Cited by 17Social Work Education and PracticeStress and Burnout ResearchReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

The Clinically Modified Buddhist Psychological Model for Social Work Practice and Self-care

Open access
Maddock, Alan·2023·Clinical Social Work Journal

Abstract

It is clear from the international social work literature that social workers experience high levels of stress and burnout due to the cognitive, emotional and physical demands of the profession. There are however no integrative theories, developed by social workers, on how this stress, burnout and its impact on the emotional and psychological well-being of social workers can be ameliorated and then improved. This article makes an original contribution to this literature by proposing the use of the clinically modified Buddhist psychological model, as a beneficial lens for understanding how to improve reflective practice in social work along with the feelings of stress, burnout, anxiety, low mood and well-being deficits that can result from social work practice. This paper will outline the rationale for the development of the clinically modified Buddhist psychological model, before outlining the theory itself and how it might support stress coping processes and reflective social work practice. This paper has significance for all social workers, social work students and social work educators, as it provides a theory which could help to inform improved reflective social work practice and self-care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10615-022-00849-9

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both groups experienced within groups changes from pre to post programme, with MBSWSC again outperforming the control group on both potential mediators of change.

    “However, both groups experienced within groups changes from pre to post programme, with MBSWSC again outperforming the control group on both potential mediators of change (Maddock, 2022).”

    From A randomised trial of Mindfulness-based Social Work and Self-Care with social workers (2023) · cites this paper as Maddock, 2022

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that MBSWSC significantly improved the CBPM domains in social work students. It does not report pre-to-post changes in both groups or show that MBSWSC outperformed a control group on two potential mediators. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The CBPM outlines how increases in each of the six domains, and in tendencies towards the use of approach-oriented stress coping strategies, leads to social workers experiencing reduced negative thinking (e.g., worry and rumination) and improvements in stress, burnout, anxiety, depression, and well-being.

    “The CBPM outlines how increases in each of these domains, and in tendencies towards the use of approach-oriented stress coping strategies, leads to social workers experiencing reduced negative thinking (e.g., worry and rumination) and improvements in stress, burnout, anxiety, depression, and well-being (Maddock, 2022).”
  • The CBPM focuses on the effects that six mindfulness mechanisms of action (mindfulness, acceptance, attention regulation (decentering), self-compassion, non-attachment, and non-aversion) could have on mental health and well-being outcomes for social workers.

    “This theory differs from other models of mindfulness, by focussing on the effects that six mindfulness mechanisms of action (CBPM domains); mindfulness, acceptance, attention regulation (decentering), self-compassion, non-attachment, and non-aversion, could have on these important mental health and well-being outcomes for social workers (Maddock, 2022).”
  • The development of each of the six CBPM domains can operate individually or collectively to support social workers to move away from maladaptive avoidant stress coping strategies and instead use more adaptive approach-oriented stress coping strategies.

    “The development of each of these six domains (which are developed in MBSWSC through mindfulness, psychoeducation and reflective practice activities) can operate individually, or collectively, to support social workers to move away from the use maladaptive avoidant stress coping strategies (e.g., denial), and to instead use more adaptive approach-oriented stress coping stress strategies (e.g., ref”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Coping and Adaptation. In W. D. Gentry (Ed.), The Handbook of Behavioral Medicine (pp. 282-325).
  2. Arch, J., & Landy, L. (2015). Mindfulness and emotional benefits. In K. W. Brown, J. D. Creswell, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Mindfulness: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 208-224).
  3. Brown, K. W. (2015). Mindfulness training to enhance positive func- tioning. In K. W. Brown, J. D. Creswell, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Mindfulness: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 311-325). Guilford Press
  4. Salkovskis, P. M. (1996). The cognitive approach to anxiety: threat beliefs, safety-seeking behaviour, and the special case of health anxiety and obsessions. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of Cognitive Therapy (pp. 48-74).
  5. Segal, Z. V., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulness- Based Cognitive Therapy for Depression. Guilford Press
  6. Tang, Y. Y., & Posner, M. I. (2015). Mindfulness in the Context of the Attention System. In K. W. Brown, J. D. Creswell, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Mindfulness: Theory, Research, and Prac- tice (pp. 81-89). Guilford Press
  7. Wethington, E., Glanz, K., & Schwartz, M. D. (2015). Stress, coping, and health behaviour. In K. Glanz, & B. K. Rimer,Viswanath K. (Eds.) (Eds.), Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to juris- dictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
  8. Lynch, T. R., Lazarus, S. A., & Cheavens, J. S. (2015). Mindfulness interventions for emotion dysregulation disorders: From self- control to self-regulation. In K. W. Brown, J. D. Creswell, & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook on Mindfulness: Theory and Research (pp. 329-347).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maddock, A.
Affiliations
Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Maddock, Alan
Venue
Clinical Social Work Journal
Published
2022-06-24
Volume
51
Issue
1
Pages
54-64
ISSN
  • 0091-1674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3343
OpenAlex
W4283377534
Cited by
17
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Clinical Social Work Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Dublin, Trinity College
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
Buddhist psychology, burnout, self-care, reflective practice, social worker well-being, stress coping, anxiety, depressive mood, integrative theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review