Cited by 90Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsFlow Experience in Various FieldsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Do implicit motives and basic psychological needs interact to predict well-being and flow? Testing a universal hypothesis and a matching hypothesis

Open access
Schüler, Julia, Brandstätter, Veronika, Sheldon, Kennon M.·2013·Motivation and Emotion

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11031-012-9317-2

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no conceptual one-to-one relation between motives for power, achievement, and affiliation, as conceived within Motive Disposition Theory, and BPNT's basic needs.

    “Further, although a number of studies (e.g., Schüler et al. 2013) have looked for moderating effects of motives for power, achievement, and affiliation, as conceived within Motive Disposition Theory, there is no conceptual one-toone relation between these motives, denoting interindividual differences, and BPNT's basic needs (see Ryan et al. 2019a).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cohen, P., Cohen, J., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis fort the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  2. deCharms, R. (1968/1983). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press.
  3. Jackson, D. N. (1984). Personality research form manual. Port Huron, MI: Research Psychologists Press.
  4. Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Engeser, S. (2003). Die Erfassung des Flow Erlebens [Measuring flow experience]. In J. Stiensme- ier-Pelster & F. Rheinberg (Eds.), Diagnostik von Motivation und Selbstkonzept (pp. 261-279). Go ¨ttingen: Hogrefe.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schüler, J., Brandstätter, V., & Sheldon, K. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Schüler, Julia
Venue
Motivation and Emotion
Published
2012-08-08
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
480-495
ISSN
  • 0146-7239 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6644
OpenAlex
W2316152552
Cited by
90
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Motivation and Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Flow Experience in Various Fields
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
implicit motives, basic psychological needs, achievement motive, matching hypothesis, self-determination theory, well-being, flow, need satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review