CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 118Family and Disability Support ResearchAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily Dynamics and Relationships

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender Differences When Parenting Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Multilevel Modeling Approach

Jones, Leah, Totsika, Vasiliki, Hastings, Richard P., Petalas, Michael A.·2013·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1756-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Parenting a child with autism may differentially affect mothers and fathers. Existing studies of mother-father differences often ignore the interdependence of data within families. We investigated gender differences within-families using multilevel linear modeling. Mothers and fathers of children with autism (161 couples) reported on their own well-being, and their child's functioning. Mothers reported higher levels of distress compared with fathers, and child behavior problems predicted psychological distress for both mothers and fathers. We found little evidence of child functioning variables affecting mothers and fathers differently. Gender differences in the impact of child autism on parents appear to be robust. More family systems research is required to fully understand these gender differences and the implications for family support.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-012-1756-9

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hastings, R. P., & Taunt, H. M. (2002). Positive perceptions in families of children with developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107(2), 116–127. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2002)107<0116:PPIFOC>2.0.CO;2 . · DOI
  2. Seligman, M., & Darling, R. B. (1997). Ordinary families: Special children. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  3. Sparrow, S. S., Cicchetti, D. V., & Balla, D. A. (2005). Vineland II adaptive behaviour scales. A revision of the Vineland social maturity scale by Edgar A. Doll. Survey interview form. Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–118 of 118

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jones, L., Totsika, V., Hastings, R. P., & Petalas, M. A.
Affiliations
Bangor University (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, Leah
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-01-10
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
2090-2098
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
DOI
10.1007/s10803-012-1756-9
OpenAlex
W2090116207
Cited by
116
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, parenting, gender differences, mothers, fathers, parental psychological distress, child behavior problems, family systems, parental well-being, child functioning
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review