Comparing the effectiveness of multiple text reading and rereading on knowledge retention and metacognitive accuracy
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Although learning approaches are designed to enhance individuals' ability to store and retrieve information, not all of them are considered effective. The goal of the present study was to experimentally compare the test performance as well as the accuracy of metacognitive judgements of a multiple text reading group, rereading group, and single reading group in a one-day vs. one-week delayed test (3 × 2 between subject design). A total of 186 psychology students ( M age = 20.76) participated in the experiment focused on reading comprehension, accuracy of metacognitive judgments and knowledge retention. Results of the knowledge test indicate that in the one-day delayed test, multiple text reading and rereading yield similar results: both deliver slightly better results than single reading. In the one-week delayed test, though, multiple text reading yields better results than rereading, and both these reading approaches outperform single reading. Moreover, multiple text reading results in fairly robust knowledge retention with only a slight decrease in scores between the one-day delayed and one-week delayed test. Regarding metacognitive monitoring, judgements of learning in the multiple text reading group remained relatively stable after each reading and participants were underconfident about their knowledge. In the rereading group, judgements of learning increased after each reading and participants were overconfident about their knowledge, especially on the one-day delayed test. These findings have implications for educational practices aimed at enhancing learning outcomes and promoting effective learning.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,706 · see citing works
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Each of the texts explained the principles of the dual process theory, heuristics in general, and anchoring heuristic and confirmation bias (theories and constructs proposed by Evans, 2003; Kahneman, 2011; Stanovich, 2004; Tversky & Kahneman, 1974; Wason, 1960).”
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,268 · see citing works
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · see citing works
Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists
Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806384 · Cited by 10,674 · see citing works
(1998) · Cited by 4,875 · see citing works
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028085 · Cited by 3,865 · see citing works
Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An Overview
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2 · Cited by 3,687 · see citing works
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138 · see citing works
A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research
Panadero, E. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422 · Cited by 2,915 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While SRL broadly encompasses motivational, cognitive, and metacognitive aspects of learning (see Panadero, 2017; Schraw et al., 2006), the present study focuses on the cognitive aspect of SRL, mainly multiple text reading and rereading, along with their impact on metacognitive judgments (judgments…”
mirt : A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R Environment
Chalmers, R. P. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i06 · Cited by 2,715 · see citing works
In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012 · Cited by 2,252 · see citing works
On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task
Wason, P. C. (1960) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470216008416717 · Cited by 2,090 · see citing works
Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8 · Cited by 1,529 · see citing works
Self-Regulated Learning: Beliefs, Techniques, and Illusions
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823 · Cited by 1,468 · see citing works
Monitoring one’s own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning
Koriat, A. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349 · Cited by 1,363 · see citing works
Memory and Metamemory Considerations in the Training of Human Beings
Bjork, R. A. (1994) · Metacognition · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4561.003.0011 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
Rowland, C. A. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037559 · Cited by 1,066 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Nevertheless, we were concerned about the potential influence of the testing effect (Dunlosky et al., 2013; Rowland, 2014) on the observed differences between our experimental groups, basically that it potentially can mask the true effect of the reading approaches we sought to investigate.”
How can primary school students learn self-regulated learning strategies most effectively?
Dignath, C., Buettner, G., & Langfeldt, H.-P. (2008) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.02.003 · Cited by 903 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Therefore, it allows for reflection of one’s learning process and has an impact on decisions about the use and regulation of learning activities and techniques (Bjørk et al., 2013; Dignath et al., 2008; Dunlosky & Lipko, 2007; Schraw et al., 2006).”
InfluentialAccuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts.
Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. J. (2003) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2009) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658210802647009 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Text comprehension, memory, and learning.
Kintsch, W. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.4.294 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
The Interaction of Domain-Specific and Strategic Knowledge in Academic Performance
Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058004375 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
(2011) · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Dunlosky, J. T., & Rawson, K. A. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.08.003 · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information
Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2004_2 · Cited by 509 · see citing works
Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying.
Butler, A. C. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0019902 · Cited by 492 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…a direct comparison with active learning techniques (such as elaborative interrogation, practice testing, or self-explanation) rereading led to worse results in the long-term perspective (e.g., Bjørk et al., 2013; Butler, 2010; Dunlosky et al., 2013; McDaniel et al., 2012; Weinstein et al., 2010).”
A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring
Schraw, G. J. (2008) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement?
Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y · Cited by 477 · see citing works
Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.301 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Sentence memory: A theoretical analysis
Kintsch, W., Welsch, D. M., Schmalhofer, F., & Zimny, S. T. (1990) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(90)90069-c · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions.
Rhodes, M. G., & Castel, A. D. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0013684 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
Education at a Glance 2016: OECD Indicators
OECD (2016) · Education at a Glance · doi:10.1787/eag-2016-en · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice
Metcalfe, J., & Finn, B. (2008) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.15.1.174 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Stanovich, K. E. (2004) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226771199.001.0001 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Metacognitive Judgments and Control of Study
Metcalfe, J. (2009) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x · Cited by 374 · see citing works
Illusions of Competence in Monitoring One's Knowledge During Study.
Koriat, A., & Bjork, R. A. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.187 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Dunlosky, J. T., & Lipko, A. R. (2007) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00509.x · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Rouet, J.-F. (2006) · doi:10.4324/9780203820094 · Cited by 337 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, learners often find multiple text reading more challenging (Rouet, 2006) due to the need to integrate information from various sources.”
Relevance Processes in Multiple Document Comprehension
Rouet, J., & Britt, M. A. (2011) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-61735-531-820251003 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Teaching high school students to use heuristics while reading historical texts.
Nokes, J. D., Dole, J. A., & Hacker, D. J. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.492 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Dunlosky, J. T., & Thiede, K. W. (2012) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.05.002 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study During Multitrial Learning
Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J. T., Graf, A., & Narens, L. (1994) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x · Cited by 216 · see citing works
The Effect of Knowledge and Strategy Training on Monitoring Accuracy
Nietfeld, J. L., & Schraw, G. J. (2002) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220670209596583 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Comprehension of Multiple Documents With Conflicting Information: A Two-Step Model of Validation
Richter, T., & Abendroth, J. (2017) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2017.1322968 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Poor Metacomprehension Accuracy as a Result of Inappropriate Cue Use
Thiede, K. W., Griffin, T. D., Wiley, J., & Anderson, M. C. M. (2010) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638530902959927 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Learning with Multiple Documents
Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139048224.017 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
The Limited Benefits of Rereading Educational Texts.
Callender, A., & McDaniel, M. (2009) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.07.001 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
McDaniel, M. A., Wildman, K. M., & Anderson, J. L. (2012) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2011.10.001 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Promoting Integration of Multiple Texts: a Review of Instructional Approaches and Practices
Barzilai, S., Zohar, A. R., & Mor-Hagani, S. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9436-8 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Toward a theory of documents representation.
Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J., & Britt, M. A. (1999) · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Radvansky, G. A., Zwaan, R. A., Curiel, J. M., & Copeland, D. E. (2001) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.145 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
The rereading effect: Metacomprehension accuracy improves across reading trials
Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J. T., & Thiede, K. W. (2000) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03209348 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Putting the Comprehension in Metacomprehension
Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., & Thiede, K. W. (2005) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.3200/genp.132.4.408-428 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Rereading Effects Depend on Time of Test.
Rawson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (2005) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.1.70 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-Regulated Learning and the Allocation of Study Time
Dunlosky, J. T., & Ariel, R. (2011) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385527-5.00004-8 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Spontaneous Sourcing Among Students Reading Multiple Documents
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., Britt, M. A., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1080/07370008.2013.769994 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
The role of epistemic perspectives in comprehension of multiple author viewpoints
Barzilai, S., & Eshet‐Alkalai, Y. (2015) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.12.003 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Koriat, A. (2008) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.36.2.416 · Cited by 143 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Fluency, for instance, is a cue which during the learning process creates a sense of familiarity and evokes a subjective feeling that since the learning went smoothly, the material must be easy to remember (Koriat, 2008; Miele et al., 2011; Oppenheimer, 2008).”
Content Integration and Source Separation in Learning From Multiple Texts
(1999) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410603135-16 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Measuring strategic processing when students read multiple texts
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2011) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9075-7 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Improving students’ self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials
Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2007) · The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440701326022 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Dropouts on the web: Effects of interest and burden experienced during an online survey
Galešić, M. (2007) · Quality Engineering · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Gagne, D. D., Morrow, D. G., & DeWall, B. H. (2004) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03195860 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Does Easily Learned Mean Easily Remembered?
Miele, D. B., Finn, B., & Molden, D. C. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610397954 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Massed versus distributed repeated reading: A case of forgetting helping recall?
Krug, D., Davis, T. B., & Glover, J. A. (1990) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.366 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Ferguson, L. E., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2013) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.001 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Weinstein, Y., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L., III (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/a0020992 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Resource allocation during the rereading of scientific texts
Millis, K., Simon, S., & Tenbroek, N. S. (1998) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03201136 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Influence of paraphrased repetitions on the spacing effect.
Glover, J. A., & Corkill, A. J. (1987) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.2.198 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
When further learning fails: Stability and change following repeated presentation of text
Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., Bjork, R. A., Gelman, R., & Wickens, T. D. (2000) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712600161952 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Dunlosky, J. T. (2005) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4001_2 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Fisher, J. S., & Radvansky, G. A. (2018) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.008 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Winne, P. H. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.25091-5 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
College Students' Choices of Study Strategies
Carrier, L. M. (2003) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.2003.96.1.54 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Measuring Multiple Text Integration: A Review
Primor, L., & Katzir, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02294 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Content integration across multiple documents reduces memory for sources
Braasch, J. L. G., McCabe, R. M., & Daniel, F. K. (2016) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-015-9609-5 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Exploring Students’ Use of a Mobile Application to Support Their Self-Regulated Learning Processes
Baars, M., Khare, S., & Ridderstap, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.793002 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Multiple Document Comprehension
Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J. (2020) · Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.867 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Castells, N., Minguela, M., Solé, I., Miras, M., Nadal, E., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2021) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.451 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Reading Multiple and Non-Traditional Texts
Bråten, I., Braasch, J. L. G., & Salmerón, L. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315676302-5 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
How do students integrate multiple texts? An investigation of top-down processing
List, A., Du, H., & Lee, H. Y. (2021) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-020-00497-y · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Higher Order Thinking in Comprehension
McNamara, D. S., Jacovina, M. E., & Allen, L. K. (2015) · doi:10.4324/9780203075562.ch13 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Examining students’ help-seeking when learning from multiple texts
Lee, H. Y., & List, A. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102232 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 86 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Urban, M., Brom, C., Lukavský, J., Děchtěrenko, F., Hein, V., Svacha, F., Kmoníčková, P., & Urban, K. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13591 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationSeban, P., Šikl, R., & Urban, K. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102578 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationSeban, P., Šikl, R., & Urban, K. (2025) · Education Inquiry · doi:10.1080/20004508.2025.2522529 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationXu, Y., Liang, M., Jin, Y., Wang, L., Gao, W., & Tao, T. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1576247
Schuster, C., Waldeyer, J., & Stadtler, M. (2026) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-026-09493-x
- Authors
- Seban, P., Urban, K., & Sikl, R.
- Affiliations
- Czech Academy of Sciences (CZ)
- Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
- Corresponding author
- Seban, Peter
- Venue
- Instructional Science
- Published
- 2024-11-12
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 337-364
- ISSN
- 0020-4277 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1952
- OpenAlex
- W4404233578
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 86
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Instructional Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV (VEGA 2/0026/21)
- University of SS. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- re-reading, knowledge retention, metacognitive accuracy, judgments of learning, metacognitive monitoring, overconfidence, underconfidence, reading comprehension, delayed recall, learning strategies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
