Cited by 17Reproductive Biology and FertilityGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species

The use of oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation in patients with sex chromosome disorders: a case series describing outcomes

Open access
Martel, Rachel A., Blakemore, Jennifer K., Fino, M. Elizabeth·2022·Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Abstract

Purpose Characterize outcomes among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with sex chromosome disorders (SCDs) after oocyte cryopreservation (OC) consultation.Methods Retrospective case series of all AYA (< 25 years) patients with SCDs seen for OC consultation from 2011 to 2019 at a large, urban, academic fertility center. All AYA patients with an SCD seen for OC consult in the study time period were reviewed and included. Data collected included patient age, SCD type, number of patients who attempted OC, number of cycles attempted, and cycle outcomes.Results Twenty-two patients were included: 9 with Turner syndrome, 12 with mosaic Turner syndrome, and 1 with 47,XXX. Mean age at consult was 14.7 ± 3.5 years. Fourteen patients elected for OC: 5 with Turner syndrome, 8 with mosaic Turner syndrome, and 1 47,XXX who pursued 31 OC cycles total. Of those 14 patients, 10 underwent retrieval, 9 froze oocytes, and 8 froze mature (MII) oocytes. Seven patients underwent > 1 cycle and 7 had ≥ 1 cancelation. 3/3 patients who pursued cycles after 1st cancelation never got to retrieval. Age, SCD type, and baseline FSH did not predict ability to freeze MIIs. One patient returned after OC and attempted 4 ovulation induction cycles and 2 IVF cycles; all were canceled for low response.Conclusions AYA patients with SCDs have a high risk of poor response and cycle cancelation but the majority froze MIIs. Thus, setting expectations is important. A larger sample size is needed to evaluate possible clinical predictors of success.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10815-022-02469-1

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Published data regarding oocyte cryopreservation in individuals with TS entails six retrospective studies and eight case reports comprising a total of 80 individuals ranging in age from 7 to 30 years.

    “To date, published data regarding oocyte cryopreservation in individuals with TS entails six retrospective studies and eight case reports comprising a total of 80 individuals ranging in age from 7 to 30 years.578,591,596-607”
  • In one retrospective study, Martel et al. found age, karyotype, and FSH had no correlation with the number of vitrified oocytes.

    “In one retrospective study Martel at al. found that age, karyotype and FSH had no correlation with the number of vitrified oocytes,599 while in the largest retrospective study to date Nadesapillai et al. reported that the percentage of 46, XX cells, FSH, AMH and antral follicle count had a significant correlation with the cumulative number of vitrified oocytes.578”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martel, R. A., Blakemore, J. K., & Fino, M. E.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
Corresponding author
Martel, Rachel A.
Venue
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Published
2022-03-23
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
1143-1153
ISSN
  • 0740-7769 (ISSN-L)
  • 1058-0468
  • 1573-7330
OpenAlex
W4220672937
Cited by
17
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
Keywords
oocyte cryopreservation, fertility preservation, sex chromosome abnormalities, Turner syndrome, mosaic Turner syndrome, 47,XXX, adolescents and young adults, oocyte retrieval, metaphase II oocytes, poor ovarian response, cycle cancellation, ovulation induction, in vitro fertilization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Oocytes, Retrospective Studies, Sex Chromosome Aberrations, Trisomy, Turner Syndrome, Cryopreservation, Chromosomes, Human, X, Oocyte Retrieval, Sex Chromosome Disorders of Sex Development, Fertility Preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review