Cited by 118Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMind wandering and attention

An experiential avoidance conceptualization of depressive rumination: Three tests of the model

Open access
Giorgio, Jeannette M., Sanflippo, Jacqueline, Kleiman, Evan, Reilly, Dan, Bender, Rachel E., Wagner, Clara A., Liu, Richard T., Alloy, Lauren B.·2010·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

This study examined an experiential avoidance conceptualization of depressive rumination in 3 ways: 1) associations among questionnaire measures of rumination, experiential avoidance, and fear of emotions; 2) performance on a dichotic listening task that highlights preferences for non-depressive material; and 3) psychophysiological reactivity in an avoidance paradigm modeled after the one used by Borkovec, Lyonfields, Wiser, and Deihl (1993) in their examination of worry. One hundred and thirty-eight undergraduates completed questionnaire measures and participated in a clinical interview to diagnose current and past episodes of depression. Of those, 100 were randomly assigned to a rumination or relaxation induction condition and participated in a dichotic listening task, rumination/relaxation induction, and depression induction. Questionnaire measures confirmed a relationship between rumination status and avoidance; however, no significant effects were found in the dichotic listening task. Psychophysiological measures indicated no difference in physiological response to a depression induction among high ruminators (HR). However, low ruminators (LR) in the relaxation condition exhibited a larger IBI response than LR in the rumination condition. Overall, these results provide partial support for an avoidance conceptualization of depressive rumination. Implications of these findings are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2010.07.004

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empirical associations exist between EA and harmful psychological and behavioral problems such as substance and alcohol misuse, PTSD, depression, and anxiety.

    “Relatedly, the empirical associations between EA and a number of harmful psychological and behavioral problems such as substance and alcohol misuse, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety [6,7,8] support this premise.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beck AT Rush AJ Shaw BF Emery G 1979 Cognitive therapy of depression New York Guilford Press
  2. Nolen-Hoeksema S Papageorgiou C Wells A 2004 The Response Style Theory Depressive Rumination: Nature, Theory and Treatment West Sussex, England Wiley

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giorgio, J. M., Sanflippo, J., Kleiman, E., Reilly, D., Bender, R. E., Wagner, C. A., Liu, R. T., & Alloy, L. B.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Giorgio, Jeannette M.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
1021-1031
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018025632
Cited by
118
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH079369)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
depressive rumination, experiential avoidance, fear of emotions, psychophysiological reactivity, worry, depression
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Avoidance Learning, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Psychological, Perceptual Defense, Reference Values, Repression, Psychology, Thinking, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review