Cited by 39Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAction Observation and SynchronizationChild and Animal Learning Development

Empathizing with sensory and movement differences: moving toward sensitive understanding of autism

Open access
Kapp, Steven K.·2013·Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience

Abstract

The autism diagnosis requires deficits in social interaction and communication, yet neither occurs in isolation.This brief literature-based analysis provides evidence that other factors are involved in autistic people's atypical social communication.The brain is a complicated system where regions serve multiple, general, and overlapping roles.Sensorimotor and broad cognitive processes underlie both neurotypicals' and autistics' social cognition and behavior.Sensory strengths sometimes underlie autistic people's difficulties, especially in dynamic contexts that require multimodal integration.Social abilities and behaviors occur between people in social contexts, and autistic and neurotypical people share mutual difficulties in understanding one another.This paper challenges attempts to reduce autism to social deficits, and suggests the need for better interpersonal and societal understanding of and support for autistic people.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnint.2013.00038

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social communication always results from broad factors within and between people.

    “social communication always results from broad factors within and between people [36, 37].”

    From Lobbying Autism's Diagnostic Revision in the DSM-5 (2020) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 132 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapp, S. K.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Kapp, Steven K.
Venue
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Published
2013
Volume
7
Pages
38-38
ISSN
1662-5145 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996572777
Cited by
39
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sensory differences, social cognition, social communication, sensorimotor processing, multimodal integration, autism support, neurodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review