The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 15 of the 44 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities
Open accessAbstract
Given the paucity of empirically based health promotion interventions designed by and for American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian (i.e., Native) communities, researchers and partnering communities have had to rely on the adaptation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) designed for non-Native populations, a decidedly sub-optimal approach. Native communities have called for development of Indigenous health promotion programs in which their cultural worldviews and protocols are prioritized in the design, development, testing, and implementation. There is limited information regarding how Native communities and scholars have successfully collaborated to design and implement culturally based prevention efforts "from the ground up." Drawing on five diverse community-based Native health intervention studies, we describe strategies for designing and implementing culturally grounded models of health promotion developed in partnership with Native communities. Additionally, we highlight indigenist worldviews and protocols that undergird Native health interventions with an emphasis on the incorporation of (1) original instructions, (2) relational restoration, (3) narrative-[em]bodied transformation, and (4) indigenist community-based participatory research (ICBPR) processes. Finally, we demonstrate how culturally grounded interventions can improve population health when they prioritize local Indigenous knowledge and health-positive messages for individual to multi-level community interventions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
28 No basis given · 20 Sources not found · 16 Own interpretation · 15 Own method · 9 No full text of the sources · 8 Partly supported · 7 Supported · 2 Own result · 1 Not checked yet · accuracy not yet measured
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Qungasvik (“koo-ngaz-vick,” meaning tool box) is a strengths-based Yup’ik community-developed and driven intervention that builds protection against alcohol misuse and suicide among Yup’ik Alaska Native youth 12–18 years old (Rasmus, Charles, & Mohatt, 2014).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being > RR Exemplar: The Qungasvik (Toolbox) Prevention Approach
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Rasmus, Charles, & Mohatt, 2014 source
The Abstract describes Qungasvik as a community-developed Yup’ik toolbox whose modules build protection against suicide and alcohol abuse. The “From Entry to Implementation in a CBPR Intervention Process” section says the community chose a strengths-focused intervention for youth ages 12–18, aimed at those two concerns. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A protective cultural experience explicitly links a cultural activity to underlying protective factors described through previous research with Yup’ik communities to build strengths that foster reasons for life and protection against alcohol misuse (Allen, Mohatt, Beehler, & Rowe, 2014).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being > RR Exemplar: The Qungasvik (Toolbox) Prevention Approach
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Allen, Mohatt, Beehler, & Rowe, 2014 source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Qungasvik engages youth with their community using a cultural process of project implementation, relational and intergenerational instruction, and knowledge transmission (Rasmus, et al. 2014).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being > RR Exemplar: The Qungasvik (Toolbox) Prevention Approach
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Rasmus, et al. 2014 source
The Abstract describes Qungasvik as a community-driven, culturally grounded process whose modules engage youth and the community. The Yup’ik Kinship Terms case example (page not specified) describes Elders guiding families and teaching parents and youth about names, kinship roles, and traditions, supporting the claim about relational and intergenerational knowledge transmission. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Calls for centering IK in health intervention research follow the egregious mistreatment of Native people over the course of colonial and imperial histories in tandem with the advent of modern science (Walters et al, 2011).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Walters et al, 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Historically Traumatic Events section (page unavailable) documents centuries of colonial violence and suppression of Native cultural practices. The Introduction (page unavailable) calls for more research on historical trauma and draws on an Indigenous health framework. Our copy does not connect that history to calls for centering Indigenous Knowledge in health intervention research or to the advent of modern science. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“In a recent comparative effectiveness study, researchers found that this intervention shows promise in lowering suicide risks (Allen, Rasmus, Fok, Henry, and Qungasvik Team (2017).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being > RR Exemplar: The Qungasvik (Toolbox) Prevention Approach
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Allen, Rasmus, Fok, Henry, and Qungasvik Team (2017) source
The Abstract describes a comparison of higher- and lower-intensity Qungasvik intervention. The Discussion reports greater impact on outcomes protective from suicide risk at higher intensity and explicitly calls Qungasvik a promising approach to preventing suicide risk among rural Yup’ik Alaska Native youth. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Qungasvik focuses on providing protective cultural experiences for youth through the strength and resilience within their histories rooted in Yup’ik cultural ways of being (Ayunerak, Ahlstrom, Moses, Charlie, & Rasmus, 2014).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being > RR Exemplar: The Qungasvik (Toolbox) Prevention Approach
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Ayunerak, Ahlstrom, Moses, Charlie, & Rasmus, 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Editorial Conclusion describes an intervention that revitalizes Yup’ik cultural settings to support the survival, growth, and wellbeing of Yup’ik youth. “Revitalizing Culture and Context” also describes ancestral knowledge and traditional practices as ways to protect young people. Our copy does not identify that intervention as Qungasvik, so it does not substantiate the claim about Qungasvik specifically. (LLM, conf=0.83)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Indigenous communities have called for health interventions to be culturally centered (not just culturally tailored) since “culture is medicine” (Bassett et al., 2012).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Abstract
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Bassett et al., 2012 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion says the interviewed healers regarded culture as the primary vehicle for healing and articulated the principle that “culture is medicine.” The paper also describes calls for traditional healing to transform psychotherapy, but it does not establish a community-wide call for culturally centered interventions *instead of* culturally tailored ones; it describes its own intervention as culturally tailored (Original Research & Contributions). (LLM, conf=0.84)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Through focusing on a cultural activity (i.e., talking circle) with a common function of providing a space for group support, this health intervention increases the likelihood of generalizability to other nations (Rowan, 2014) while beginning at the ground level.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR) > ICBR Exemplar 2: Intertribal Talking Circle for the Prevention of Substance Abuse
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Rowan, 2014 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion proposes comparing cultural interventions by common functions as a possible way to address problems of generalization. The Results list a talking circle alongside peer support, but the paper does not show that focusing this particular health intervention on a talking circle increases its generalizability to other nations. (LLM, conf=0.86)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Qungasvik as a research project was initiated by Yup’ik Alaska Native communities facing serious disparities in youth suicide and alcohol misuse.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being > RR Exemplar: The Qungasvik (Toolbox) Prevention Approach
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The QM approach identified exposure to role models as one key protective factor experience as outcome from in this activity,”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being > RR Exemplar: The Qungasvik (Toolbox) Prevention Approach
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 38
- Probably not a substantial claim. 43
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Yappalli cultural innovation lies in incorporating experiential, outdoor and culturally specific trail-based activities to promote group cohesion (Schultz et al., 2016) and to increase connection to the ancestors and their OI.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research > OI Exemplar: Yappalli Choctaw Study
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Schultz et al., 2016 source
The Wilderness Experience Programming section describes Yappalli’s outdoor, experiential activities on a culturally significant trail. Results ([Re]connecting to the Body) say the experience fostered learning about one another, and Discussion (Future Research) identifies increased relationships with other tribal members as an outcome of the project. The citation is attached to group cohesion, not to the subsequent claim about Original Instructions; page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“While the Yappalli intervention centers on Native OI, traditions and culture, it also incorporates evidence-based prevention models including the information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model (Osborn, Amico, Fisher et al., 2010).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research > OI Exemplar: Yappalli Choctaw Study
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Osborn, Amico, Fisher et al., 2010 source
The Abstract identifies and tests the information-motivation-behavioral skills model in Puerto Ricans with type 2 diabetes, and the Discussion reports empirical support for its use in understanding diet behavior. The citation supports the identification of the IMB model as an evidence-based health-behavior framework; the statement about Yappalli's design is the citing authors' own description. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It was found not only to reduce SBP by 10 mmHg more than in a waitlist control but also to improve social functioning and perceptions of ethnic discrimination (Kaholokula et al., 2015).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Narrative-[em]Bodied Transformation (NeT): Strengthening Language, Dance, and Talking Story > NeT Exemplar: KaHOLO Project – Renewed Health Through Hula
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Kaholokula et al., 2015 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (Primary Outcome Analyses; page unavailable) report about 10 mmHg greater SBP reduction with Ola Hou than with the wait-list control. The Results (Secondary Outcome Analyses; page unavailable) report greater average improvement in social functioning, but the between-group difference was not statistically significant. The paper does not report measuring or improving perceptions of ethnic discrimination. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“IMB promotes increasing information/ knowledge in order to motivate behavioral change.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research > OI Exemplar: Yappalli Choctaw Study
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Osborn, Amico, Fisher et al., 2010 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The model description in the passage labeled Abstract identifies information and motivation as determinants of behavior, and the Discussion says interventions could target both. But the paper treats them as distinct: information is necessary but insufficient, and it does not say that increasing knowledge motivates behavioral change. (LLM, conf=0.85)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Native scholars propose that health intervention research should explicitly promote healing from well-being disruptions by building interventions from the culture or “from the ground up” (Walters et al., 2011).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > We Rise from Colonial Ashes: Growing Health Interventions from our Roots
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Walters et al., 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 'Pathways to Embodying HT' section discusses cultural protective factors that may buffer disruptions to wellness, and the Conclusion describes AIAN communities regenerating practices to heal (page numbers unavailable). Neither passage proposes that health intervention research should build interventions from the culture or 'from the ground up.' (LLM, conf=0.82)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“as Rowan (2014) notes, one solution is to compare cultural interventions based on their common functions or purpose they serve, (e.g., purification or increasing spiritual connection) versus on their distinctive forms (e.g., sweat lodge, dance).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > We Rise from Colonial Ashes: Growing Health Interventions from our Roots
What the sources say
- Supportedcites Rowan (2014) source
The Discussion explicitly proposes comparing Indigenous cultural interventions by their common functions rather than their distinctive forms as a way to address difficulties comparing programs and settings. The Future directions section likewise suggests a taxonomy based on function rather than form. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In particular, researchers have begun to examine the impact of inequities and intergenerational traumatic stress on physical health and how embodiment of these processes is multifaceted and influenced by social, cultural, economic, and biological processes; and this interconnectedness has gained acceptance in health interventions (Walters et al., 2011).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Narrative-[em]Bodied Transformation (NeT): Strengthening Language, Dance, and Talking Story > [Em]Bodied Narratives.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Walters et al., 2011 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All five health promotion intervention studies are led by Native Principal Investigators (PIs) or co-PIs in partnership with Native communities, utilize ICBPR approaches, and integrate Indigenous worldviews, protocols and practices throughout their studies, although, their level of integration of OI, RR, and NeT vary from study to study based on design and community needs.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Exemplars of Culturally Grounded Health Intervention Research
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Yappalli is an innovative study in that it is led by both Choctaw researchers (Walters and Johnson-Jennings) as well as Choctaw community leaders (Stroud) and was developed by and for Choctaw women.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research > OI Exemplar: Yappalli Choctaw Study
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“one of the protective factors that is particularly important, ellangneq (eshl-law-ng’-nek literally, “to wake up”), describes the process of becoming aware of oneself as a human being in connection with others, the animal world, the land, and a spiritual world.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being > RR Exemplar: The Qungasvik (Toolbox) Prevention Approach
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, Yappalli is a ground-breaking study utilizing Choctaw-specific theory based on Choctaw cultural knowledge and ancient teachings.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research > OI Exemplar: Yappalli Choctaw Study
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Qungasvik is a culturally grounded Alaska Native intervention seeking to establish itself as an evidence-based practice.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being > RR Exemplar: The Qungasvik (Toolbox) Prevention Approach
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specifically, a culturally-centered TEK narrative theme of the significance of fire emerged as did the stories relevant to how tribal members have historically served as stewards of fire.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR) > ICBR Exemplar 1: Residential Wood Smoke Intervention
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Native researchers throughout the globe have given other names to the “all our relations” maxim, as Moreton-Robinson (2000) notes, labeling this process as “kindredness” or “connectedness” across time, space, place, and beings.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Moreton-Robinson, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Through the study and interpretations of these teachings, Native communities are given methods, practices, and protocols for how to live and interact in the world (Nelson, 2008).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nelson, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“ICBPR incorporates an approach to research centered in Indigenous community values and epistemologies, including recognition of tribal sovereignty and community rights to self-determination (Wallerstein, Duran, Oetzel, et al., 2018).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR)
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Wallerstein, Duran, Oetzel, et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These place-based approaches are central to promoting connectedness to ancestors’ OI from the past and for those yet to come and awakening the responsibilities of the present generation, community, and family.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research > OI Exemplar: Yappalli Choctaw Study
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, how we think, communicate, and act all carry power as well as intergenerational responsibilities taught through OI.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, naming the hula intervention in the Native tongue of Kānaka Maoli recognizes the [em]bodied relational power of the dance and the intervention to renew vitality and wellbeing and also outlines the key boundaries and cultural responsibilities for the dancers, the research team and the community.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Narrative-[em]Bodied Transformation (NeT): Strengthening Language, Dance, and Talking Story > NeT Exemplar: KaHOLO Project – Renewed Health Through Hula
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For many Indigenous People, IK has sustained their communities and includes a deep belief in the connectedness of all creation across time and space, with relationships between past, present and future entities.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Indigenous Knowledges
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Kumu Hula unanimously sanctioned the use of hula as a health promotion strategy to address chronic diseases, with admonition of the importance of maintaining hula’s traditional practices and protocols.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Narrative-[em]Bodied Transformation (NeT): Strengthening Language, Dance, and Talking Story > NeT Exemplar: KaHOLO Project – Renewed Health Through Hula
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“although some of the IK and OI may have been taken the core thought ways and teachings can still be found.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Original Instructions (OI) are the ancient teachings regarding the protocols, practices, and responsibilities to enact Indigenous Knowledges and are expressed through stories, songs/chants, dances, ceremonies as well as calendrical, spiritual, teaching, clan and governance systems (Nelson, 2008).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nelson, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The development of Ola Hou was undertaken with participation of the kumu hula community and other Native Hawaiian stakeholders.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Narrative-[em]Bodied Transformation (NeT): Strengthening Language, Dance, and Talking Story > NeT Exemplar: KaHOLO Project – Renewed Health Through Hula
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These histories are fraught with historically traumatic genocidal, ethnocidal (i.e., destruction of lifeways), ecocidal (destruction of native lands, waters, and air quality), and epistemicidal events rooted in settler colonialism that generationally have impacted Native sovereignty and wellbeing.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Relationality is reciprocal as well as spatial, given it does not move forward and backward in time, but rather, encompasses all directions simultaneously.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Research is not just a “civilized” quest for knowledge; rather, it involves particular sets of activities that “reproduce social relations of power” (Tuhiwai-Smith, 2005).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Tuhiwai-Smith, 2005 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Choctaw had a complex social and ceremonial life where they upheld the teachings of their ancestors (Chanspo Ikhvnanchi/ OI) through traditional clans/societies, social activities and roles.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research > OI Exemplar: Yappalli Choctaw Study
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For Indigenous Peoples, relationality means that one experiences the self as a part of others, and that others are part of the self–all are inextricably linked (Moreton-Robinson, 2000).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Moreton-Robinson, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, relationships can be central to healing and provide the framework for health interventions.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Too often health interventions, and related research, ignore the impact of this historical trauma and the salience of Indigenous knowledges for achieving wellbeing.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Embedded in IK and enacted through OI are place-based teachings, relational worldviews, and ways of being, knowing, and talking in the world.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The traditional and empirical IK was embedded into the Ola Hou research endeavor to ensure the cultural appropriateness of hula as a health intervention to address CVD, and also, to ensure its cultural and spiritual integrity when applied as a medical intervention.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Narrative-[em]Bodied Transformation (NeT): Strengthening Language, Dance, and Talking Story > NeT Exemplar: KaHOLO Project – Renewed Health Through Hula
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the ways of knowing, doing, and being in the world (Martin et al., 2003) not only give meaning and motivation to collective and individual action but also provide protocols for healthful living.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > We Rise from Colonial Ashes: Growing Health Interventions from our Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Martin et al., 2003 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“few prevention intervention EBIs have been adequately adapted by and for Native communities and thus, are not sufficiently culturally validated (Lucero, 2016).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lucero, 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Simply indigenizing is insufficient if communities are not in control of the indigenizing processes and its goals, as these goals may directly conflict with western practices and epistemologies.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > We Rise from Colonial Ashes: Growing Health Interventions from our Roots
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Smith, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Getting re-connected to the body and the stories that bodies tell is an opportunity to restore relationships not only to the body, but to the histories the body expresses, to the mind and spirit that is integrally connected.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Narrative-[em]Bodied Transformation (NeT): Strengthening Language, Dance, and Talking Story > [Em]Bodied Narratives.
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“because Native agencies tend to be dependent on funders that emphasize using unaltered EBI’s, they are placed in untenable situations where they risk loss of funding if they culturally tailor EBIs (Lucero, 2016) or loss of cultural credibility if they do not.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Lucero, 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For Native Hawaiians/Kānaka Maoli, these series of traumatic events also led to the alienation of Kānaka Maoli from their “beliefs, customs, and sovereignty, which has had significant physical, psychological, and social ramifications…to this day.” (Kaholokula, 2007; p. 280).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Kaholokula, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Qasgiq was originally an intergenerational space providing for the physical, intellectual and spiritual needs of the people.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being > RR Exemplar: The Qungasvik (Toolbox) Prevention Approach
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Moreover, the complexity of living in modern times and in major cities demands that we not only recognize the persistence of Indigenous peoples over 500 years of colonization, but the survivance (Vizenor, 2008) of Indigenous peoples in holding on to deep cultural threads of knowledge and practices that endure to this day (Nelson, 2008).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nelson, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, protocols for living healthfully with the plant and animal world can be found in practices that tribal communities still utilize today.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Alarcón (2008) provides an example of the spatial aspects of relational worldviews among the Maya, who have a fifth direction beyond the cardinal four directions, as captured in their mantra which translates as “you are my other I;” everyone is a mirror of each other, and each is a “unique window to the universe.””
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Relational Restoration (RR): Nurturing Relational Ways of Being
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Alarcón (2008)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Indigenist research recognizes Indigenous knowledges, worldviews, and realities as vital to continued survival and frames research within this perspective (Martin et al., 2003).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > We Rise from Colonial Ashes: Growing Health Interventions from our Roots
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Martin et al., 2003 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Information and motivation synergistically act as tools to develop behavioral skills, which then, ultimately improves health outcomes.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research > OI Exemplar: Yappalli Choctaw Study
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“without acknowledging the underlying deep epistemological and cosmological context that drives health and well-being in the Native community, which differ from Western worldviews, this approach may unknowingly diminish the salience and power of Native cultural practices. It can further reinforce stereotypes, while possibly producing unintended individual and community iatrogenic effects leading to”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
““inadvertent colonization” (West et al, 2012).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites West et al, 2012 source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
In the paper
“It involves honoring Indigenous social norms and processes within their lived context, particularly their social, historical, and political context, and privileging Indigenous voices, lives, and experiences (Smith, 1999).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > We Rise from Colonial Ashes: Growing Health Interventions from our Roots
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Smith, 1999
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indigenous Knowledge (IK) allows communities to thrive and is the basis for decision-making related to health.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Indigenous Knowledges
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indigenous ways of knowing not only imagine a more healthful world for Native people, but for all of humanity.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Yappalli team is committed to conducting indigenist ICBPR processes throughout all phases of the research process and are done in partnership and under the leadership of Choctaw practitioners, community leaders, and researchers.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR) > ICBR Exemplar 3: Yappalli-Choctaw Language and Research Protocols
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The process included interviewing key stakeholders (i.e., teachers, parents, community leaders, and children) in the community regarding needs around substance use.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR) > ICBR Exemplar 2: Intertribal Talking Circle for the Prevention of Substance Abuse
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Tribally based advisory board members also reviewed data collection methods (including air quality monitoring tools and methods), and the development of three short culturally adapted best-burn videos that included local Indigenous narrators, Indigenous language, and historical cultural stories of the role of fire and significance of smoke for ceremonial practices.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR) > ICBR Exemplar 1: Residential Wood Smoke Intervention
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An indigenizing linguistic approach was much deeper than simply translating English words into Choctaw, it involved learning relational aspects of Choctaw words/concepts to wellbeing and healthful behaviors.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR) > ICBR Exemplar 3: Yappalli-Choctaw Language and Research Protocols
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“By incorporating our languages, we are not only “re-indigenizing ourselves,” but also embracing what Nelson (2008) terms “intellectual sovereignty.””
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR) > ICBR Exemplar 3: Yappalli-Choctaw Language and Research Protocols
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Nelson, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“CMCT acknowledges that many tribes have a circular worldview with constant flow and movement, so tailoring happens not only in the planning, but in the implementation of the intervention.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR) > ICBR Exemplar 2: Intertribal Talking Circle for the Prevention of Substance Abuse
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Patchell et al., 2012
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“ICBPR focuses on nurturing mutual respect for cultural protocols and practices in building healthful research partnerships (e.g., development of research protocol codes) with the inclusion of Native scholars, community and cultural leaders, Elders, knowledge keepers, youth (when appropriate), and other important stakeholders throughout all phases of research (Walters et al., 2009).”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR)
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Walters et al., 2009 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These creative alternative possibilities not only can improve science and wellbeing by and for Native communities, but simultaneously improve the science and wellbeing of all communities.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Conclusion
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Though indigenist research processes have been seen as viable and productive in these examples, little research exists on defining successful health interventions and how these may be generalizable to other tribal nations.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It further included identifying specific cultural use of talking circles and their utility within the specific culture and then modifying and implementing the intervention in diverse tribal communities,”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR) > ICBR Exemplar 2: Intertribal Talking Circle for the Prevention of Substance Abuse
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, these projects illustrate the feasibility and process of situating Indigenous health interventions within a research framework guided by original instructions, relational restoration and narrative transformation strategies.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Conclusion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The tribal advisory board was provided screenings of the videos for review.”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Developing Indigenist Community-Based Participatory Research (ICBR) > ICBR Exemplar 1: Residential Wood Smoke Intervention
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
There is limited information on how Native communities and health researchers have successfully collaborated to design culturally based prevention efforts rooted in Indigenous knowledges, protocols, and practices from the ground up.
“However, to date, there is limited information on how Native communities and health researchers have successfully collaborated to design culturally based prevention efforts rooted in Indigenous knowledges, protocols, and practices from the ground up.”
The paper relies on this without support.
When Native health interventions are based on non-Native EBIs, they typically only measure the quantity and frequency of particular cultural practices as the underlying mechanisms for health behavior and change, and they ignore the epistemological foundation that frames Native cultural practices.
“Methodologically, when Native health interventions are based on non-Native EBI’s, they typically only measure the quantity and frequency of particular cultural practices as the underlying mechanisms for health behavior and change. In doing so, they ignore the epistemological foundation that frames Native cultural practices.”
The paper relies on this without support.
EBIs supplemented with decontextualized cultural or practice add-ons continue to operate within the Western-oriented worldview that upholds the EBI.
“Often times EBIs are supplemented with decontextualized cultural or practice add-ons (e.g., replacing English words with tribal language); in doing so, they continue to operate within the Western-oriented worldview that upholds the EBI.”
The paper relies on this without support.
To date, the majority of obesity and substance abuse prevention efforts in Indian Country have primarily ignored Original Instructions and resources that contemporary Native culture can provide.
“To date, the majority of obesity and substance abuse prevention efforts in Indian Country have primarily ignored OI and resources that contemporary Native culture can provide.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Culturally grounded adaptation of EBIs remains difficult because Native entities are often under resourced and lack necessary support to culturally adapt an intervention.
“Culturally grounded adaptation of EBIs remains difficult because Native entities are often under resourced and lack necessary support to culturally adapt an intervention.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Health interventions that include narrative transformation can serve to decolonize internalized and embodied narratives of victimization into narratives of hope and well-being.
“Health interventions that include narrative transformation can serve to decolonize internalized and embodied narratives of victimization into narratives of hope and well-being.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The arts, music, and stories are important vehicles to transmit OI and ways of being in the world.
“The arts, music, and stories are important vehicles to transmit OI and ways of being in the world.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many Native communities are revitalizing their songs, dances, and stories to embrace ancestors’ vision and teachings, decolonize minds and bodies, and transcend histories of colonization and internalized embodied colonizing patterns of thought.
“Many Native communities are revitalizing their songs, dances, and stories to not only embrace their ancestors’ vision and teachings, but going further, to decolonize their minds and their bodies, and to transcend their histories of colonization and the internalization of unchecked embodied colonizing patterns of thought, that despite incredible resilience, may persist.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The body has emerged as a key focus in the social and behavioral sciences and can serve as a site for relational restoration.
“Recently, the body has emerged as a key focus in the social and behavioral sciences and can serve as a site for relational restoration.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Native scholars and scientists have begun to examine how Indigenous dance can be a site for relational restoration and promotion for health and well-being.
“Native scholars and scientists have begun to examine how Indigenous dance can be a site for this relational restoration and promotion for health and well-being.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Hula connects dancers to their bodies and directly connects them to their ancestors; this ancestral thread is activated through ancient chants, rhythms, and stories.
“For example, hula, the traditional Indigenous dance form of Kānaka Maoli not only connects the dancers to their bodies, but also directly connects them to their ancestors. This ancestral thread is activated within their mind, body and spirit through the ancient chants, rhythms, and stories being expressed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Native scholars argue that IK, OI, and relational worldviews are often embedded in stories, songs, dances, and other cultural practices, and utilizing these art-based experiences are increasingly finding their place in Indigenous health research scholarship.
“Native scholars argue that IK, OI, and relational worldviews are often embedded in the stories, songs, dances, and other cultural practices, and utilizing these art-based experiences are increasingly finding their place in Indigenous health research scholarship.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Hula remains a powerful force for expressing ancestral knowledges while promoting relational connectedness, well-being, and cultural grounding.
“Contemporarily, hula remains a powerful force for expressing the ancestral knowledges while also promoting relational connectedness, well-being, and cultural grounding.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The cultural practice of hula is inextricably linked to the words of accompanying chants and songs that convey stories, teachings, history, and deep place-based IK, which provides nurturing relational restoration and OI to dancers and audiences.
“The cultural practice of hula is inextricably linked to the words of the accompanying chants and songs that traditionally convey the stories, teachings, history, and deep place-based IK which, in turn, provides nurturing relational restoration and OI to the dancers and their audiences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a critical need to develop community-based interventions aimed at reduction of environmental contaminant exposures relevant to Native communities.
“There is a critical need to develop community-based interventions aimed at reduction of environmental contaminant exposures relevant to Native communities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Indoor Air Quality exposures can be impacted by residential wood heating, which is often the most economic and culturally preferred form of home heating for many rural Native communities.
“Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) exposures can be impacted by residential wood heating, which is the often the most economic and culturally preferred form of home heating for many rural Native communities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Biomass smoke exposure is associated with respiratory disease in susceptible populations, i.e., young and elder Native populations.
“However, such biomass smoke exposure is associated with respiratory disease in susceptible populations, (i.e., young and elder Native populations).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Very few environmental science interventions have been conducted in collaboration with Indigenous communities.
“To date, very few environmental science interventions have been conducted in collaboration with Indigenous communities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Substance abuse among American Indians is a critical health disparity and accounts for many life threatening and deadly problems such as auto accidents, chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, homicide and suicide.
“Substance abuse among American Indians (AI) is a critical health disparity and accounts for many life threatening and deadly problems such as auto accidents, chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, homicide and suicide.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Linguistic competence is a hallmark of ICBPR, with incorporation of Indigenous languages and their worldviews in instruments, interventions, and dissemination materials in culturally credible and legible ways.
“Moreover, linguistic competence is another hallmark of ICBPR, with incorporation of Indigenous languages, and the worldviews inherent within them, in the instruments, the interventions, and the dissemination materials in culturally credible and legible ways.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Second, they build community connectedness, reducing the isolation that urban-dwelling AI/AN individuals often experience, and creating supportive networks that discourage substance use (Walters et al., 2020).”
From Bridging Traditions and Prevention: Insights into Implementing and Sustaining Substance Use Programs for Urban AI/AN Communities (2026) · cites this paper as Walters et al., 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This connection is reinforced through land-based activities and Indigenous language learning, both of which strengthen cultural identity and health outcomes (McIvor 2013, Walters et al. 2020, Ahmed et al. 2023).”
From An exploration of cultural grounding in Indigenous health promotion: perspectives from First Nations communities in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as Walters et al. 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Culturally responsive health promotion approaches that incorporate traditional practices, peer support, and community engagement may therefore strengthen resilience and psychological well-being among Native American college students [37,38,48].”
From Relationships Between Physical Activity, Sleep, Psychological Well-Being, and Academic Performance Among Native American College Students (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Indigenous perspectives on health similarly emphasize a holistic understanding of wellness that integrates physical, mental, emotional, spiritual, and community dimensions of health [38].”
From Relationships Between Physical Activity, Sleep, Psychological Well-Being, and Academic Performance Among Native American College Students (2026) · cites this paper as [38]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > Original Instructions (OI): Framing Indigenist research
“(Kaholokula, 2007; p. 280)”
§ Growing from Our Roots: Strategies for Developing Culturally Grounded Health-Promotion Interventions in American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Communities > References
“(pp. 180– 195).”
Citations
Cites
8 Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Smith, L. T. (2024) · Multilingual Matters eBooks · doi:10.21832/9781800418868-012 · Cited by 9,766
Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples
Hall, T. D., & Smith, L. T. (2000) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2653993 · Cited by 7,352
Martin-Booran Mirraboopa, K. (2003) · Journal of Australian Studies · doi:10.1080/14443050309387838 · Cited by 1,242
(2008) · University of Nebraska Press eBooks · Cited by 1,033
Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Alaska Native Ways of Knowing
Barnhardt, R., & Kawagley, A. O. (2005) · Anthropology & Education Quarterly · doi:10.1525/aeq.2005.36.1.008 · Cited by 979
The stepped wedge trial design: a systematic review
Brown, C. A., & Lilford, R. J. (2006) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-6-54 · Cited by 907
Castellano, M. B. (2004) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · doi:10.18357/ijih11200412291 · Cited by 446
TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE: THE THIRD ALTERNATIVE (COMMENTARY)
Pierotti, R. J., & Wildcat, D. R. (2000) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1333:tektta]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 439
Walters, K. L., Mohammed, S. A., Evans-Campbell, T., Beltrán, R. E., Chae, D. H., & Duran, B. (2011) · Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race · doi:10.1017/s1742058x1100018x · Cited by 424
Self-citationOriginal instructions: indigenous teachings for a sustainable future
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2753 · Cited by 236
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Alarcón, F. X. (2008). El poder de la palabra/The power of the word: Toward a Nahuatl/Mestizo consciousness. In M. K. Nelson (Ed.), Original instructions: Indigenous teachings for a sustainable future (pp. 265–287). Rochester: Collective Heritage Institute, Bear and Company.
- Grossman, Z. (2014). Decolonizing landscapes: Unlikely alliances grow resilience at the grassroots. Pp. 52–55. In Johnson, J. T., Pualani Louis, R., & Kliskey, A. (Eds.): Weaving Indigenous and sustainability sciences: Diversifying our methods. (WIS2DOM) Workshop. National Science Foundation: Arctic Social Sciences Program.
- Kaholokula, J. K. (2007). Colonialism, acculturation, and depression among Kānaka Maoli of Hawai’i. In P. Culbertson, M. N. Agee, & C. Makasiale (Eds.), Penina Uliuli: Confronting challenges in mental health for Pacific Peoples (pp. 180–195). Honolulu: University of Hawai’I Press.
- Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000). Talkin’ up to the white women. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
- Paikuli-Stride, M., Enos, E., & Minton, N. (2008). Taro roots run deep: Hawaiian restoration of sacred foods and communities. In M. K. Nelson (Ed.), Original instructions: Indigenous teachings for a sustainable future (pp. 304–317). Rochester: Collective Heritage Institute, Bear and Company.
- Patchell, B., Robbins, L., Hoke, M., & Lowe, J. (2012). Circular model of cultural tailoring: An intervention adaption. Journal of Theory Construction and Testing, 16, 45–51.
- Wilson, S. (2001). Research is ceremony. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dickerson, D., Baldwin, J. A., Belcourt, A., Belone, L., Gittelsohn, J., Keawe’aimoku Kaholokula, J., Lowe, J., Patten, C. A., & Wallerstein, N. (2020) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-018-0926-1 · Cited by 151
“Walters et al. (2018) provides a more thorough overview of Indigenous-based theoretical constructs and theories utilized in the development of culturecentered interventions from the ground up (refer to Walters et al. 2018, in this Special Edition Journal).”
Self-citationCulturally responsive approaches to health promotion for Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders
Kaholokula, J. K., Ing, C. T., Look, M. A., Delafield, R., & Sinclair, K. (2018) · Annals of Human Biology · doi:10.1080/03014460.2018.1465593 · Cited by 151
Self-citationWallerstein, N. B. (2021) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12530 · Cited by 116
The Imperative for Research to Promote Health Equity in Indigenous Communities
Stanley, L. R., Swaim, R. C., Kaholokula, J. K., Kelly, K. J., Belcourt, A., & Allen, J. (2017) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-017-0850-9 · Cited by 119
Self-citationHolding no-one back: The Nutrition Equity Framework in theory and practice
Nisbett, N., Harris, J., Backholer, K., Baker, P., Jernigan, V. B. B., & Friel, S. (2021) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100605 · Cited by 95
“, 2009), and addresses the urgent need for nutrition equity approaches that are embedded within an Indigenous concept of health and wellness and self-determination (Walters et al., 2020).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Walters, K. L., Johnson-Jennings, M., Stroud, S., Rasmus, S., Charles, B., John, S., Allen, J., Kaholokula, J. K., Look, M. A., de Silva, M., Lowe, J., Baldwin, J. A., Lawrence, G., Brooks, J., Noonan, C. W., Belcourt, A., Quintana, E., Semmens, E. O., & Boulafentis, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma (US)
- University of Alaska Fairbanks (US)
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Florida State University (US)
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Montana (US)
- Nez Perce Tribal Executive Committee (US)
- Corresponding author
- Walters, Karina L.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Prevention Science
- Published
- 2018-11-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 54-64
- ISSN
- 1389-4986 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-6695
- PMC
- PMC6502697
- OpenAlex
- W2899999114
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 16.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Prevention Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA037176, R01DA035143)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA023754)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL126577)
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES022583, R01ES022649)
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (1P60MD006909)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Keywords
- Indigenous health, community-based participatory research, narrative transformation, indigenous knowledge, community partnerships, evidence-based intervention adaptation
- MeSH terms
- Health Equity, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Indians, North American, Male, United States, Program Development, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, Cultural Competency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-27, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-27 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
