Cited by 4Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support ResearchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Using the Three-Minute Speech Sample to Examine the Parent-Adolescent Relationship in Autistic Youth: A Qualitative Analysis

Open access
Greenlee, Jessica L., Stelter, Claire R., Hickey, Emily, Burton, Casey, Carlson, Megan, Winter, Marcia A.·2024·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Purpose This qualitative study examines autistic adolescents' perception of the quality of their relationship with their parent using the Three Minute Speech Sample.Methods Twenty autistic youth (13-17 years; 83% male) spoke, uninterrupted, for three minutes about their thoughts and feelings regarding their mothers. Audio-recorded speech samples were transcribed and coded for emergent themes.Results Adolescents highlighted emotional support and acceptance in the context of their relationship, support mothers provide for mental health, love and caring, efforts to build the relationship through shared activities, and areas of adolescent-parent conflict.Conclusion The TMSS is a low cost, low burden method by which autistic adolescents can comfortably and effectively self-report the quality of their relationship with their parent/caregiver.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-023-05942-7

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Short, unstructured speech samples have shown strong validity in diverse and vulnerable populations, including adolescents and caregivers from low-income backgrounds.

    “Short, unstructured speech samples have shown strong validity in diverse and vulnerable populations, including adolescents [25] and caregivers from low-income backgrounds [26].”

    From Motherhood in adolescence: a qualitative study of the lived experience of participants in a perinatal home-visiting intervention (2026) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Discussion reports that autistic adolescents completed the short speech-sample task without distress and provided detailed accounts of their relationships. It also calls for further research to establish the method’s validity and notes that the sample was mostly White and from well-resourced families. Thus, this source supports its use with adolescents, but not a claim of strong validity across diverse adolescent populations. The low-income-caregiver portion is attributed to a separate citation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. de Clercq LE, Prinzie P, Swerts C, Ortibus E, & de Pauw SSW (2022). “ Tell me about your child, the relationship with your child and your parental experiences”: A qualitative study of spontaneous speech samples among parents raising a child with and without Autism Spectrum Disorder, cerebral palsy or Down Syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 34(2), 295– 329. 10.1007/S10882-021-09800-1/FIGURES/1 · DOI
  2. Hesse-Biber SN, & Leavy P (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of Emergent Methods. The Guilford Press.
  3. Weston S, Hawes DJ, & Pasalich SD,. (2017). The Five Minute Speech Sample as a measure of parent–child dynamics: Evidence from observational research. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(1), 118– 136. 10.1007/S10826-016-0549-8/TABLES/2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenlee, J. L., Stelter, C. R., Hickey, E., Burton, C., Carlson, M., & Winter, M. A.
Affiliations
  • Lafayette College (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Children's Mercy Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Greenlee, Jessica L.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2023-04-06
Volume
54
Issue
6
Pages
2274-2285
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W4362658096
Cited by
4
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007489, U54HD090256)
  • Autism Speaks (10654)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autistic adolescents, parent-adolescent relationships, self-report, maternal relationships, emotional support, acceptance, parent-adolescent conflict, shared activities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Speech, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review