Cited by 1,163Family and Disability Support ResearchAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The impact of behaviour problems on caregiver stress in young people with autism spectrum disorders

Lecavalier, L., Leone, S., Wiltz, J.·2006·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine the correlates of caregiver stress in a large sample of young people with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Two main objectives were to: (1) disentangle the effects of behaviour problems and level of functioning on caregiver stress; and (2) measure the stability of behaviour problems and caregiver stress. METHODS: Parents or teachers of 293 young people with ASDs completed measures of stress, behaviour problems and social competence. Parents also completed an adaptive behaviour scale. Eighty-one young people were rated twice at a 1-year interval. RESULTS: Parents and teachers did not perfectly agree on the nature and severity of behaviour problems. However, both sets of ratings indicated that behaviour problems were strongly associated with stress. Conduct problems in particular were significant predictors of stress. Adaptive skills were not significantly associated with caregiver stress. Parental reports of behaviour problems and stress were quite stable over the 1-year interval, much more so than teacher reports. Parent ratings suggested that behaviour problems and stress exacerbated each other over time. This transactional model did not fit the teacher data. CONCLUSION: Results of this study suggested that it is a specific group of externalized behaviours that are the most strongly associated with both parent and teacher stress. Results were discussed from methodological and conceptual perspectives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2005.00732.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lecavalier, L., Leone, S., & Wiltz, J.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Lecavalier, L.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-09-21
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
172-183
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W2143198635
Cited by
1,163
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 83 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 89 · 2013: 76 · 2012: 57
FWCI
19.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ohio Department of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, caregiver stress, behavioral problems, conduct problems, externalizing problems, parent-teacher agreement, adaptive behavior, social competence, transactional model, longitudinal stability, autistic youth
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Behavior Therapy, Mental Disorders, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Personality Assessment, Psychometrics, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Psychological, Observer Variation, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review