CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 261Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Barriers to Seeking Help for Gambling Problems: A Review of the Empirical Literature

Suurvali, Helen, Cordingley, Joanne, Hodgins, David C., Cunningham, John·2009·Journal of Gambling Studies
DOI 10.1007/s10899-009-9129-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This literature review summarizes recent empirical research on obstacles preventing problem gamblers from seeking treatment for their gambling problems. Relevant databases and bibliographies were searched for English-language papers and reports published since 1998. The only methodological requirement was that gamblers themselves be asked about reasons for not seeking help. Nineteen studies conducted in five countries were identified. All except one targeted adults. Despite differences in methodology, many of the same barriers to treatment were identified. Most commonly reported barriers were: wish to handle problem by oneself; shame/embarrassment/stigma; unwillingness to admit problem; and issues with treatment itself. The authors of the review argue that unwillingness to admit to the problem may be even more prevalent than is typically indicated by the results of barriers studies. Other frequently reported barriers included lack of knowledge about treatment options and practical issues around attending treatment. More research is needed on barriers to treatment-seeking experienced by subgroups of gamblers defined by culture, ethnicity, gender, age. Open-ended questioning methods can help provide insights into what barrier categories mean to different groups and individuals. Input directly from gamblers can be combined with information from other kinds of studies to devise better ways of reaching problem gamblers, especially those in underserviced populations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10899-009-9129-9

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Ferris, J., & Wynne, H. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index: Final report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
  2. Mansley, C., Skitch, S. A., & Hodgins, D. D. (2004). Seeking help for gambling problems: A view from the inside. Presented at Insight Nova Scotia––International Problem Gambling Conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia.
  3. Ministry of Health. (2007). Preventing and minimising gambling harm. Three-year service plan 2007–2010. Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Health.
  4. Nett, J. C., & Schatzmann, S. (2005). Pathological Gambling: Barriers to treatment and the experience of self-change. Presented at Gambling Prevention and Research: From Legislation to Action––March 1–2, 2005. Lausanne, Centre du Jeu Excessif.
  5. Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Gibbon, M., & First, M. B. (1990). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, Users Guide. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press. (cited in Hodgins & el-Guebaly, 2000).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Suurvali, H., Cordingley, J., Hodgins, D. C., & Cunningham, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Suurvali, Helen
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Gambling Studies
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2009-06-24
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
407-424
ISSN
  • 1050-5350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3602
DOI
10.1007/s10899-009-9129-9
OpenAlex
W2063516642
Cited by
261
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Gambling Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
problem gambling, barriers to treatment, help-seeking, stigma and shame, self-help, treatment knowledge, underserved populations
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Communication Barriers, Denial, Psychological, Female, Gambling, Humans, Internal-External Control, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Self Care, Social Environment, Socioeconomic Factors, Behavior, Addictive, Patient Satisfaction, Self Efficacy, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review