Cited by 189Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Thin is in? Think again: the rising importance of muscularity in the thin ideal female body

Bozsik, Frances, Whisenhunt, Brooke L., Hudson, Danae L., Bennett, Brooke, Lundgren, Jennifer D.·2018·Sex Roles

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11199-017-0886-0

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bozsik, F., Whisenhunt, B. L., Hudson, D. L., Bennett, B., & Lundgren, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
  • Missouri State University (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Bozsik, Frances
Venue
Sex Roles
Published
2018-01-25
Volume
79
Issue
9-10
Pages
609-615
ISSN
  • 0360-0025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2762
OpenAlex
W2788726603
Cited by
189
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 2
FWCI
20.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sex Roles (publishedVersion)
  • BearWorks (Missouri State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
muscularity, thin ideal, ideal female body, body image, media representation of women, attractiveness, fitness, compulsive exercise, media literacy, body dissatisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review