The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Not New, but Nearly Forgotten: the Testing Effect Decreases or even Disappears as the Complexity of Learning Materials Increases
Open accessAbstract
The testing effect is a finding from cognitive psychology with relevance for education. It shows that after an initial study period, taking a practice test improves long-term retention compared to not taking a test and—more interestingly—compared to restudying the learning material. Boundary conditions of the effect that have received attention include the test format, retrieval success on the initial test, the retention interval, or the spacing of tests. Another potential boundary condition concerns the complexity of learning materials, that is, the number of interacting information elements a learning task contains. This insight is not new, as research from a century ago already had indicated that the testing effect decreases as the complexity of learning materials increases, but that finding seems to have been nearly forgotten. Studies presented in this special issue suggest that the effect may even disappear when the complexity of learning material is very high. Since many learning tasks in schools are high in element interactivity, a failure to find the effect under these conditions is relevant for education. Therefore, this special issue hopes to put this potential boundary condition back on the radar and provide a starting point for discussion and future research on this topic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the generation effect is reduced in novice learners, as there are no previous schemas to work with (Leahy et al., 2015; van Gog & Sweller, 2015).”
From Does difficulty moderate learning? A comparative analysis of the desirable difficulties framework and cognitive load theory (2025) · cites this paper as van Gog & Sweller, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_446 · Cited by 6,172
Self-citationThe Psychology of Learning and Motivation
(2021) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(21)x0002-3 · Cited by 5,082
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory
Bourne, L. E. (1977) · Cited by 4,328
Acquisition of cognitive skill
Anderson, J. R. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369 · Cited by 3,663
Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x · Cited by 2,867
The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x · Cited by 2,037
Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load
Sweller, J. (2010) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5 · Cited by 2,020
Self-citationThe Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152408 · Cited by 1,791
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
Rowland, C. A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037559 · Cited by 1,066 · cited 2×
“According to a Google Scholar search (December 2014), his work has only been cited in nine other publications.”
Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2009) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210802647009 · Cited by 745
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Eight Ways to Promote Generative Learning
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9348-9 · Cited by 832
Transfer of test- enhanced learning: meta-analytic review and synthesis
Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000151 · Cited by 286
Teaching the science of learning
Weinstein, Y., Madan, C. R., & Sumeracki, M. A. (2018) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-017-0087-y · Cited by 288
Retrieval-Based Learning: A Decade of Progress
Karpicke, J. D. (2017) · Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21055-9 · Cited by 223
The science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice
Carpenter, S. K., Pan, S. C., & Butler, A. C. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00089-1 · Cited by 184
Retrieval practice & Bloom’s taxonomy: Do students need fact knowledge before higher order learning?
Agarwal, P. K. (2018) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000282 · Cited by 206
Kirk-Johnson, A., Galla, B. M., & Fraundorf, S. H. (2019) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101237 · Cited by 175
The Testing Effect Is Alive and Well with Complex Materials
Karpicke, J. D., & Aue, W. R. (2015) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9309-3 · Cited by 142
McLaren, B. M., van Gog, T., Ganoe, C. H., Karabinos, M., & Yaron, D. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.038 · Cited by 117
Ross, B., Chase, A., Robbie, D., Oates, G., & Absalom, Y. (2018) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0113-2 · Cited by 83
Enhancing learning by retrieval: Enriching free recall with elaborative prompting
Endres, T., Carpenter, S. K., Martin, A., & Renkl, A. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.010 · Cited by 98
Relations between the worked example and generation effects on immediate and delayed tests
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.06.007 · Cited by 82
Self-citationEffects of incorporating retrieval into learning tasks: The complexity of the tasks matters
Roelle, J., & Berthold, K. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.008 · Cited by 71
Carpenter, S. K., Endres, T., & Hui, L. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09562-w · Cited by 80
Roelle, J., & Nückles, M. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000345 · Cited by 82
Cognitive Load Theory, Resource Depletion and the Delayed Testing Effect
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09476-2 · Cited by 59
Self-citationEndres, T., Lovell, O., Morkunas, D., Rieß, W., & Renkl, A. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12563 · Cited by 57
Stenlund, T., Jönsson, F. U., & Jonsson, B. (2016) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2016.1143087 · Cited by 67
Yeo, D. J. S., & Fazio, L. K. (2018) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000268 · Cited by 64
Extending the testing effect to self-regulated learning
Fernandez, J., & Jamet, É. (2016) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-016-9163-9 · Cited by 57
Investigating the testing effect: Retrieval as a characteristic of effective study strategies
Bae, C. L. L., Therriault, D. J., & Redifer, J. L. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.008 · Cited by 54
Retrieval Practice Benefits Deductive Inference
Eglington, L. G., & Kang, S. H. K. (2016) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9386-y · Cited by 47
Ebersbach, M., Feierabend, M., & Nazari, K. B. B. (2020) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3639 · Cited by 45
Complexity affects performance, cognitive load, and awareness
Zeitlhofer, I., Zumbach, J., & Schweppe, J. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102001 · Cited by 58
The Status of the Testing Effect for Complex Materials: Still a Winner
Rawson, K. A. (2015) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9308-4 · Cited by 43
When Instructional Guidance is Needed
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2016) · The Educational and Developmental Psychologist · doi:10.1017/edp.2016.16 · Cited by 43
Self-citationMorphew, J., da Silva, M. R., Herman, G. L., & West, M. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3605 · Cited by 44
Hoch, E., Sidi, Y., Ackerman, R., Hoogerheide, V., & Scheiter, K. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09779-5 · Cited by 41
Tests and academic cheating: do learning tasks influence cheating by way of negative evaluations?
Wenzel, K., & Reinhard, M. (2020) · Social Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s11218-020-09556-0 · Cited by 50
Cognitive Load Theory, Element Interactivity, and the Testing and Reverse Testing Effects
Hanham, J., Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2017) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3324 · Cited by 36
Self-citationUndesirable Difficulty Effects in the Learning of High-Element Interactivity Materials
Chen, O., Castro-Alonso, J. C., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & Sweller, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01483 · Cited by 41
Self-citationTesting Is More Desirable When It Is Adaptive and Still Desirable When Compared to Note-Taking
Heitmann, S., Grund, A., Berthold, K., Fries, S., & Roelle, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02596 · Cited by 30
Does Providing Prompts During Retrieval Practice Improve Learning?
Smith, M. A., Blunt, J. R., Whiffen, J. W., & Karpicke, J. D. (2016) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3227 · Cited by 33
Facilitating transfer through incorrect examples and explanatory feedback
Corral, D., & Carpenter, S. K. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021820909454 · Cited by 26
Belda-Medina, J. R., & Kokošková, V. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2024.2435900 · Cited by 40
Ebersbach, M., & Nazari, K. B. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00811 · Cited by 23
Teplitski, M., Irani, T. A., Krediet, C. J., Cesare, M. D., & Marvasi, M. (2018) · Journal of Food Science Education · doi:10.1111/1541-4329.12129 · Cited by 26
A database of general knowledge question performance in older adults
Coane, J. H., & Umanath, S. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01493-2 · Cited by 23
Sepp, S., Wong, M., Hoogerheide, V., & Castro-Alonso, J. C. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12715 · Cited by 31
Emerging and Future Directions in Test-Enhanced Learning Research
Pan, S. C., Dunlosky, J. T., Xu, K. M., & Ouwehand, K. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09857-2 · Cited by 29
Retrieval Practice Enhances Analogical Problem Solving
Wong, S. S. H., Ng, G. J. P., Tempel, T., & Lim, S. W. H. (2017) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2017.1409185 · Cited by 22
Nip, T., Gunter, E. L., Herman, G. L., Morphew, J., & West, M. (2018) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3159450.3159500 · Cited by 18
Yan, V. X., Sana, F., & Carvalho, P. F. (2023) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/23727322231218906 · Cited by 26
Wenzel, K., & Reinhard, M. (2019) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2019.101405 · Cited by 22
Remote Interview Methods in Chemical Education Research
Trate, J. M., Teichert, M. A., Murphy, K. L., Srinivasan, S., Luxford, C. J., & Schneider, J. L. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00680 · Cited by 16
Pyke, W., Lunau, J., & Javadi, A.-H. (2025) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218241308143 · Cited by 15
“…beneficial for such material (Chen et al., 2016b), research indicates that the generation effect diminishes or even reverses when dealing with high-element-interactivity tasks, such as complex problem-solving (Leahy et al., 2015; van Gog et al., 2015), for a review, see van Gog and Sweller (2015).”
Revisiting cognitive load theory: second thoughts and unaddressed questions
Leppink, J. (2020) · Scientia Medica · doi:10.15448/1980-6108.2020.1.36918 · Cited by 19
The testing effect and analogical problem-solving
Peterson, D. J., & Wissman, K. T. (2018) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2018.1491603 · Cited by 15
Greving, S., Lenhard, W., & Richter, T. (2022) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/00986283211061204 · Cited by 20
Wenzel, K., & Reinhard, M. (2021) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101706 · Cited by 15
Rummer, R., & Schweppe, J. (2021) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-021-00137-4 · Cited by 17
The Testing Effect in the Lecture Hall: Does it Depend on Learner Prerequisites?
Glaser, J., & Richter, T. (2022) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/14757257221136660 · Cited by 18
Weißgerber, S. C., & Rummer, R. (2022) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101679 · Cited by 14
Endres, T., & Eitel, A. (2023) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4160 · Cited by 16
Slomer, A., & Chenkin, J. (2017) · AEM Education and Training · doi:10.1002/aet2.10044 · Cited by 12
Chikha, H. B., Zoudji, B., & Khacharem, A. (2023) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-023-01806-y · Cited by 13
Wong, M., Castro-Alonso, J. C., Ayres, P., & PAAS, F. G. W. C. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429283895-7 · Cited by 13
The Use of Retrieval Practice in the Health Professions: A State-of-the-Art Review
Serra, M. J., Kaminske, A. N., Nebel, C. L., & Coppola, K. M. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15070974 · Cited by 20
Specific questions during retrieval practice are better for texts containing seductive details
Eitel, A., Endres, T., & Renkl, A. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3984 · Cited by 12
A Case Study of Using Test-Enhanced Learning as a Formative Assessment in High School Mathematics
Szeibert, J., Muzsnay, A., Szabó, C., & Zámbó, C. (2022) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-022-10264-8 · Cited by 17
Pilot Study on the Relationship of Test Anxiety to Utilizing Self-Testing in Self-Regulated Learning
Weißgerber, S. C., & Reinhard, M. (2018) · International Journal of Psychological Studies · doi:10.5539/ijps.v10n4p95 · Cited by 12
Degree of learning and linear forgetting
Fisher, J. S., & Radvansky, G. A. (2021) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218211056464 · Cited by 9
Frank, B., & Kluge, A. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s41449-018-00136-9 · Cited by 11
Indirekte Effekte von Abrufübungen – Intuitiv und doch häufig unterschätzt
Endres, T., & Renkl, A. (2021) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-021-00140-9 · Cited by 10
Explanations and Interactives Improve Subjective Experiences in Online Courseware
Thomas, M. P., Türkay, S., & Parker, M. J. (2017) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3076 · Cited by 9
Ruitenburg, S. K., Ackermans, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jarodzka, H., & Camp, G. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102027 · Cited by 13
Effects of making errors in learning a foreign language
Guzmán-Muñoz, F. J. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2020.1711766 · Cited by 12
Girard, O., Gaoua, N., Grantham, J., Knez, W. L., Walsh, A., & Racinais, S. (2021) · Temperature · doi:10.1080/23328940.2021.1959289 · Cited by 8
Kang, Y., Ha, H., & Lee, H. S. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09772-y · Cited by 7
Fraundorf, S. H., Caddick, Z. A., Nokes‐Malach, T. J., & Rottman, B. M. (2023) · Cognitive Research Principles and Implications · doi:10.1186/s41235-023-00508-8 · Cited by 10
Der Testungseffekt beim Lernen mit Texten
Rummer, R. (2021) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000518 · Cited by 8
Jakobsson, A., Loberg, J. M., & Kjörk, M. (2023) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2023.2283906 · Cited by 10
Hartman, J. D., & Eichler, J. F. (2024) · Education sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14111224 · Cited by 6
Abrufeffekte im Gedächtnis: Ein Überblick zur aktuellen Grundlagenforschung
Tempel, T., & Pastötter, B. (2021) · Psychologische Rundschau · doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000517 · Cited by 8
Retrieval practice can improve classroom review despite low practice test performance
Leggett, J. M. I., Burt, J. S., & Carroll, A. (2019) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3517 · Cited by 10
Achieving Testing Effects in an Authentic College Classroom
Shobe, E. R. (2021) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1177/00986283211015669 · Cited by 7
Berger, R., Kulgemeyer, C., & Lensing, P. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/s40573-019-00099-2 · Cited by 6
Howe, P. D. L., McKague, M., Lodge, J. M., Blunden, A. G., & Saw, G. (2018) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725718764181 · Cited by 6
The testing effect under divided attention: Educational application.
Buchin, Z. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2019) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000230 · Cited by 8
May, B. M. (2021) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2021.1961034 · Cited by 8
Active Retrieval Improves Procedural Learning in Orthopedic Surgery
Ndoja, S., Dion, C.-A. B., Pirshahid, A. A., Charron, B. P., Durocher, A. M., McCarton, A., & LeBel, M. (2022) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.001 · Cited by 7
Sumeracki, M. A., Nebel, C. L., Kaminske, A. N., & Kuepper-Tetzel, C. (2024) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09854-5 · Cited by 4
Impact of different practice testing methods on learning outcomes
Akbulut, Y. (2024) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.12626 · Cited by 6
Norman, G. R. (2016) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-016-9671-z · Cited by 5
Rachatasumrit, N., Koedinger, K. R., & Carvalho, P. F. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00511-8 · Cited by 6
Wang, M., Yang, M., & Kyle, W. C. (2023) · Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research · doi:10.1186/s43031-023-00083-4 · Cited by 6
Do worked examples boost the spacing effect on lasting learning?
Krauspe, J., Ebersbach, M., Ludwig, A., & Scharf, F. (2025) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102103 · Cited by 5
Wie können Abrufübungen (nicht) für das Lernen in Schule und Hochschule relevant gemacht werden?
Roelle, J., Endres, T., & Renkl, A. (2021) · Unterrichtswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s42010-021-00139-2 · Cited by 4
Rachatasumrit, N., Carvalho, P. F., Li, S., & Koedinger, K. R. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36272-9_5 · Cited by 4
Test-Based Learning: Inconsistent Effects Between Higher- and Lower-Level Test Questions
Roelle, J., Roelle, D., & Berthold, K. (2018) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2018.1434756 · Cited by 4
Dechamps, T., & Skulmowski, A. (2025) · Trends in Neuroscience and Education · doi:10.1016/j.tine.2025.100256 · Cited by 3
Wang, J., & Huo, C. (2025) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-01-2025-0010 · Cited by 3
Retrieval Practice: A Tool for Teaching the Control-of-Variables Strategy in Science Classrooms?
Kranz, J., Möller, A., Kaufmann, K., & Tempel, T. (2024) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2024.2392684 · Cited by 8
Supporting comprehension: The advantages of multiple–choice over true—false practice tests
Hildenbrand, L., & Wiley, J. (2025) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-025-01726-9 · Cited by 3
Wilkinson, A. M., Hall, A. C. G., & Hogan, E. E. (2019) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2019.1632349 · Cited by 3
The Effect of Retrieval Practice on Transitive Inference
Picklesimer, M. E., Buchin, Z. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2019) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000467 · Cited by 4
Cadaret, C. N., & Yates, D. T. (2021) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.1093/jas/skab246 · Cited by 3
Sheykhmohammadi, N., Atashpendar, A., & Zampuniéris, D. (2024) · International Conference on Computer Supported Education · doi:10.5220/0012682500003693 · Cited by 3
Tordet, C., Fernandez, J., & Jamet, É. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13083 · Cited by 7
Behavioral Analytics for Distributed Practices in Programming Problem-Solving
Alzaid, M., & Hsiao, I. (2019) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie43999.2019.9028583 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- van Gog, T., & Sweller, J.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- van Gog, Tamara
- Venue
- Educational Psychology Review
- Published
- 2015-05-16
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-264
- ISSN
- 1040-726X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-336X
- OpenAlex
- W2128915986
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Educational Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (452‐11‐006)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- testing effect, learning complexity, element interactivity, long-term retention, practice tests, restudying, boundary conditions, retrieval practice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review