support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Parents, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Telemedicine, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review