Cited by 13Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesFrailty in Older AdultsChronic Disease Management Strategies

Development and validation of the Life Expectancy Estimator for Older Adults with Diabetes (LEAD): the diabetes and aging study

Open access
Karter, Andrew J., Parker, Melissa M., Moffet, Howard H., Lipska, Kasia J., Laiteerapong, Neda, Grant, Richard W., Lee, Catherine, Huang, Elbert S.·2023·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background Estimated life expectancy for older patients with diabetes informs decisions about treatment goals, cancer screening, long-term and advanced care, and inclusion in clinical trials. Easily implementable, evidence-based, diabetes-specific approaches for identifying patients with limited life expectancy are needed. Objective Develop and validate an electronic health record (EHR)-based tool to identify older adults with diabetes who have limited life expectancy. Design Predictive modeling based on survival analysis using Cox-Gompertz models in a retrospective cohort. Participants Adults with diabetes aged ≥ 65 years from Kaiser Permanente Northern California: a 2015 cohort (N = 121,396) with follow-up through 12/31/2019, randomly split into training (N = 97,085) and test (N = 24,311) sets. Validation was conducted in the test set and two temporally distinct cohorts: a 2010 cohort (n = 89,563; 10-year follow-up through 2019) and a 2019 cohort (n = 152,357; 2-year follow-up through 2020). Main measures Demographics, diagnoses, utilization and procedures, medications, behaviors and vital signs; mortality. Key results In the training set (mean age 75 years; 49% women; 48% racial and ethnic minorities), 23% died during 5 years follow-up. A mortality prediction model was developed using 94 candidate variables, distilled into a life expectancy model with 11 input variables, and transformed into a risk-scoring tool, the Life Expectancy Estimator for Older Adults with Diabetes (LEAD). LEAD discriminated well in the test set (C-statistic = 0.78), 2010 cohort (C-statistic = 0.74), and 2019 cohort (C-statistic = 0.81); comparisons of observed and predicted survival curves indicated good calibration. Conclusions LEAD estimates life expectancy in older adults with diabetes based on only 11 patient characteristics widely available in most EHRs and claims data. LEAD is simple and has potential application for shared decision-making, clinical trial inclusion, and resource allocation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11606-023-08219-y

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Life Expectancy Estimator for Older Adults with Diabetes (LEAD) tool was developed and validated among older adults with diabetes, and a high risk score was strongly associated with having a life expectancy of <5 years.

    “Notably, the Life Expectancy Estimator for Older Adults with Diabetes (LEAD) tool was developed and validated among older adults with diabetes, and a high risk score was strongly associated with having a life expectancy of <5 years (52).”
  • These data may be a useful starting point to inform decisions about selecting less stringent glycemic goals.

    “These data may be a useful starting point to inform decisions about selecting less stringent glycemic goals (56,57).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

  • The LEAD tool was developed and validated among older adults with diabetes, and a high risk score was strongly associated with having a life expectancy of <5 years.

    “Notably, the Life Expectancy Estimator for Older Adults with Diabetes (LEAD) tool was developed and validated among older adults with diabetes, and a high risk score was strongly associated with having a life expectancy of <5 years (56).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

  • The Life Expectancy Estimator for Older Adults with Diabetes (LEAD) tool was developed and validated among older adults with diabetes.

    “The Life Expectancy Estimator for Older Adults with Diabetes (LEAD) tool was developed and validated among older adults with diabetes, and a high risk score was strongly associated with having a life expectancy of <5 years (62).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [62]

  • A high risk score on the LEAD tool was strongly associated with having a life expectancy of <5 years.

    “The Life Expectancy Estimator for Older Adults with Diabetes (LEAD) tool was developed and validated among older adults with diabetes, and a high risk score was strongly associated with having a life expectancy of <5 years (62).”

    From 13. Older Adults: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [62]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. [2]Huang ES, Basu A, O’Grady M, Capretta JC. Projecting the future diabetes population size and related costs for the U.S. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(12):2225–9. PMC2782981 19940225
  2. [4]Laiteerapong N, Huang E. Diabetes in Older Adults. In: Cowie C, Casagrande S, Menke A, et al., eds. Diabetes in America. 3rd ed. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2017:16.1-.26.
  3. [5]Brown SE, Meltzer DO, Chin MH, Huang ES. Perceptions of quality-of-life effects of treatments for diabetes mellitus in vulnerable and nonvulnerable older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(7):1183-90. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01757.x PMC2614394 18492034 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [6]Kirkman MS, Briscoe VJ, Clark N, Florez H, Haas LB, Halter JB, et al. Diabetes in older adults. Diabetes Care. 2012. 10.2337/dc12-1801 PMC3507610 23100048 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [7]LeRoith D Biessels GJ Braithwaite SS Casanueva FF Draznin B Halter JB Treatment of Diabetes in Older Adults: An Endocrine Society* Clinical Practice Guideline J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019 104 5 1520 1574 10.1210/jc.2019-00198 30903688 PMC7271968 · DOI
  6. [8]Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, Kansagara D, Horwitch C, Barry MJ, Forciea MA. Hemoglobin A1c Targets for Glycemic Control With Pharmacologic Therapy for Nonpregnant Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Guidance Statement Update From the American College of Physicians. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2018. 10.7326/M17-0939 29507945 · DOI
  7. [9]Pogach L Tseng CL Soroka O Maney M Aron D A Proposal for an Out-of-Range Glycemic Population Health Safety Measure for Older Adults With Diabetes Diabetes Care 2017 40 4 518 525 10.2337/dc16-0953 28325799 PMC5360287 · DOI
  8. [10]Bloomgarden ZT Einhorn D Handelsman Y Is HbA1c <7% a Marker of Poor Performance in Individuals >65 Years Old? Diabetes Care 2017 40 4 526 528 10.2337/dci16-0043 28325800 · DOI
  9. [12]Lee SJ. So Much Insulin, So Much Hypoglycemia. JAMA Intern Med. 2014. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.13307 PMC4067162 24614940 · DOI
  10. [13]Lee SJ Leipzig RM Walter LC Incorporating lag time to benefit into prevention decisions for older adults JAMA 2013 310 24 2609 2610 10.1001/jama.2013.282612 24322396 PMC4049260 · DOI
  11. [14]O’Hanlon CE Cooper JM Lee SM John P Churpek M Chin MH Life Expectancy Predictions for Older Diabetic Patients as Estimated by Physicians and a Prognostic Model MDM Policy Pract 2017 2 1 2381468317713718 30288423 PMC6124930
  12. [15]Christakis NA Lamont EB Extent and determinants of error in doctors’ prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study BMJ 2000 320 7233 469 472 10.1136/bmj.320.7233.469 10678857 PMC27288 · DOI
  13. [16]Hwang C. Calculated decisions: Ottawa Knee Rule. Emerg Med Pract. 2020;22(Suppl 8):CD11-CD2. 32805102
  14. [17]Keogh C Wallace E O’Brien KK Galvin R Smith SM Lewis C Developing an international register of clinical prediction rules for use in primary care: a descriptive analysis Ann Fam Med 2014 12 4 359 366 10.1370/afm.1640 25024245 PMC4096474 · DOI
  15. [19]Lee SJ Boscardin WJ Kirby KA Covinsky KE Individualizing life expectancy estimates for older adults using the Gompertz Law of Human Mortality PLoS ONE 2014 9 9 e108540 10.1371/journal.pone.0108540 25265291 PMC4180452 · DOI
  16. [20]Lee SJ Lindquist K Segal MR Covinsky KE Development and validation of a prognostic index for 4-year mortality in older adults JAMA 2006 295 7 801 808 10.1001/jama.295.7.801 16478903 · DOI · Paper page
  17. [21]Lee AK Jing B Jeon SY Boscardin WJ Lee SJ Predicting Life Expectancy to Target Cancer Screening Using Electronic Health Record Clinical Data J Gen Intern Med 2022 37 3 499 506 10.1007/s11606-021-07018-7 34327653 PMC8858374 · DOI
  18. [22]Gagne JJ Glynn RJ Avorn J Levin R Schneeweiss S A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 7 749 759 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.10.004 21208778 PMC3100405 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [23]Carey EC Covinsky KE Lui LY Eng C Sands LP Walter LC Prediction of mortality in community-living frail elderly people with long-term care needs J Am Geriatr Soc 2008 56 1 68 75 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01496.x 18031487 · DOI
  20. [25]Chang YK Huang LF Shin SJ Lin KD Chong K Yen FS A Point-based Mortality Prediction System for Older Adults with Diabetes Sci Rep 2017 7 1 12652 10.1038/s41598-017-12751-3 28978911 PMC5627261 · DOI
  21. [26]Griffith KN Prentice JC Mohr DC Conlin PR Predicting 5- and 10-Year Mortality Risk in Older Adults With Diabetes Diabetes Care 2020 43 8 1724 1731 10.2337/dc19-1870 32669409 PMC7372062 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [28]Liu CS, Li CI, Wang MC, Yang SY, Li TC, Lin CC. Building clinical risk score systems for predicting the all-cause and expanded cardiovascular-specific mortality of patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021;23(2):467-479. 10.1111/dom.14240 33118688 · DOI
  23. [29]Wan EYF Fong DYT Fung CSC Yu EYT Chin WY Chan AKC Prediction of five-year all-cause mortality in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus - A population-based retrospective cohort study J Diabetes Complications 2017 31 6 939 944 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.01.017 28238555 · DOI
  24. [30]Goldstein NE Morrison RS The intersection between geriatrics and palliative care: a call for a new research agenda J Am Geriatr Soc 2005 53 9 1593 1598 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53454.x 16137293 · DOI
  25. [31]Collins GS Reitsma JB Altman DG Moons KG Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement Br J Surg 2015 102 3 148 158 10.1002/bjs.9736 25627261 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [32]Moffet HH Adler N Schillinger D Ahmed AT Laraia B Selby JV Cohort Profile: The Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE)–objectives and design of a survey follow-up study of social health disparities in a managed care population Int J Epidemiol 2009 38 1 38 47 10.1093/ije/dyn040 18326513 PMC2635421 · DOI
  27. [33]Ali MK Bullard KM Gregg EW Del Rio C A cascade of care for diabetes in the United States: visualizing the gaps Ann Intern Med 2014 161 10 681 689 10.7326/M14-0019 25402511 · DOI
  28. [34]Karter AJ Schillinger D Adams AS Moffet HH Liu J Adler NE Elevated rates of diabetes in Pacific Islanders and Asian subgroups: The Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE) Diabetes Care 2013 36 3 574 579 10.2337/dc12-0722 23069837 PMC3579366 · DOI
  29. [36]Zelnick LR Leca N Young B Bansal N Association of the Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate With vs Without a Coefficient for Race With Time to Eligibility for Kidney Transplant JAMA Netw Open 2021 4 1 e2034004 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34004 33443583 PMC7809586 · DOI
  30. [38]Trischitta V Copetti M Moving Toward the Implementation of Precision Medicine Needs Highly Discriminatory, Validated, Inexpensive, and Easy-to-Use Prediction Models Diabetes Care 2020 43 4 701 703 10.2337/dci19-0079 32198284 · DOI
  31. [39]Steyerberg EW Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating 2009 New York Springer
  32. [40]Koopman RJ Mainous AG 3rd Evaluating multivariate risk scores for clinical decision making Fam Med 2008 40 6 412 416 18773779
  33. [41]Olshansky SJ, Carnes BA. Ever since gompertz. Demography. 1997;34(1):1–15. 9074828
  34. [42]Kulinskaya E, Gitsels LA, Bakbergenuly I, Wright NR. Calculation of changes in life expectancy based on proportional hazards model of an intervention. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics. 2020;93:27–35.
  35. [43]Harrell FE Jr Califf RM Pryor DB Lee KL Rosati RA Evaluating the yield of medical tests JAMA 1982 247 18 2543 2546 10.1001/jama.1982.03320430047030 7069920 · DOI · Paper page
  36. [44]Royston P Moons KG Altman DG Vergouwe Y Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model BMJ 2009 338 b604 10.1136/bmj.b604 19336487 · DOI · Paper page
  37. [45]Altman DG Vergouwe Y Royston P Moons KG Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model BMJ 2009 338 b605 10.1136/bmj.b605 19477892 · DOI · Paper page
  38. [46]Justice AC Covinsky KE Berlin JA Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information Ann Intern Med 1999 130 6 515 524 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00016 10075620 · DOI · Paper page
  39. [49]Harrell FE Jr Lee KL Mark DB Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors Stat Med 1996 15 4 361 387 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4 8668867 · DOI
  40. [51]American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on Care of Older Adults with Diabetes M, Moreno G, Mangione CM, Kimbro L, Vaisberg E. Guidelines abstracted from the American Geriatrics Society Guidelines for Improving the Care of Older Adults with Diabetes Mellitus: 2013 update. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(11):2020–6. PMC4064258 24219204
  41. [52]Qaseem A, Vijan S, Snow V, Cross JT, Weiss KB, Owens DK. Glycemic control and type 2 diabetes mellitus: the optimal hemoglobin A1c targets. A guidance statement from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(6):417–22. 17876024
  42. [53]Weiner JZ, Gopalan A, Mishra P, et al. Use and Discontinuation of Insulin Treatment Among Adults Aged 75 to 79 Years With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Intern Med. 2019. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3759 PMC6763990 31545376 · DOI · Paper page
  43. [54]Lee SJ Walter LC Quality indicators for older adults: preventing unintended harms JAMA 2011 306 13 1481 1482 10.1001/jama.2011.1418 21972311 PMC3285267 · DOI
  44. [55]McCoy R Lipska K Physicians frequently fail to de-intensify treatment in older patients with diabetes and very low haemoglobin A1c or blood pressure Evid Based Med 2016 21 4 158 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110462 27388796 PMC5362819 · DOI
  45. [56]Lipska KJ Montori VM Glucose control in older adults with diabetes mellitus-more harm than good? JAMA Intern Med 2013 173 14 1306 1307 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.6189 23753259 · DOI
  46. [59]Huang ES Karter AJ Danielson KK Warton EM Ahmed AT The association between the number of prescription medications and incident falls in a multi-ethnic population of adult type-2 diabetes patients: the diabetes and aging study J Gen Intern Med 2010 25 2 141 146 10.1007/s11606-009-1179-2 19967465 PMC2837501 · DOI · Paper page
  47. [60]Huang ES Sachs GA Chin MH Implications of new geriatric diabetes care guidelines for the assessment of quality of care in older patients Med Care 2006 44 4 373 377 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204281.42465.11 16565639 PMC2291144 · DOI
  48. [61]Schroeder EB, Karter AJ. Brief Commentary: Glycemic Targets for Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2018. 10.7326/M18-1471 29946700 · DOI
  49. [62]Bjork E Thompson W Ryg J Gaardboe O Jorgensen TL Lundby C Patient Preferences for Discussing Life Expectancy: a Systematic Review J Gen Intern Med 2021 36 10 3136 3147 10.1007/s11606-021-06973-5 34338978 PMC8481511 · DOI
  50. [63]Schoenborn NL Bowman TL 2nd Cayea D Pollack CE Feeser S Boyd C Primary Care Practitioners’ Views on Incorporating Long-term Prognosis in the Care of Older Adults JAMA Intern Med 2016 176 5 671 678 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0670 27064895 PMC5564293 · DOI
  51. [64]Seewoodharry M, Khunti K, Davies MJ, Gillies C, Seidu S. Attitudes of older adults and their carers towards deprescribing: a systematic review. Diabet Med. 2022:e14801. 10.1111/dme.14801 35118700 · DOI
  52. [65]Lee SJ Boscardin WJ Stijacic-Cenzer I Conell-Price J O’Brien S Walter LC Time lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and Denmark BMJ 2013 346 e8441 10.1136/bmj.e8441 23299842 PMC4688425 · DOI
  53. [66]Tang V Boscardin WJ Stijacic-Cenzer I Lee SJ Time to benefit for colorectal cancer screening: survival meta-analysis of flexible sigmoidoscopy trials BMJ 2015 350 h1662 10.1136/bmj.h1662 25881903 PMC4399600 · DOI
  54. [68]Schoenborn NL Massare J Park R Boyd CM Choi Y Pollack CE Assessment of Clinician Decision-making on Cancer Screening Cessation in Older Adults With Limited Life Expectancy JAMA Netw Open 2020 3 6 e206772 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6772 32511720 PMC7280953 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karter, A. J., Parker, M. M., Moffet, H. H., Lipska, K. J., Laiteerapong, N., Grant, R. W., Lee, C., & Huang, E. S.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Karter, Andrew J.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2023-05-30
Volume
38
Issue
13
Pages
2860-2869
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W4378783177
Cited by
13
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
3.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • NIA (R01 AG063391)
  • NIDDK (P30 DK092924, P30 DK092949)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
life expectancy estimation, diabetes in older adults, mortality prediction, risk scoring tool, shared decision-making, clinical trial inclusion, resource allocation
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Life Expectancy, Male, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review