Cited by 39Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

Activities of daily living and working memory in pediatric attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Open access
Irwin, Lauren N., Soto, Elia F., Chan, Elizabeth S. M., Miller, Caroline E., Carrington-Forde, Shana, Groves, Nicole B., Kofler, Michael J.·2021·Child Neuropsychology

Abstract

Most children with ADHD have impaired working memory abilities. These working memory deficits predict impairments in activities of daily living (ADLs) for adults with ADHD. However, our understanding of the relation between pediatric ADHD and ADLs is limited. Thus, this study aimed to examine (1) the extent to which pediatric ADHD is associated with ADL difficulties; and if so (2) the extent to which these difficulties are related to their well-documented working memory difficulties and/or core ADHD inattentive and hyperactive/impulsive symptom domains. A well-characterized, clinically evaluated sample of 141 children ages 8–13 years (M = 10.36, SD = 1.46; 51 girls; 70% White/non-Hispanic) were administered a battery of well-validated working memory tests and assessed for ADHD symptoms (teacher-ratings) and ADL difficulties (parent-ratings); cross-informant reports were used to control for mono-informant bias. Children with ADHD exhibited medium magnitude difficulties with ADLs (d = 0.61, p < .005, 38% impaired). Results of the bias-corrected, bootstrapped conditional effects model indicated that lower working memory predicted reduced performance of age-expected ADLs (β =0.28) and greater ADHD inattentive (β = −0.40) and hyperactive/impulsive symptoms (β = −0.16). Greater inattentive, but not hyperactive/impulsive, symptoms predicted greater ADL difficulties (β = −0.36) even after controlling for working memory. Interestingly, working memory exerted a significant indirect effect on ADLs via inattentive (indirect effect: β = 0.15, effect ratio = .54) but not hyperactive/impulsive symptoms. These findings implicate ADHD inattentive symptoms as a potential mechanism underlying ADL difficulties for children with ADHD, both independently and via working memory’s role in regulating attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09297049.2020.1866521

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Group-level impairment estimates do not necessarily inform between-person heterogeneity in executive function across individual youth with ADHD and ASD.

    “estimates of group-level impairments do not necessarily inform between-person heterogeneity in executive function across individual youth with ADHD and ASD.”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [90]

    The Discussion > Limitations section describes well-documented heterogeneity in executive functioning among children with ADHD, while the Results report a group-level working-memory difference. This supports the distinction for ADHD, but the paper does not establish it for youth with ASD; its discussion of ASD concerns activities of daily living. Page numbers were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Across meta-analyses using traditional neuropsychological executive function tests for children with ADHD, 33%-50% of cases exhibited executive function deficits, including 30%-37% with impaired working memory and 21%-46% with impaired inhibitory control.

    “across meta-analyses using traditional neuropsychological executive function tests for children with ADHD, 33%-50% of cases exhibited executive function deficits (30%-37% impaired working memory, 21%-46% impaired inhibitory control).90,144–149”

    From Executive function deficits in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [90]

    The ‘Working Memory Impairments in ADHD’ section reports executive-function and working-memory deficits in children with ADHD and cites meta-analytic evidence. It does not give the claimed 33%–50%, 30%–37%, or 21%–46% ranges, or an inhibitory-control estimate; instead, it says a majority have at least one executive-function impairment and gives a 62%–85% working-memory prevalence. The copy does not establish whether its estimates used the traditional tests specified in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Conners CK, Pitkanen J, & Rzepa SR (2011). Conners 3rd Edition (Conners 3; Conners 2008). Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. New York, NY: Springer, 675– 678.
  2. Wechsler D (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  3. Wechsler D (2014). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth/Fifth Edition. San Antonio: Pearson.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irwin, L. N., Soto, E. F., Chan, E. S. M., Miller, C. E., Carrington-Forde, S., Groves, N. B., & Kofler, M. J.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kofler, Michael J.
Venue
Child Neuropsychology
Published
2021-01-18
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
468-490
ISSN
  • 0929-7049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-4136
OpenAlex
W3122682726
Cited by
39
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Neuropsychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH115048)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
activities of daily living, working memory, inattentive symptoms, hyperactive-impulsive symptoms, everyday problems, indirect effects, attentional control, children
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Memory Disorders, Memory, Short-Term

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review