CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 85

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of a virtual butterfly ecological system based on augmented reality and mobile learning technologies

Tarng, Wernhuar, Ou, Kuo-Liang, Yu, Chuan-Sheng, Liou, Fong-Lu, Liou, Hsin-Hun·2015·Virtual Reality
DOI 10.1007/s10055-015-0265-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10055-015-0265-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Azuma RT (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Teleop Virtual Environ 6(4):355–385 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Billinghurst M, Kato H, Poupyrev I (2001) The magicbook-moving seamlessly between reality and virtuality. Comput Gr Appl 21(3):2–4
  3. Campbell T, Wang SK, Hsu H-Y, Duffy AM, Wolf PG (2010) Learning with web tools, simulations, and other technologies in science classrooms. J Sci Educ Technol 19(5):505–511 · DOI
  4. Chen WS (1988) Butterflies of Taiwan. Taiwan Provincial Museum, Taipei
  5. Chen YS, Kao TC, Sheu JP (2003) A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning. J Comput Assist Learn 19(3):347–359 · DOI
  6. Chen YS, Kao TC, Sheu JP (2004) A mobile butterfly-watching learning system for supporting independent learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE workshop on wireless and mobile technologies in education, Taiwan, pp 11–18 · DOI
  7. Chen Y-C, Chi H-L, Hung W-H, Kang S-C (2011) Use of tangible and augmented reality models in engineering graphics courses. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract 137(4):267–276 · DOI
  8. Dede C (2009) Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science 323(5910):66–69 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dunleavy M, Dede C, Mitchell R (2009) Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. J Sci Educ Technol 18(1):7–22 · DOI
  10. Hsu TY, Chen CM (2010) A mobile learning module for high school fieldwork. J Geogr 109(4):141–149 · DOI
  11. Johnson LF, Levine A, Smith RS, Haywood K (2010) Key emerging technologies for elementary and secondary education. Educ Dig 76(1):36–40
  12. Klopfer E, Sheldon J (2010) Augmenting your own reality: student authoring of science-based augmented reality games. New Dir Youth Dev 128:85–94 · DOI
  13. Lee CY, Wang SY (1986) The observation and breeding of butterflies. Taiwan Provincial Museum, Taipei
  14. Likert R (1932) A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 22(40):1–55
  15. Lin Y-S (2008) Development and effectiveness analysis of a ubiquitous collaborative learning system—a case study on the butterfly and ecology course of an elementary school. In: Master Thesis, National University of Tainan, Department of Information and Learning Technology, Tainan
  16. Liu TC, Wang HY, Liang JK, Chan TW, Ko HW, Yang JC (2003) Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. J Comput Assist Learn 19(3):371–382 · DOI
  17. Martin S, Diaz G, Sancristobal E, Gil R, Castro M, Peire J (2011) New technology trends in education: seven years of forecasts and convergence. Comput Educ 57(3):1893–1906 · DOI
  18. Ministry of Education (2006) General guidelines of grades 1–9 science and life technology curriculum. Ministry of Education, Taipei
  19. Mistler-Jackson M, Songer B (2000) Student motivation and Internet technology: are students empowered to learn science? J Res Sci Teach 37:459–479 · DOI
  20. Schilit WN (1995) A system architecture for context-aware mobile computing. In: Unpublished doctoral thesis, Columbia University · DOI
  21. Schiller J, Voisard A (2004) Location-based services. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
  22. Shih JL, Hwang GJ, Chu YC (2010) The development and instructional application of u-library on butterfly and wetland ecology for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Int J Mob Learn Organ 4(3):253–268 · DOI
  23. Wu H-K, Lee SW-Y, Chang H-Y, Liang J-C (2013) Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Comput Educ 62:41–49 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 85

Metadata

Authors
Tarng, W., Ou, K.-L., Yu, C.-S., Liou, F.-L., & Liou, H.-H.
Venue
Virtual Reality
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2015-05-21
Volume
19
Issue
3-4
Pages
253-266
ISSN
  • 1359-4338
  • 1434-9957
DOI
10.1007/s10055-015-0265-5
Cited by
85
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review