Cited by 419Neural dynamics and brain functionEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Separating Fractal and Oscillatory Components in the Power Spectrum of Neurophysiological Signal

Open access
Wen, Haiguang, Liu, Zhongming·2016·Brain Topography

Abstract

Neurophysiological field-potential signals consist of both arrhythmic and rhythmic patterns indicative of the fractal and oscillatory dynamics arising from likely distinct mechanisms. Here, we present a new method, namely the irregular-resampling auto-spectral analysis (IRASA), to separate fractal and oscillatory components in the power spectrum of neurophysiological signal according to their distinct temporal and spectral characteristics. In this method, we irregularly resampled the neural signal by a set of non-integer factors, and statistically summarized the auto-power spectra of the resampled signals to separate the fractal component from the oscillatory component in the frequency domain. We tested this method on simulated data and demonstrated that IRASA could robustly separate the fractal component from the oscillatory component. In addition, applications of IRASA to macaque electrocorticography and human magnetoencephalography data revealed a greater power-law exponent of fractal dynamics during sleep compared to wakefulness. The temporal fluctuation in the broadband power of the fractal component revealed characteristic dynamics within and across the eyes-closed, eyes-open and sleep states. These results demonstrate the efficacy and potential applications of this method in analyzing electrophysiological signatures of large-scale neural circuit activity. We expect that the proposed method or its future variations would potentially allow for more specific characterization of the differential contributions of oscillatory and fractal dynamics to distributed neural processes underlying various brain functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10548-015-0448-0

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Without sensory input, spontaneous BOLD fluctuations still correlate with underlying synaptic activity measured by LFP, ECoG, and EEG.

    “In the absence of any sensory input, spontaneous BOLD fluctuations are still correlated with underlying synaptic activity observed with LFP (136, 137), ECoG (138), and EEG (139, 140).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wen, H., & Liu, Z.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Zhongming
Venue
Brain Topography
Published
2015-08-29
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
13-26
ISSN
  • 0896-0267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6792
OpenAlex
W1563625862
Cited by
419
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Topography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH104402)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
fractal dynamics, neural oscillations, flow index, electrocorticography, magnetoencephalography, field potentials
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Biological Clocks, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Models, Neurological, Spectrum Analysis, Fractals, Brain Waves, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review