Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 186

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness?

Su, Yu-Shan, Tsang, Eric W. K., Peng, Mike W.·2009·Asia Pacific Journal of Management
DOI 10.1007/s10490-008-9114-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10490-008-9114-3

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Adner, R., & Levinthal, D. 2001. Demand heterogeneity and technology evolution: Implications for product and process innovation. Management Science, 47(5): 611–628. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regressions: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
  3. Atuahene-Gima, K., & Evangelista, F. 2000. Cross-functional influence in new product development: An exploratory study of marketing and R&D perspectives. Management Science, 46(10): 1269–1284. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bartholomew, S. 1997. National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2): 241–266. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baum, J. A. C., & Silverman, B. S. 2004. Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology startups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3): 411–436. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. 2000. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and start-ups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 267–294. · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::aid-smj89>3.0.co;2-8
  7. Chesbrough, H. 2003. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  8. Christensen, C. M., & Bower, J. L. 1996. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(3): 197–218. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cockburn, I., & Henderson, R. 1998. Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2): 157–182. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128–152. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. 2001. The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1): 45–65. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Danneels, E. 2002. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12): 1095–1121. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Day, G. S. 1994. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4): 37–51. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dougherty, D. 1992. A practice-centered model of organizational renewal through product innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 13(Summer Special Issue): 77–92. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. 2005. Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3): 277–285. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. 2003. The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and improving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14(1): 57–68. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Dyer, J. H., & Hatch, N. W. 2006. Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8): 710–719.
  18. Ettlie, J. E., & Reza, E. M. 1992. Organizational integration and process innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 35(4): 795–827. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ettlie, J. E., Bridges, W. P., & O’Keefe, R. D. 1984. Organization strategy and structural differences for radical versus incremental innovation. Management Science, 30(6): 682–695. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Fiol, C. M. 1996. Squeezing harder doesn’t always work: Continuing the search for consistency in innovation research. Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1012–1021. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Frost and Sullivan Consulting 2005. Competitive benchmarking of Taiwan biotechnology industry. Palo Alto: Frost and Sullivan Consulting.
  22. Galoghirou, Y., Kastelli, I., & Tsakanikas, A. 2004. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: Complements or substitute for innovative performance. Technovation, 24(1): 29–39. · DOI · Paper page
  23. George, G., Zahra, S. A., & Wood, D. R. 2002. The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6): 577–609. · DOI · Paper page
  24. Gopalakrishnan, S., & Damanpour, F. 1997. A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management. Omega, 25(1): 15–28. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gopalakrishnan, S., Bierly, P., & Kessler, E. H. 1999. A reexamination of product and process innovations using a knowledge-based view. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 10(1): 147–166. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Grant, R. M. 2002. Contemporary strategy analysis (4th ed.). New York: Blackwell.
  27. Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. 2006. The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 693–706. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Helfat, C. E. 1994. Firm-specificity in corporate applied R&D. Organization Science, 5(2): 173–184. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. 1994. Measuring competence: Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Winter Special Issue): 63–84. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. 2005. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 146–165. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Junkunc, M. T. 2007. Managing radical innovation: The importance of specialized knowledge in the biotech revolution. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3): 388–411. · DOI
  32. Kale, P., & Singh, H. 2007. Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10): 981–1000. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. 2000. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 217–237. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. 2002. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(8): 1183–1194. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. 1992. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3): 502–518. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Koza, M. P., & Lewin, A. Y. 1998. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science, 9(3): 255–264. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Koza, M. P., & Lewin, A. Y. 2000. Managing partnerships and strategic alliances: Raising the odds of success. European Management Journal, 16(2): 146–151. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Lane, P. J., & Lubatkin, M. 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, 19(5): 461–477. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. 2006. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4): 797–818. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(Winter Special Issue): 95–112. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Lee, C., Lee, K., & Pennings, J. M. 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7): 615–640. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Lim, L. P. L., Garnsey, E., & Gregory, M. 2006. Product and process innovation in biopharmaceuticals: A new perspective on development. R&D Management, 36(1): 27–36. · DOI
  43. Lu, Y., Tsang, E. W. K., & Peng, M. W. 2008. Knowledge management and innovation strategy in the Asia Pacific: toward an institution-based view. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25(3): 361–374. · DOI · Paper page
  44. McMillan, G. S., Narin, F., & Deeds, D. L. 2000. An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1): 1–8. · DOI · Paper page
  45. Meyer, K. E. 2007. Asian contexts and the search for general theory in management research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25: 527–534. · DOI
  46. Millson, M. R., Raj, S. P., & Wilemon, D. 1996. Strategic partnering for developing new products. Research Technology Management, 39(3): 41–49. · DOI
  47. O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. L. 2004. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Business Review, 82(4): 74–81.
  48. Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. 2004. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organization Science, 15(1): 5–12. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., & Powell, W. W. 2002. A comparison of U.S. and European university–industry relations in the life science. Management Science, 48(1): 24–43. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Park, S. H., Chen, R., & Gallagher, S. 2002. Firm resources as moderators of the relationship between market growth and strategic alliances in semiconductor start-ups. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3): 527–545. · DOI · Paper page
  51. Peng, M. W. 2001. The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management, 27(6): 803–829. · doi:10.1177/014920630102700611 · Paper page
  52. Phene, A., Fladmoe-Lindquist, K., & Marsh, L. 2006. Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: The effects of technology space and geographic origin. Strategic Management Journal, 27(4): 369–388. · DOI · Paper page
  53. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4): 531–544. · DOI · Paper page
  54. Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. 2006. Investigating the sources of process innovation among U.K. manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(4): 653–682. · DOI · Paper page
  55. Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free.
  56. Rosenkopf, L., & Nerkar, A. 2006. Beyond local search: Boundary scanning, exploration, and the impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22(4): 287–306. · DOI · Paper page
  57. Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. 2004. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3): 201–221. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Rothermael, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. 2006. Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4): 429–460. · DOI · Paper page
  59. Rouvinen, P. 2002. Characteristics of product and process innovators: Some evidence from the Finnish innovation survey. Applied Economics Letters, 9(9): 575–580. · DOI
  60. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  61. Stieglitz, N., & Heine, K. 2007. Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 28(1): 1–15. · DOI · Paper page
  62. Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. 1999. Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2): 315–349. · DOI · Paper page
  63. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleisoher, M. 1990. The process of technological innovation. Lexington: Lexington Books.
  64. Tushman, M. L., Anderson, P. C., & O’Reilly, C. 1997. Technology cycles, innovation streams, and ambidextrous organizations. In M. L. Tushman & P. Anderson (Eds.). Managing strategic innovation and change: 3–23. New York: Oxford University Press.
  65. Utterback, J. M. 1994. Mastering the dynamics of innovation. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  66. Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. 1975. A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega, 3(6): 639–656. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Van de Ven, A. H. 1986. Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5): 590–607. · DOI · Paper page
  68. von Hippel, E. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  69. Walker, G., Kogut, B., & Shan, W. J. 1997. Social capital, structure holes, and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science, 8(2): 109–125. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Weiss, P. 2003. Adoption of product and process innovations in differentiated markets: The impact of competition. Review of Industrial Organization, 23(3–4): 301–314. · doi:10.1023/b:reio.0000031372.79077.fc
  71. Winter, S. G. 1984. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5(3–4): 287–320. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. 2005. Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9): 809–825. · DOI · Paper page
  73. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. 1998. Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88(1): 290–306.

Cited by

See all 186

Metadata

Authors
Su, Y.-S., Tsang, E. W. K., & Peng, M. W.
Venue
Asia Pacific Journal of Management
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-09-24
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
309-331
ISSN
  • 0217-4561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9958
DOI
10.1007/s10490-008-9114-3
OpenAlex
W1979805889
Cited by
186
References
11
FWCI
29.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s10490-008-9114-3
The paper
Su, Y.-S., Tsang, E. W. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). How do internal capabilities and external partnerships affect innovativeness? Asia Pacific Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9114-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.