Cited by 91Cancer survivorship and careChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeNursing care and research

How Are Spousal Depressed Mood, Distress, and Quality of Life Associated with Risk of Depressed Mood in Cancer Survivors? Longitudinal Findings from a National Sample

Open access
Litzelman, Kristin, Yabroff, K. Robin·2015·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Spouses of cancer survivors experience both positive and negative effects from caregiving. However, it is less clear what role spousal well-being may have on cancer survivors. This study aimed to determine the impact of spousal psychosocial factors on survivor depressed mood and whether this association differed by gender. Methods: We examined longitudinal data on cancer survivors and their spouses (n = 910 dyads) from the 2004–2012 Medical Expenditures Panel Survey and a matched sample of cancer-free dyads. Subjects reported depressed mood, psychologic distress, and mental and physical health-related quality of life (HRQoL) at two time points (T1/T2). Dyadic multilevel models evaluated the impact of psychosocial factors at T1 on depressed mood at T2, controlling for sociodemographics, cancer type, survivor treatment status, and depressed mood at T1. Results: Cancer survivors whose spouses reported depressed mood at T1 were 4.27 times more likely to report depressed mood at T2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.01–9.07]; this was stronger for female survivors (OR, 9.49; 95% CI, 2.42–37.20). Better spousal mental and physical HRQoL at T1 were associated with a 30% decrease in survivor depressed mood risk at T2. Most spillover effects were not observed in comparison dyads. Conclusion: Depressed mood and poor HRQoL in spouses may increase the risk of depressed mood in cancer survivors. The risk may be especially strong for female survivors. Impact: Identifying and improving spousal mental health and HRQoL problems may reduce the risk of depressed mood in cancer survivors. Future research should examine whether incorporating spousal care into psychooncology and survivorship programs improves survivor outcomes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(6); 969–77. ©2015 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-1420

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [63]DiMatteo MR Lepper HS Croghan TW Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment - Meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence Archives of internal medicine 2000 160 2101 7 10904452

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Litzelman, K., & Yabroff, K. R.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Litzelman, Kristin
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2015-05-31
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
969-977
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2124822885
Cited by
91
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
cancer survivors, health-related quality of life, spillover effects, gender differences, dyadic analysis, psycho-oncology, survivorship care
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Prognosis, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Survival Rate, Survivors, Spouses, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review