Cited by 173Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

Depression and Cognitive Control across the Lifespan: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Dotson, Vonetta M., McClintock, Shawn M., Verhaeghen, Paul, Kim, Joseph U., Draheim, Amanda A., Syzmkowicz, Sarah M., Gradone, Andrew M., Bogoian, Hannah R. +1 more·2020·Neuropsychology Review

Abstract

Depression has been shown to negatively impact neurocognitive functions, particularly those governed by fronto-subcortical networks, such as executive functions. Converging evidence suggests that depression-related executive dysfunction is greater at older ages, however, this has not been previously confirmed by meta-analysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, using three-level models, on peer-reviewed studies that examined depression-related differences in cognitive control in healthy community-dwelling individuals of any age. We focused on studies of cognitive control as defined by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework, which centers on goal-directed behavior, such as goal selection (updating, representations, maintenance), response selection (inhibition or suppression), and performance monitoring. In 16,806 participants aged 7 to 97 across 76 studies, both clinical depression and subthreshold depressive symptoms were associated with cognitive control deficits (Hedges' g = -0.31). This relationship was stronger in study samples with an older mean age. Within studies with a mean age of 39 years or higher, which represents the median age in our analyses, the relationship was stronger in clinical compared to subthreshold depression and in individuals taking antidepressant medication. These findings highlight the importance of clinicians screening for cognitive control dysfunction in patients with depression, particularly in later stages of adulthood.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11065-020-09436-6

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dotson, V. M., McClintock, S. M., Verhaeghen, P., Kim, J. U., Draheim, A. A., Syzmkowicz, S. M., Gradone, A. M., Bogoian, H. R., & Wit, L. D.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Dotson, Vonetta M.
Venue
Neuropsychology Review
Published
2020-05-08
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
461-476
ISSN
  • 1040-7308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6660
OpenAlex
W3022076523
Cited by
173
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 5
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuropsychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • Georgia State University (Brains & Behavior Graduate Fellowship)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depression, cognitive control, executive function, executive dysfunction, lifespan development, aging, subthreshold depression, major depressive disorder, antidepressants, response inhibition, performance monitoring, goal-directed behavior, Research Domain Criteria
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Cognition, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Longevity, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Young Adult, Executive Function, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review