Cited by 151Family and Disability Support ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Mothers’ expressed emotion towards children with and without intellectual disabilities

Beck, A., Daley, D., Hastings, R. P., Stevenson, J.·2004·Journal of Intellectual Disability Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with maternal expressed emotion (EE) towards their child with intellectual disability (ID). DESIGN AND METHOD: A total of 33 mothers who had a child with ID and at least one child without disabilities between the ages of 4 and 14 years participated in the study. Mothers completed self-assessment questionnaires which addressed their sense of parenting competence, beliefs about child-rearing practices, and their reports of behavioural and emotional problems of their child with ID. Telephone interviews were conducted to assess maternal EE towards the child with ID and towards a sibling using the Five Minute Speech Sample (FMSS; Magana et al. 1986), and also to assess the adaptive behaviour of the child with ID using the Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale (VABS; Sparrow et al. 1984). RESULTS: Mothers with high EE towards their child with ID were more satisfied with their parenting ability, and their children had more behaviour problems. Analysis of differential maternal parenting, through comparisons of EE towards their two children, showed that mothers were more negative towards their child with ID for all domains of the FMSS except dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: A small number of factors associated with maternal EE towards children with ID were identified. Differences in maternal EE towards their child with ID and their other child suggest that EE is child-driven rather than a general maternal characteristic. Implications of the data for future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00564.x

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beck, A., Daley, D., Hastings, R. P., & Stevenson, J.
Affiliations
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Daley, D.
Venue
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-09-07
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
628-638
ISSN
  • 0964-2633 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2788
OpenAlex
W2148307693
Cited by
151
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
intellectual disability, mothers, parenting competence, child-rearing beliefs, child behavior problems, sibling comparison, adaptive behavior
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Maternal Behavior, Intellectual Disability, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Parenting, Children with Disabilities, Disabled Children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review