Cited by 74Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Outcomes of adolescent-onset postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome

Bhatia, Roma, Kizilbash, Sarah J., Ahrens, Shelley P., Killian, Jill M., Kimmes, Stephanie A., Knoebel, Erin E., Muppa, Prasuna, Weaver, Amy L. +1 more·2016·The Journal of Pediatrics

Abstract

Objectives To determine the clinical course of adolescent-onset postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and to assess health-related quality of life, 2-10 years after diagnosis.Study design Pediatric patients, 13-18 years of age, diagnosed with POTS at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, from 2003 to 2010 were mailed a questionnaire if they were at least 18 years of age at the time of the mailing. The primary outcome measures were norm-based, age- and sex-adjusted, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey physical composite score and mental composite score.Results The survey was mailed to 502 patients with a response rate of 34% (n = 172). The mean duration from diagnosis to survey completion was 5.4 (SD, 1.9) years; the mean age of the respondents at the time of the survey was 21.8 (2.2) years. The responders were predominantly females (84% vs 68% of nonresponders; P < .001). Only 33 (19%) respondents reported complete resolution of symptoms, and an additional 51% reported persistent but improved symptoms, and 28 (16%) had only intermittent symptoms. The majority (71%) consider their health at least "good." The mean physical composite score was significantly lower than the population norm (mean [SD], 36.6 [15.8] vs 50; P < .001), however, the corresponding mean mental composite score was normal (50.1 [11.2]).Conclusions Overall, 86% of adolescents with POTS report resolved, improved, or just intermittent symptoms, when assessed via questionnaire at an average of 5 years after initial treatment. Patients with persistent symptoms have more physical than mental health concerns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.02.035

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhatia, R., Kizilbash, S. J., Ahrens, S. P., Killian, J. M., Kimmes, S. A., Knoebel, E. E., Muppa, P., Weaver, A. L., & Fischer, P. R.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Philip R.
Venue
The Journal of Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
173
Pages
149-153
ISSN
0022-3476 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2294318906
Cited by
74
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, long-term outcomes, health-related quality of life, physical function, mental health, symptom resolution, pediatric patients
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Recurrence, Remission, Spontaneous, Severity of Illness Index, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review