Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

University-linked programmes for sustainable entrepreneurship and regional development: how and with what impact?

Wagner, Marcus, Schaltegger, Stefan, Hansen, Erik G., Fichter, Klaus·2021·Small Business Economics
DOI 10.1007/s11187-019-00280-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

State universities are increasingly being transformed from institutions with traditional teaching and research responsibilities to have a third, societal role in sustainable regional and economic development. In doing so, universities support knowledge spillovers to improve sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems that benefit economic revitalization or further development of regions. At the same time they promote stakeholder involvement in crucial governance processes at the regional level. Based on a comparative case study design building on three cases in Germany, our research analyses these interdependencies focussing on university-linked support programmes for sustainable entrepreneurship and the effects on sustainable regional development. Our findings provide a nuanced view clarifying the different roles universities have, how knowledge spillovers are created, and what outputs, outcomes, and effects are realized at the regional level and beyond. Specifically, we demonstrate that depending on the regional context, different configurations, pathways, and intervention points of universities may equally improve sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11187-019-00280-4

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Anon. (2011). Umwelt-Technologie und Energie in Bayern. Munich: media mind GmbH.
  2. Fichter, K., Geier, J., & Tiemann, I. (2016). Good practice collection – university support for sustainable entrepreneurship. Berlin, Helsinki, Linköping: SHIFT.
  3. Geier, J., & Fichter, K. (2015). Good practice examples: activities in sustainable entrepreneurship at universities in Finland, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. Berlin, Helsinki, Linköping: SHIFT.
  4. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.
  5. OECD. (2002). Glossary of key terms in evaluations and results based management. Paris: OECD.
  6. Tiemann, I., & Fichter, K. (2016). Developing business models with the sustainable business canvas: manual for conducting workshops. Oldenburg: University of Oldenburg Retrieved from www.borderstep.de. Accessed 27 August 2019.
  7. Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed). Applied social research methods series (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Wagner, M., Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E. G., & Fichter, K.
Venue
Small Business Economics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-11-11
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
1141-1158
ISSN
  • 0921-898X
  • 1573-0913
DOI
10.1007/s11187-019-00280-4
Cited by
160
References
60
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Johannes Kepler University Linz

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.