Cited by 49Youth Substance Use and School AttendanceSchool Health and Nursing EducationBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Relationship between school refusal behavior and social functioning: a cluster analysis approach

Open access
Gonzálvez, Carolina, Inglés, Cándido J., Kearney, Christopher A., Sanmartín, Ricardo, Vicent, María, García-Fernández, José M.·2019·European Journal of Education and Psychology

Abstract

On the basis of the heterogeneous casuistry that characterizes the students who refuse going to school, it is useful to have a classification of this population in homogeneous groups. For this, the aim of this study was, first, to identify by cluster analysis the profiles of school refusal behavior based on the functional model evaluated through the School Refusal Assessment Scale-Revised (SRAS-S). Secondly, it is intended to analyze if there are differences in social functioning scores according to the school refusal profiles identified. This study involved 1212 Spanish children between 8 and 11 years old (M=9.12, SD=1.05) who completed the SRAS-R to evaluate the school refusal behavior and the Child and Adolescent Social Adaptive Functioning Scale (CASAFS) to assess social functioning. Four profiles were identified: Non-school refusers, School refusers by mixed reinforcements, School refusers by tangible reinforcements and School refusers by negative reinforcements. The profile of Non-school refusers achieved the highest average scores in social functioning, while School refusers by mixed reinforcements group obtained the lowest average scores in social functioning. In general, the profiles found support the clusters identified in previous studies. The implications of social functioning on school refusal behavior are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30552/ejep.v12i1.238

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonzálvez, C., Inglés, C. J., Kearney, C. A., Sanmartín, R., Vicent, M., & García-Fernández, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Alicante (ES)
  • Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Venue
European Journal of Education and Psychology
Published
2019-04-17
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
17-29
ISSN
  • 1888-8992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1989-2209
OpenAlex
W2936092044
Cited by
49
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
FWCI
12.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Education and Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Digital Scholarship - UNLV (University of Nevada Reno) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • RUA, Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante (Universidad de Alicante) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
school refusal, social functioning, children, adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review