Saving land to feed a growing population: consequences for consumption of crop and livestock products
Open accessAbstract
The expected increase in demand for food raises concerns about the expansion of agricultural land worldwide. To avoid expansion, we need to focus on increasing land productivity, reducing waste, and shifting human diets. Studies exploring diet shifts so far have ignored competition for land between humans and animals. Our objective was to study the relation between land use, the share of animal protein in the human diet, population size, and land availability and quality. We used linear programming to determine minimum land required to feed a population a diet with 0–80 % of the protein derived from terrestrial domestic animals. Populations ranged from 15 million to the maximum number of people that could be supported by the system. The agricultural system in the Netherlands was used as illustration, assuming no import and export of feed and food. Daily energy and protein requirements of humans were fulfilled by a diet potentially consisting of grain (wheat), root and tuber crops (potato, sugar beet), oil crops (rapeseed), legumes (brown bean), and animal protein from ruminants (milk and meat) and monogastrics (pork). Land is used most efficiently if people would derive 12 % of dietary protein from animals (% PA), especially milk. The role of animals in such a diet is to convert co-products from crop production and the human food industry into protein-rich milk and meat. Below 12 % PA, human-inedible products were wasted (i.e., not used for food production), whereas above 12 % PA, additional crops had to be cultivated to feed livestock. Large populations (40 million or more) could be sustained only if animal protein was consumed. This results from the fact that at high population sizes, land unsuitable for crop production was necessary to meet dietary requirements of the population, and contributed to food production by providing animal protein without competing for land with crops. A land use optimization model including crop and animal production enables identification of the optimal % PA in the diet. Land use per capita was lowest at 12 % PA. At this level, animals optimally consume co-products from food production. Larger populations, furthermore, can be sustained only with diets relatively high in % PA, as land unsuitable for crop production is needed to fulfil their food demand. The optimal % PA in the human diet depended on population size and the relative share of land unsuitable for crop production.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Marginal lands (pastures) can be used for dairy production.
“Marginal lands (pastures) can be used for diary production”
From Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Van Kernebeek et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943 · see citing works
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665 · see citing works
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476 · see citing works
Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1116437108 · Cited by 7,692 · see citing works
World development report, 2008: agriculture for development
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-4765 · Cited by 3,462 · see citing works
(2011) · FAO eBooks · Cited by 3,368 · see citing works
World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revisionPreprint
Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.288998 · Cited by 3,155 · see citing works
(2013) · Cited by 2,540 · see citing works
The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste
Papargyropoulou, E., Lozano, R., K. Steinberger, J., Wright, N., & Ujang, Z. B. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.020 · Cited by 1,711 · see citing works
van Gelder, H. A. E. (1961) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-9562-1_10 · Cited by 1,657 · see citing works
Yield gap analysis with local to global relevance—A review
van Ittersum, M. K., Cassman, K. G., Grassini, P., Wolf, J., Tittonell, P., & Hochman, Z. (2013) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.009 · Cited by 1,652 · see citing works
Self-citationGlobal food losses and food waste
Gustavsson, J. (2011) · Cited by 1,561 · see citing works
Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments
de Vries, M., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2009) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2009.11.007 · Cited by 1,237 · see citing works
Bank, W. (2007) · doi:10.1596/978-0-8213-6807-7 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Land-Use Choices: Balancing Human Needs and Ecosystem Function
DeFries, R., Foley, J. A., & Asner, G. P. (2004) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0249:lcbhna]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 929 · see citing works
Reaping the Benefits: Science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture
Davies, B., Baulcombe, D. C., Crute, I. R., Dunwell, J. M., Gale, M., Jones, J., Pretty, J., Sutherland, W. J., & Toulmin, C. (2009) · Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) · Cited by 888 · see citing works
Pielke, R. A., Marland, G. H., Betts, R., Chase, T. N., Eastman, J. L., Niles, J. O., Niyogi, D., & Running, S. W. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2002.1027 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Climate benefits of changing diet
Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., van Vuuren, D. P., den Elzen, M. G. J., Eickhout, B., & Kabat, P. (2009) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9534-6 · Cited by 815 · see citing works
Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for protein
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, N. A. A. (. (2012) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2557 · Cited by 739 · see citing works
Environmental impact of dietary change: a systematic review
Hallström, E., Carlsson‐Kanyama, A., & Börjesson, P. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.008 · Cited by 724 · see citing works
Ramankutty, N., Foley, J. A., Norman, J. M., & McSweeney, K. (2002) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2002.00294.x · Cited by 649 · see citing works
Smith, P., Gregory, P. J., van Vuuren, D., Obersteiner, M., Havlík, P., Rounsevell, M., Woods, J., Stehfest, E., & Bellarby, J. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0127 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Wirsenius, S., Azar, C., & Berndes, G. (2010) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.005 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Use of agro-climatic zones to upscale simulated crop yield potential
Wart, J. V., van Bussel, L. G. J., Wolf, J., Licker, R., Grassini, P., Nelson, A., Boogaard, H., Gerber, J., Mueller, N. D., Claessens, L., et al. (2013) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.023 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Global food supply: land use efficiency of livestock systems
van Zanten, H. H. E., Mollenhorst, H., Klootwijk, C. W., van Middelaar, C. E., & de Boer, I. J. M. (2015) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0944-1 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Environmental Impacts of Dietary Recommendations and Dietary Styles: Germany As an Example
Meier, T., & Christen, O. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302152v · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Suttie, J. M., Reynolds, S. G., & Batello, C. (2005) · Cited by 190 · see citing works
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-6857 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Vellinga, T. V., Blonk, H., Marinussen, M. P. J. C., van Zeist, W. J., & Starmans, D. A. J. (2013) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Mogelijkheden voor koolstofvastlegging in de Nederlandse landbouw en natuur
Lesschen, J. P., Heesmans, H. I. M., Mol-Dijkstra, J. P., et al. (2012) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Can the UN Convention to Combat Desertification guide sustainable use of the world's soils?
Stringer, L. C. (2007) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/070060 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Kwantitatieve Informatie Akkerbouw en Vollegrondsgroenteteelt 2009
Schreuder, R., & Hendriks-Goossens, V. J. C. (2010) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Climate benefits of changing diet
Stehfest, E., Bouwman, L., van Vuuren, D. P., et al. (2009) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1307/6/26/262009 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Page, T. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 30 · see citing works
CVB Veevoedertabel 2016 : chemische samenstellingen en nutritionele waarden van voedermiddelen
Blok, M. C., & Spek, J. W. (2016) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Remmelink, G. J., van Dooren, H. J. C., Middelkoop, J. C. C.-V., et al. (2016) · doi:10.18174/391823 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Description and user guide of GOAL-QUASI: an IMGLP model for the exploration of future land use.
van Ittersum, M. K., Hijmans, R. J., & Scheele, D. (1995) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Voedselvoorziening in Nederland onder buitengewone crisisomstandigheden
Terluin, I. J., Kamphuis, B. M., Oudendag, D. A., et al. (2013) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Optimum crude protein levels for growing and finishing pigs in a tropical environment
Devendra, C., & Parris, E. C. C. (1970) · Tropical Animal Health and Production · doi:10.1007/bf02359684 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Nadere beschouwing van stalbalansen en gasvormige stikstofverliezen uit de intensieve veehouderij
Groenestein, C. M., van Bruggen, C., Hoeksma, P., et al. (2008) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Trends in de fosfaattoestand van landbouwgronden in Nederland in de periode 1998-2003
Schoumans, O. F. (2007) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Dijkstra J (2014) Personal communication. Animal Sciences. Wageningen University, Wageningen EFSA (2009) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Dietetic products, Nutrition and Allergies on a request from European Commission on the review of labelling reference intake values for selected nutri- tional elements. EFSA Journal 1008:1-14
- Van Zanten HHE, Mollenhorst H, Klootwijk CW, Van Middelaar CE, De Boer IJM (2015) Global food security: land use efficiency of live- stock systems. Int J of Life Cycle Assess (in press)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Future Protein Supply and Demand: Strategies and Factors Influencing a Sustainable Equilibrium
Henchion, M., Hayes, M., Mullen, A., Fenelon, M., & Tiwari, B. (2017) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods6070053 · Cited by 1,519 · see citing works
Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption
Van Zanten, H. H. E., Herrero, M., Van Hal, O., Röös, E., Muller, A., Garnett, T., Gerber, P. J., Schader, C., & De Boer, I. J. M. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14321 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Environmental impacts of food consumption and nutrition: Where are we and what is next?
Nemecek, T., Jungbluth, N., i Canals, L. M., & Schenck, R. (2016) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1071-3 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Decoupling livestock from land use through industrial feed production pathways
Pikaar, I., Matassa, S., Bodirsky, B. L., Weindl, I., Humpenöder, F., Rabaey, K., Boon, N., Bruschi, M., Yuan, Z., van Zanten, H., et al. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b00216 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review
Csikós, N., & Tóth, G. (2023) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103560 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Padró, R., Tello, E., Marco, I., Olarieta, J. R., Grasa, M. M., & Font, C. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124043 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Van Kernebeek, H. R. J., Oosting, S. J., Van Ittersum, M. K., Bikker, P., & De Boer, I. J. M.
- Affiliations
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Venue
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
- Published
- 2015-07-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 677-687
- ISSN
- 0948-3349 (ISSN-L)
- 1614-7502
- OpenAlex
- W879194808
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 10.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Royal Society
- Wageningen University and Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
- Keywords
- land use, animal husbandry, food demand, population growth, land productivity, dietary change, land use optimization, food waste, land availability, Dutch agriculture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
