Cited by 288Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentEmotions and Moral BehaviorEarly Childhood Education and Development

Definitional issues in emotion regulation research

Bridges, Lisa J, Denham, Susanne A, Ganiban, Jody M·2004·Child Development

Abstract

Operational definitions of emotion regulation are frequently unclear, as are links between emotion regulation measures and underlying theoretical constructs. This is of concern because measurement decisions can have both intentional and unintentional implications for underlying conceptualizations of emotion regulation. This report examines the implications of some such decisions, including (a) focusing on types versus total amount of emotion regulation, (b) determining distinctiveness of measures of emotion versus emotion regulation strategies, (c) deciding whether and how to examine temporal sequencing of strategy use and emotion, d) using discrete versus global emotion measures, and (e) determining when emotion is being regulated. Finally, the need for better conceptualizations and empirical assessments of adaptive (vs. maladaptive) emotion regulation is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00675.x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These distress tolerance findings fit with a broader literature that suggests parents may play a critical role in shaping the socialization and regulation of emotion in their children.

    “Notably, these distress tolerance findings fit with a broader literature that suggests parents may play a critical role in shaping the socialization and regulation of emotion in their children (Bariola, Hughes, & Gullone, 2012; Bridges, Denham, & Ganiban, 2004; Kopp, 1989; Thompson, 1994; Zeman, Cassano, Perry-Parrish, & Stegall, 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bridges, L. J., Denham, S. A., & Ganiban, J. M.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
Venue
Child Development
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
340-345
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2170133377
Cited by
288
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
emotion regulation, operational definitions, construct validity, emotion regulation strategies, emotion measurement
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Child, Child Development, Psychology, Child, Emotions, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Psychological Theory, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review