Cited by 50Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

Monoamine Oxidase A (MAOA) and Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) Gene Polymorphisms Interact with Maternal Parenting in Association with Adolescent Reactive Aggression but not Proactive Aggression: Evidence of Differential Susceptibility

Zhang, Wenxin, Cao, Cong, Wang, Meiping, Ji, Linqin, Cao, Yanmiao·2016·Journal of Youth and Adolescence

Abstract

To date, whether and how gene-environment (G × E) interactions operate differently across distinct subtypes of aggression remains untested. More recently, in contrast with the diathesis-stress hypothesis, an alternative hypothesis of differential susceptibility proposes that individuals could be differentially susceptible to environments depending on their genotypes in a "for better and for worse" manner. The current study examined interactions between monoamine oxidase A (MAOA) T941G and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) Val158Met polymorphisms with maternal parenting on two types of aggression: reactive and proactive. Moreover, whether these potential G × E interactions would be consistent with the diathesis-stress versus the differential susceptibility hypothesis was tested. Within the sample of 1399 Chinese Han adolescents (47.2 % girls, M age = 12.32 years, SD = 0.50), MAOA and COMT genes both interacted with positive parenting in their associations with reactive but not proactive aggression. Adolescents with T alleles/TT homozygotes of MAOA gene or Met alleles of COMT gene exhibited more reactive aggression when exposed to low positive parenting, but less reactive aggression when exposed to high positive parenting. These findings provide the first evidence for distinct G × E interaction effects on reactive versus proactive aggression and lend further support for the differential susceptibility hypothesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10964-016-0442-1

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was a significant Val158Met x positive parenting interaction on reactive aggression: Met carriers + positive parenting < Val/Val + positive parenting.

    “Significant Val158Met x positive parenting on reactive aggression: Met carriers + positive parenting < Val/Val + positive parenting.”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang [54]

  • There was no significant interaction between Val158Met x parenting on proactive aggression.

    “N.S. interaction between Val158Met x parenting on proactive aggression.”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang [54]

  • There was no significant interaction between T941G x parenting on proactive aggression.

    “N.S. interaction between T941G x parenting on proactive aggression.”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang [54]

  • There was a significant T941G x positive parenting interaction on reactive aggression: T alleles/TT homozygotes + positive parenting < G alleles/GG homozygotes + positive parenting.

    “Significant T941G x positive parenting on reactive aggression: T alleles/TT homozygotes + positive parenting < G alleles/GG homozygotes + positive parenting.”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as Zhang [54]

  • In a study on Chinese early adolescents, Val/Val carriers displayed higher reactive aggression compared to Met-allele carriers in the context of higher positive parenting scores, but lower reactive aggression compared to Met-allele carriers with lower positive parenting scores.

    “In a study on Chinese early adolescents, Val/Val carriers were reported to display higher reactive aggression compared to Met-allele carriers in the context of higher positive parenting scores, but lower reactive aggression compared to Met-allele carriers with lower positive parenting scores [54].”

    From Genetics of child aggression, a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [54]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, W., Cao, C., Wang, M., Ji, L., & Cao, Y.
Affiliations
Shandong Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Wenxin
Venue
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Published
2016-03-01
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
812-829
ISSN
  • 0047-2891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6601
OpenAlex
W2288804401
Cited by
50
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31271105)
  • Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20133704110001)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Provicne (ZR2014CQ030)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
monoamine oxidase A, catechol-O-methyltransferase, COMT Val158Met polymorphism, gene-environment interaction, differential susceptibility hypothesis, maternal care, positive parenting, reactive aggression, proactive aggression, adolescent aggression
MeSH terms
Aggression, Alleles, Catechol O-Methyltransferase, Child, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Maternal Behavior, Monoamine Oxidase, Polymorphism, Genetic, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review